Literature DB >> 16362144

Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following tibial shaft fracture.

S W Veitch1, S C Findlay, A J Hamer, A Blumsohn, Richard Eastell, B M Ingle.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bone loss occurs in the regional bone following tibial shaft fracture. An earlier cross-sectional study showed that measurements made at the metaphyseal region of the tibia using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and the ultradistal region of the tibia using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were the most responsive at monitoring this bone loss. Biochemical markers of bone turnover enable us to assess the activity of bone formation and resorption during fracture healing. The aim of this longitudinal study was to determine the pattern and distribution of bone loss and bone turnover following a tibial shaft fracture treated with either plaster cast or intramedullary nail.
METHODS: Eighteen subjects underwent bone mass measurements using DXA at the tibia and hip and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the tibia and calcaneus of both limbs at 2 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks following fracture, with hip and tibia DXA measurements also performed at 52 weeks. Nine of the patients treated with plaster cast had pQCT measurements at the tibia at 24 weeks. We measured three bone formation markers, bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), osteocalcin (OC) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal peptide (PINP), a marker of bone resorption, serum C-telopeptides of type 1 collagen (beta-CTX) and a marker of collagen III turnover, procollagen type III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP) at 1 day, 3 days and 7 days and at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 weeks following fracture. The greatest bone losses were observed at the ultradistal region of the tibia using DXA (28%, p <0.001) and the metaphyseal region of the tibia using pQCT (26-31%, p <0.001) at 24 weeks. In the hip, the greatest loss was in the trochanter region at 24 weeks (10%, p <0.001). The greatest loss at the calcaneus measured using QUS was for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) measured using CUBA Clinical at 24 weeks (13%, p =0.01).
RESULTS: At 1 year, there was a small recovery in bone loss (ultradistal tibia DXA, 20%, p <0.01; trochanter DXA 9%, p <0.001). Bone turnover increased following fracture (PINP +72+/-21%, p <0.0001, bone ALP +199+/-22%, p =0.004, beta-CTX +105+/-23%, p <0.0001, all at 24 weeks). There was a smaller +33+/-10% increase in osteocalcin at 24 weeks. PIIINP concentration peaked at week 8 (+57+/-9%, p <0.0001). The bone resorption marker beta-CTX showed an earlier rise (week 2, 139+/-33%) than the bone formation markers.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that: (1) bone loss following tibial shaft fracture occurs both proximal and distal to the fracture; (2) the decreased BMD is largest for trabecular bone in the tibia with similar measurements using DXA and pQCT; (3) there is limited recovery of bone lost at the hip and tibia at 1 year; (4) tibial speed of sound (SOS) demonstrated a greater decrease than calcaneal SOS when comparing z -scores; (5) BUA is the QUS variable that shows the biggest decrease of bone mass at the calcaneus; (6) increase in bone turnover occurs following fracture with an earlier increase in bone resorption markers and a later rise in bone formation markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16362144     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-2025-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following ankle fracture.

Authors:  B M Ingle; S M Hay; H M Bottjer; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone mineral changes during tibial fracture healing.

Authors:  H C Cattermole; J E Cook; J N Fordham; D S Muckle; J L Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bone mineral loss after lower extremity trauma. 62 cases followed for 15-38 years.

Authors:  M K Karlsson; B E Nilsson; K J Obrant
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1993-06

5.  Trabecular bone changes in the greater trochanter after fracture of the femoral neck.

Authors:  K J Obrant
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1984-02

6.  Osteopenia in the immobilized rat hind limb is associated with increased bone resorption and decreased bone formation.

Authors:  M Weinreb; G A Rodan; D D Thompson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Changes in bone-mass after tibial shaft fracture.

Authors:  V Finsen; O Haave
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1987-08

8.  Long-term consequences of fracture of the lower leg: cross-sectional study and long-term longitudinal follow-up of bone mineral density in the hip after fracture of lower leg.

Authors:  E van der Poest Clement; H van der Wiel; P Patka; J C Roos; P Lips
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Loss of bone in the proximal part of the femur following unstable fractures of the leg.

Authors:  H E Van der Wiel; P Lips; J Nauta; P Patka; H J Haarman; G J Teule
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Bone loss after tibial fracture. Evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  K S Eyres; J A Kanis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-05
View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Bone turnover markers: use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kim Naylor; Richard Eastell
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  The influence of training status on the drop in muscle strength after acute exercise.

Authors:  Jessica Pingel; L Moerch; M Kjaer; H Langberg
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Bone turnover markers are correlated with quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: 5-year longitudinal data.

Authors:  J Lenora; P Gerdhem; K J Obrant; K K Ivaska
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Serum 25(OH)D is associated with an altered bone turnover marker response after a hip fracture.

Authors:  Christopher C Stewart; Nathan N O'Hara; Denise Orwig; Marc C Hochberg; Sheila Sprague; Jay Magaziner; Gerard P Slobogean
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Use of CTX-I and PINP as bone turnover markers: National Bone Health Alliance recommendations to standardize sample handling and patient preparation to reduce pre-analytical variability.

Authors:  P Szulc; K Naylor; N R Hoyle; R Eastell; E T Leary
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A fracture does not adversely affect bone mineral density responses after teriparatide treatment.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Quang V Ton; John P Kleimeyer; Joseph T Nguyen; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Biomarkers of bone turnover in diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis: a consensus advice from an Austrian working group.

Authors:  Christian Bieglmayer; Hans Peter Dimai; Rudolf Wolfgang Gasser; Stefan Kudlacek; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Wolfgang Woloszczuk; Elisabeth Zwettler; Andrea Griesmacher
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-08-14

Review 8.  Recent advances in the use of serological bone formation markers to monitor callus development and fracture healing.

Authors:  Marlon O Coulibaly; Debra L Sietsema; Travis A Burgers; Jim Mason; Bart O Williams; Clifford B Jones
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.807

9.  N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen as a biomarker of anabolic response to recombinant human GH and testosterone.

Authors:  Shalender Bhasin; E Jiaxiu He; Miwa Kawakubo; E Todd Schroeder; Kevin Yarasheski; Gregory J Opiteck; Alise Reicin; Fabian Chen; Raymond Lam; Jeffrey A Tsou; Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa; Ellen F Binder; Stanley P Azen; Fred R Sattler
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  Modulation of the inflammatory response for enhanced bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Paschalia M Mountziaris; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.