Literature DB >> 12851554

Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.

Ted A Meyer1, Stefan A Frisch, David B Pisoni, Richard T Miyamoto, Mario A Svirsky.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESES: Do cochlear implants provide enough information to allow adult cochlear implant users to understand words in ways that are similar to listeners with acoustic hearing? Can we use a computational model to gain insight into the underlying mechanisms used by cochlear implant users to recognize spoken words?
BACKGROUND: The Neighborhood Activation Model has been shown to be a reasonable model of word recognition for listeners with normal hearing. The Neighborhood Activation Model assumes that words are recognized in relation to other similar-sounding words in a listener's lexicon. The probability of correctly identifying a word is based on the phoneme perception probabilities from a listener's closed-set consonant and vowel confusion matrices modified by the relative frequency of occurrence of the target word compared with similar-sounding words (neighbors). Common words with few similar-sounding neighbors are more likely to be selected as responses than less common words with many similar-sounding neighbors. Recent studies have shown that several of the assumptions of the Neighborhood Activation Model also hold true for cochlear implant users.
METHODS: Closed-set consonant and vowel confusion matrices were obtained from 26 postlingually deafened adults who use cochlear implants. Confusion matrices were used to represent input errors to the Neighborhood Activation Model. Responses to the different stimuli were then generated by the Neighborhood Activation Model after incorporating the frequency of occurrence counts of the stimuli and their neighbors. Model outputs were compared with obtained performance measures on the Consonant-Vowel Nucleus-Consonant word test. Information transmission analysis was used to assess whether the Neighborhood Activation Model was able to successfully generate and predict word and individual phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users.
RESULTS: The Neighborhood Activation Model predicted Consonant-Vowel Nucleus-Consonant test words at levels similar to those correctly identified by the cochlear implant users. The Neighborhood Activation Model also predicted phoneme feature information well.
CONCLUSION: The results obtained suggest that the Neighborhood Activation Model provides a reasonable explanation of word recognition by postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation. It appears that multichannel cochlear implants give cochlear implant users access to their mental lexicons in a manner that is similar to listeners with acoustic hearing. The lexical properties of the test stimuli used to assess performance are important to spoken-word recognition and should be included in further models of the word recognition process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851554      PMCID: PMC3432952          DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  27 in total

1.  Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz; D K Eddington; L A Delhorne; P A Cuneo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  M W Skinner; L K Holden; T A Holden; R C Dowell; P M Seligman; J A Brimacombe; A L Beiter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  P J Blamey; B C Pyman; M Gordon; G M Clark; A M Brown; R C Dowell; R D Hollow
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: retroactive effects on multiple activation.

Authors:  M S Cluff; P A Luce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; M J Osberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Longitudinal assessment of physiological and psychophysical measures in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  C J Brown; P J Abbas; M Bertschy; R S Tyler; M Lowder; G Takahashi; S Purdy; B J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  B J Gantz; G G Woodworth; J F Knutson; P J Abbas; R S Tyler
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  M W Skinner; G M Clark; L A Whitford; P M Seligman; S J Staller; D B Shipp; J K Shallop; C Everingham; C M Menapace; P L Arndt
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-11

10.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

2.  Changes in Speech-Related Brain Activity During Adaptation to Electro-Acoustic Hearing.

Authors:  Tobias Balkenhol; Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke; Nicole Rotter; Jérôme J Servais
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.