Literature DB >> 21196725

The histopathology of revision cochlear implantation.

Joonhan Lee1, Donald K Eddington, Joseph B Nadol.   

Abstract

The current study evaluates histopathologic changes in the temporal bones of 4 human subjects who underwent revision cochlear implantation. Specimens were removed at autopsy, fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were serially sectioned, reconstructed by two-dimensional methods, and the tracks of the initial and revision cochlear-implant electrodes identified. The tracks were of three types: a 'common track' (shared by the reimplantation electrode and initial electrode), 'two tracks' (where the reimplantation electrode was in a different track than that of the initial electrode) and 'one track' (where the reimplantation electrode extended beyond the initial electrode, forming a single track). Associated histopathologic findings (new bone formation, fibrosis or inflammatory cells, and cochlear fluid) were evaluated for the three types of tracks. In all 4 subjects, the insertion depth of the revision cochlear implant was deeper than that of the initial cochlear implant. The primary track of the initial implantation did not interfere with insertion of a revision cochlear implant, and the trajectory of the revision electrode did not always follow the primary track. In cochlear segments with a common track or two tracks, the mean (across-subject) percent area of the extraelectrode cochlear duct filled with abnormal (new bone or fibrotic) tissue (43.2%) was significantly greater than the mean percent area occupied by fluid (13.4%; t = 3.12, d.f. = 19.9, p = 0.003).
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21196725      PMCID: PMC7265424          DOI: 10.1159/000322307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  23 in total

1.  Quantification of human spiral ganglion cells by serial section reconstruction and segmental density estimates.

Authors:  J B Nadol
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  Cochlear implant failures and revision.

Authors:  Amy-Anne Donatelli Lassig; Teresa A Zwolan; Steven A Telian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Clinical performance of children following revision surgery for a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Jose N Fayad; Laurie S Eisenberg; Melinda Gillinger; Margaret Winter; Amy S Martinez; William M Luxford
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Cochlear electrode reimplantation in the guinea pig.

Authors:  A B Greenberg; M W Myers; D O Hartshorn; J M Miller; R A Altschuler
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Analysis of fifty-six cochlear implant device failures.

Authors:  Jan Gosepath; Karl Lippert; Annerose Keilmann; Wolf J Mann
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 1.538

6.  Revision cochlear implant surgery: causes and outcome.

Authors:  Jose N Fayad; Tony Baino; Simon C Parisier
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Quantitative evaluation of new bone and fibrous tissue in the cochlea following cochlear implantation in the human.

Authors:  Mehmet A Somdas; Peter M M C Li; Darren M Whiten; Donald K Eddington; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Revision cochlear implant surgery in children.

Authors:  Robert D Cullen; Jose N Fayad; William M Luxford; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Cochlear reimplantation: causes of failure, outcomes, and audiologic performance.

Authors:  Mathieu Côté; Pierre Ferron; François Bergeron; Richard Bussières
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study.

Authors:  A M Henson; W H Slattery; W M Luxford; D M Mills
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Correlation between histologic and radiographic reconstruction of intracochlear electrode position in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Meng-Yu Zhu; Hugh D Curtin; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Surgical findings and auditory performance after cochlear implant revision surgery.

Authors:  R Manrique-Huarte; A Huarte; M J Manrique
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Round window versus cochleostomy technique in cochlear implantation: histologic findings.

Authors:  Céline Richard; Jose N Fayad; Joni Doherty; Fred H Linthicum
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Incomplete and false tract insertions in cochlear implantation: retrospective review of surgical and auditory outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish Vashishth; Andrea Fulcheri; Maurizio Guida; Antonio Caruso; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.