Literature DB >> 20136220

Effects of simulated spectral holes on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking under binaural and monaural listening.

Soha N Garadat1, Ruth Y Litovsky, Gongqiang Yu, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

The possibility that "dead regions" or "spectral holes" can account for some differences in performance between bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users and normal-hearing listeners was explored. Using a 20-band noise-excited vocoder to simulate CI processing, this study examined effects of spectral holes on speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and spatial release from masking (SRM) in difficult listening conditions. Prior to processing, stimuli were convolved through head-related transfer-functions to provide listeners with free-field directional cues. Processed stimuli were presented over headphones under binaural or monaural (right ear) conditions. Using Greenwood's [(1990). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2592-2605] frequency-position function and assuming a cochlear length of 35 mm, spectral holes were created for variable sizes (6 and 10 mm) and locations (base, middle, and apex). Results show that middle-frequency spectral holes were the most disruptive to SRTs, whereas high-frequency spectral holes were the most disruptive to SRM. Spectral holes generally reduced binaural advantages in difficult listening conditions. These results suggest the importance of measuring dead regions in CI users. It is possible that customized programming for bilateral CI processors based on knowledge about dead regions can enhance performance in adverse listening situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20136220      PMCID: PMC2830263          DOI: 10.1121/1.3273897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  79 in total

1.  Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz; D K Eddington; L A Delhorne; P A Cuneo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences.

Authors:  T S Bell; D D Dirks; T D Trine
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-08

3.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual input.

Authors:  K W Grant; L D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Apical hair cells and hearing.

Authors:  C A Prosen; D B Moody; W C Stebbins; D W Smith; M S Sommers; J N Brown; R A Altschuler; J E Hawkins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The effect of temporal waveform shape on spectral discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  M R Leek; V Summers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spectral redundancy: intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits.

Authors:  R M Warren; K R Riener; J A Bashford; B S Brubaker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

9.  Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those with normal hearing.

Authors:  E Pekkarinen; A Salmivalli; J Suonpää
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1990

10.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Self-Selection of Frequency Tables with Bilateral Mismatches in an Acoustic Simulation of a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Ksenia Prosolovich; Chin-Tuan Tan; E Katelyn Glassman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Polarity Sensitivity as a Potential Correlate of Neural Degeneration in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Quentin Mesnildrey; Frédéric Venail; Robert P Carlyon; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-04

5.  Differential weighting of temporal envelope cues from the low-frequency region for Mandarin sentence recognition in noise.

Authors:  Yang Guo; Zhong Zheng; Keyi Li; Yuanyuan Sun; Liang Xia; Di Qian; Yanmei Feng
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.264

Review 6.  [Pathophysiology of hearing loss : Classification and treatment options].

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  The Temporal Limits Encoder as a Sound Coding Strategy for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Qinglin Meng
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-20

8.  Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Use of an adaptive-bandwidth protocol to measure importance functions for simulated cochlear implant frequency channels.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Kristina DeRoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.