BACKGROUND: Adults with cochlear implants (CIs) are believed to rely more heavily on visual cues during speech recognition tasks than their normal-hearing peers. However, the relationship between auditory and visual reliance during audiovisual (AV) speech recognition is unclear and may depend on an individual's auditory proficiency, duration of hearing loss (HL), age, and other factors. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to examine whether visual reliance during AV speech recognition depends on auditory function for adult CI candidates (CICs) and adult experienced CI users (ECIs). STUDY SAMPLE: Participants included 44 ECIs and 23 CICs. All participants were postlingually deafened and had met clinical candidacy requirements for cochlear implantation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants completed City University of New York sentence recognition testing. Three separate lists of twelve sentences each were presented: the first in the auditory-only (A-only) condition, the second in the visual-only (V-only) condition, and the third in combined AV fashion. Each participant's amount of "visual enhancement" (VE) and "auditory enhancement" (AE) were computed (i.e., the benefit to AV speech recognition of adding visual or auditory information, respectively, relative to what could potentially be gained). The relative reliance of VE versus AE was also computed as a VE/AE ratio. RESULTS: VE/AE ratio was predicted inversely by A-only performance. Visual reliance was not significantly different between ECIs and CICs. Duration of HL and age did not account for additional variance in the VE/AE ratio. CONCLUSIONS: A shift toward visual reliance may be driven by poor auditory performance in ECIs and CICs. The restoration of auditory input through a CI does not necessarily facilitate a shift back toward auditory reliance. Findings suggest that individual listeners with HL may rely on both auditory and visual information during AV speech recognition, to varying degrees based on their own performance and experience, to optimize communication performance in real-world listening situations. American Academy of Audiology.
BACKGROUND: Adults with cochlear implants (CIs) are believed to rely more heavily on visual cues during speech recognition tasks than their normal-hearing peers. However, the relationship between auditory and visual reliance during audiovisual (AV) speech recognition is unclear and may depend on an individual's auditory proficiency, duration of hearing loss (HL), age, and other factors. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to examine whether visual reliance during AV speech recognition depends on auditory function for adult CI candidates (CICs) and adult experienced CI users (ECIs). STUDY SAMPLE: Participants included 44 ECIs and 23 CICs. All participants were postlingually deafened and had met clinical candidacy requirements for cochlear implantation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants completed City University of New York sentence recognition testing. Three separate lists of twelve sentences each were presented: the first in the auditory-only (A-only) condition, the second in the visual-only (V-only) condition, and the third in combined AV fashion. Each participant's amount of "visual enhancement" (VE) and "auditory enhancement" (AE) were computed (i.e., the benefit to AV speech recognition of adding visual or auditory information, respectively, relative to what could potentially be gained). The relative reliance of VE versus AE was also computed as a VE/AE ratio. RESULTS: VE/AE ratio was predicted inversely by A-only performance. Visual reliance was not significantly different between ECIs and CICs. Duration of HL and age did not account for additional variance in the VE/AE ratio. CONCLUSIONS: A shift toward visual reliance may be driven by poor auditory performance in ECIs and CICs. The restoration of auditory input through a CI does not necessarily facilitate a shift back toward auditory reliance. Findings suggest that individual listeners with HL may rely on both auditory and visual information during AV speech recognition, to varying degrees based on their own performance and experience, to optimize communication performance in real-world listening situations. American Academy of Audiology.
Authors: Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Susan Van Wie; Rene H Gifford; Philipos C Loizou; Louise M Loiselle; Tyler Oakes; Sarah Cook Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Eva Gutierrez-Sigut; Veronica M Lamarche; Katherine Rowley; Emilio Ferreiro Lago; María Jesús Pardo-Guijarro; Ixone Saenz; Berta Frigola; Santiago Frigola; Delfina Aliaga; Laura Goldberg Journal: Cogn Res Princ Implic Date: 2022-09-05
Authors: Emilija M Zivkovic Marinkov; Natasa K Rancic; Dusan R Milisavljevic; Milan D Stankovic; Vuk D Milosevic; Marina M Malobabic; Irena N Popovic; Aleksandra M Ignjatovic; Mila R Bojanovic; Jasmina D Stojanovic Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 2.430