Danielle R Trakimas1,2,3, Elliott D Kozin1,2, Iman Ghanad1,2, Joseph B Nadol1,2, Aaron K Remenschneider1,2,3,4. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 3. University of Massachusetts Medical School. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that human cases of cochlear implantation (CI) with folding of the electrode array will demonstrate greater degrees of intracochlear ossification, lower spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) counts, and poorer audiometric outcomes. BACKGROUND: CI electrode array folding, such folding of the proximal array, is a relatively common surgical complication that can occur with forceful electrode insertion and may be an important and avoidable factor affecting implant outcomes. However, otopathologic findings and audiologic outcomes of human cases where folding of the implant electrode array is observed remain undefined. METHODS: Specimens from a human temporal bone repository having undergone CI during life were evaluated. Specimens with folding of the electrode array on histological analysis constituted study cases. Electrode-matched specimens without array folding constituted controls. All specimens were examined by light microscopy and histopathologically described. Intracochlear fibrosis and osseous tissue, and SGN counts were measured. Pre- and postoperative word recognition scores were also compared. RESULTS: Cases with folded electrodes showed greater volumes of intracochlear osseous tissue than controls, which was most prominent in areas adjacent to array folding. Both cases and controls demonstrated similar amounts of fibrous tissue. Folded cases showed decreased SGNs when compared with the contralateral ear, whereas controls showed stable SGN populations between ears. In this small cohort, postoperative hearing outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Atypical fibro-osseous changes and lower SGN counts are observed in cases of CI electrode folding. Future studies are necessary to determine if recognition and correction of folding can prevent long-term intracochlear changes.
HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that human cases of cochlear implantation (CI) with folding of the electrode array will demonstrate greater degrees of intracochlear ossification, lower spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) counts, and poorer audiometric outcomes. BACKGROUND: CI electrode array folding, such folding of the proximal array, is a relatively common surgical complication that can occur with forceful electrode insertion and may be an important and avoidable factor affecting implant outcomes. However, otopathologic findings and audiologic outcomes of human cases where folding of the implant electrode array is observed remain undefined. METHODS: Specimens from a human temporal bone repository having undergone CI during life were evaluated. Specimens with folding of the electrode array on histological analysis constituted study cases. Electrode-matched specimens without array folding constituted controls. All specimens were examined by light microscopy and histopathologically described. Intracochlear fibrosis and osseous tissue, and SGN counts were measured. Pre- and postoperative word recognition scores were also compared. RESULTS: Cases with folded electrodes showed greater volumes of intracochlear osseous tissue than controls, which was most prominent in areas adjacent to array folding. Both cases and controls demonstrated similar amounts of fibrous tissue. Folded cases showed decreased SGNs when compared with the contralateral ear, whereas controls showed stable SGN populations between ears. In this small cohort, postoperative hearing outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Atypical fibro-osseous changes and lower SGN counts are observed in cases of CI electrode folding. Future studies are necessary to determine if recognition and correction of folding can prevent long-term intracochlear changes.
Authors: Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Stephen J Rebscher; J Thomas Roland; William Luxford; Patricia A Leake Journal: Hear Res Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.208
Authors: Helen X Xu; Grace H Kim; Eugene P Snissarenko; Sebahattin Cureoglu; Michael M Paparella Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Date: 2012-01-21 Impact factor: 1.494
Authors: Andreas F Zehnder; Arthur G Kristiansen; Joe C Adams; Saumil N Merchant; Michael J McKenna Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: M Geraldine Zuniga; Alejandro Rivas; Andrea Hedley-Williams; Rene H Gifford; Robert Dwyer; Benoit M Dawant; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Kristen L Hovis; George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: P Mittmann; G Lauer; A Ernst; S Mutze; F Hassepass; S Arndt; D Arweiler-Harbeck; F Christov Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Tadao Okayasu; Alicia M Quesnel; Jennifer T O'Malley; Takefumi Kamakura; Joseph B Nadol Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 2.311