Literature DB >> 1401531

Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.

W M Rabinowitz1, D K Eddington, L A Delhorne, P A Cuneo.   

Abstract

A comprehensive set of speech reception measures were obtained in a group of about 20 postlingually deafened adult users of the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. The measures included audio, visual, and audiovisual recognition of words embedded in two types of sentences (with differing degrees of difficulty) and audio-only recognition of isolated monosyllabic words, consonant identification (12 alternatives, /Ca/), and vowel identification (8 alternatives, /bVt/). For most implantees, the audiovisual gains in the sentence tests were very high. Quantitative relations among audio-only scores were assessed using power-law transformations suggested by Boothroyd and Nittrouer [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 101-114 (1988)] that can account for the benefit of sentence context (via a factor k) and the relation between word and phoneme recognition (via a factor j). Across the broad range of performance that existed among the subjects, substantial order was observed among measures of speech reception along the continuum from recognition of words in sentences, words in isolation, speech segments, and the retrieval of underlying phonetic features. Correlations exceeded 0.85 among direct and sentence-derived measures of isolated word recognition as well as among direct and word-derived measures of segmental recognition. Results from a variety of other studies involving presentation of limited auditory signals, single-channel and multichannel implants, and tactual systems revealed a similar pattern among word recognition, overall consonant identification performance, and consonantal feature recruitment. Finally, improving the reception of consonantal place cues was identified as key to producing the greatest potential gains in speech reception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1401531     DOI: 10.1121/1.405252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  Ted A Meyer; Stefan A Frisch; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The histopathology of revision cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Donald K Eddington; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of simulated spectral holes on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking under binaural and monaural listening.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Gail Donaldson; Ala Somarowthu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Human Otopathologic Findings in Cases of Folded Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

Authors:  Danielle R Trakimas; Elliott D Kozin; Iman Ghanad; Joseph B Nadol; Aaron K Remenschneider
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: a histopathologic study.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Speech recognition and acoustic features in combined electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; Yongxin Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Visual Reliance During Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users and Candidates.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara J Vasil; Christin Ray
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.