Literature DB >> 14620357

Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality.

E Sussman1, I Winkler, E Schröger.   

Abstract

We tested the effects of predictability on involuntary attention switching to task-irrelevant sound changes (distraction). Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence are provided, showing that the predictability of task-irrelevant sound changes eliminates effects of distraction even though the automatic auditory change detection system remains responsive. Two indices of distraction, slower task performance and cortical brain responses associated with attention switching, were seen only in the unpredictable condition, in which the irrelevant acoustic changes were unexpected. Attention was not involuntarily drawn away from the primary task when the subjects had foreknowledge of when the irrelevant changes would occur. These results demonstrate attentional control over orienting to sound changes and suggest that involuntary attention switching occurs mainly when an irrelevant stimulus change is unexpected. The present data allowed observation of the temporal dynamics of attention switching in the human brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620357     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  51 in total

1.  Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal mismatch negativity sources.

Authors:  T Rinne; K Alho; R J Ilmoniemi; J Virtanen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Event-related potentials and autonomic responses to a change in unattended auditory stimuli.

Authors:  H Lyytinen; A P Blomberg; R Näätänen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

5.  Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.

Authors:  C Escera; K Alho; I Winkler; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  On how P300 amplitude varies with the utility of the eliciting stimuli.

Authors:  R Johnson; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-04

10.  Mismatch negativity to auditory stimulus change recorded directly from the human temporal cortex.

Authors:  J D Kropotov; R Näätnen; A V Sevostianov; K Alho; K Reinikainen; O V Kropotova
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  36 in total

1.  Preattentive auditory context effects.

Authors:  István Winkler; Elyse Sussman; Mari Tervaniemi; János Horváth; Walter Ritter; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Loudness summation and the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential in humans.

Authors:  Attila Oceák; István Winkler; Elyse Sussman; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1?

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Neurophysiological evidence for context-dependent encoding of sensory input in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elyse Sussman; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

6.  Preparation interval and cue utilization in the prevention of distraction.

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory-visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jie-Yu Lv; Ting Wang; Jiang Qiu; Si-Hai Feng; Shen Tu; Dong-Tao Wei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Auditory attentional capture: implicit and explicit approaches.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-19

9.  The event-related potential component P3a is diminished by identical deviance repetition, but not by non-identical repetitions.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Michael Weigl; Ronja Thiel; Ralph Mager
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.

Authors:  Caroline Max; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.