Literature DB >> 20203481

Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: a histopathologic study.

Joonhan Lee1, Joseph B Nadol, Donald K Eddington.   

Abstract

The depth of electrode insertion of a multichannel cochlear implant has been suggested as a clinical variable that may correlate with word recognition using the implant. The current study evaluates this relationship using the human temporal bone collection at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Twenty-seven temporal bones of subjects with cochlear implants were studied. Temporal bones were removed at autopsy, fixed and prepared for histological study by standard techniques. Specimens were then serially sectioned, and reconstructed by two-dimensional methods. Three measures of length were made from each subject's reconstruction: (1) depth of insertion (DI) of the cochlear implant electrode array, from the round window to the array's apical tip; (2) inserted length (IL) from the cochleostomy to the apical tip of the array, and (3) cochlear duct length (CDL) from the round window to the helicotrema. The active electrode length (AEL) was defined as the distance between the most apical and most basal electrodes of the array. Stepwise regression was used to identify whether subsets of six metrics associated with insertion depth (DI, DI/AEL, DI/CDL, IL, IL/AEL and IL/CDL), duration of deafness, sound-processing strategy, potential for central impairment and age at implantation accounted for significant across-subject variance in the last recorded NU-6 word score measured during each subject's life. Age at implantation and potential for central impairment account for significant percentages of the across-subject variance in NU-6 word scores for the 27 subjects studied. None of the insertion metrics accounted for significant performance variance, even when the variance associated with the other variables was controlled. These results, together with those of previous studies, are consistent with a relatively weak association between electrode insertion depth and speech reception. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20203481      PMCID: PMC2919426          DOI: 10.1159/000289571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  18 in total

1.  Effects of electrode location on speech recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; W H Slattery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Wolfgang Arnold; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Joachim Müller; Peter Roland
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz; D K Eddington; L A Delhorne; P A Cuneo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception.

Authors:  Kumiko Yukawa; Lawrence Cohen; Peter Blamey; Brian Pyman; Viruch Tungvachirakul; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  The effects of limiting the number of Nucleus 22 cochlear implant electrodes programmed on speech perception.

Authors:  L L Geier; S J Norton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  P J Blamey; B C Pyman; M Gordon; G M Clark; A M Brown; R C Dowell; R D Hollow
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Quantification of human spiral ganglion cells by serial section reconstruction and segmental density estimates.

Authors:  J B Nadol
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Otopathology in a case of multichannel cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J B Nadol; D R Ketten; B J Burgess
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Darlene R Ketten; Laura K Holden; Gary W Harding; Peter G Smith; George A Gates; J Gail Neely; G Robert Kletzker; Barry Brunsden; Barbara Blocker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

10.  Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Y C Tong; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  29 in total

1.  Automatic Cochlear Duct Length Estimation for Selection of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Alejandro Rivas; Ahmet Cakir; Jacob B Hunter; Robert F Labadie; M Geraldine Zuniga; George B Wanna; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  L A J Reiss; C W Turner; S A Karsten; B J Gantz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Rindy A Ito; Jessica L Eggleston; Selena Liao; Jillian J Becker; Carrie E Lakin; Frank M Warren; Sean O McMenomey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Estimation of insertion depth angle based on cochlea diameter and linear insertion depth: a prediction tool for the CI422.

Authors:  Annett Franke-Trieger; Dirk Mürbe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Teymouri; Timothy E Hullar; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Within-subject comparison of word recognition and spiral ganglion cell count in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Mohammad Seyyedi; Lucas M Viana; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Abnormal binaural spectral integration in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Rindy A Ito; Jessica L Eggleston; David R Wozny
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-24

8.  Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Jennifer R Fowler; Curtis L Hartling; Yonghee Oh
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Preoperative prediction of angular insertion depth of lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Mohammad M R Khan; Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-06-03

10.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.