Literature DB >> 7669483

Method specificity of the auscultatory estimates of the inodilatory reduction of diastolic blood pressure based on Korotkoff IV and V criteria.

C De Mey1.   

Abstract

1. Non-invasive measurements of blood pressure (BP) are method-specific estimates of actual blood pressure. The agreement of the auscultatory Korokoff V ('disappearance' of sound, kv) and Korokoff IV ('sound muffling' kiv) cut-off points in measuring diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated in healthy subjects in the presence of various controlled inodilatory interventions. 2. Eating (n = 8), 10 min i.v. infusion of 1 microgram min-1 isoprenaline and adrenaline (n = 12), p.o. administration of 40 mg of the PDE-III inhibitors isomazole and meribendan (n = 18) and p.o. administration of 1200 mg celiprolol (n = 15) caused evident chrono-inodilatory responses: average HR increases of 7, 19, 10, 17, 17 and 8 beats min-1, estimated CO increases of 1.6, 4.5, 2.3, 1.9, 2.6 and 1.8 1 min-1 and average shortening of QS2c of 18, 41, 8, 37, 42 and 9 ms for food, isoprenaline, adrenaline, isomazole, meribendan and celiprolol, respectively. 3. In general, there was good agreement between DBPkV and DBPkIV measurements before the administration of the inodilatory treatments (bias DBPkV-DBPkIV: 1-2 mm Hg) but the extent of inodilatory DBP reduction (-8, -6, -10, -2, -7 and -8 mm Hg according to DBPkIV for food, isoprenaline, adrenaline, isomazole, meribendan and celiprolol, respectively) was substantially overestimated when based on Korotkoff-V rather than -IV (bias DBPkV-DBPkIV in estimating the inodilatory effect on DBP: -8, -12, 1, -13, -12 and -7 mm Hg for food, isoprenaline, adrenaline, isomazole, meribendan and celiprolol, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7669483      PMCID: PMC1365054          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04484.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  15 in total

1.  Low frequency arterial wall movements for indirect blood pressure measurement in man. Validation of a method for non-invasive assessment of blood pressure under the influence of isoprenaline and angiotensin.

Authors:  U Dietz; G G Belz
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1991-05

2.  Postprandial haemodynamic changes: a source of bias in cardiovascular research affected by its own methodological bias.

Authors:  C de Mey; S Hansen-Schmidt; D Enterling
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 10.787

3.  The indirect method of recording blood pressure during exercise--can the diastolic pressure be measured?

Authors:  L Kaijser
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  1987-06

4.  Distribution and determinants of the difference between diastolic phase 4 and phase 5 blood pressure.

Authors:  M J Lichtenstein; G Rose; M Shipley
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system.

Authors:  W G Kubicek; J N Karnegis; R P Patterson; D A Witsoe; R H Mattson
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1966-12

6.  Indirect measurement of blood pressure during exercise testing can be misleading.

Authors:  B A Gould; R S Hornung; D G Altman; P M Cashman; E B Raftery
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-06

7.  In search of Korotkoff.

Authors:  M Laher; E O'Brien
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982 Dec 18-25

8.  The criterion for diastolic pressure--revolution and counterrevolution.

Authors:  A C Burton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Effect of pretreatment with the selective beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist bisoprolol on the subsequent cardiovascular actions and beta-adrenoceptor subtype specific occupancy of celiprolol in healthy man.

Authors:  C de Mey; K Beithaupt; D Palm; U Fuhr; G G Belz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Measured differences between fourth and fifth phase diastolic blood pressures in 4885 adults: implications for blood pressure surveys.

Authors:  A R Folsom; R J Prineas; D R Jacobs; R V Luepker; R F Gillum
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  1 in total

1.  Method specificity of non-invasive blood pressure measurement: oscillometry and finger pulse pressure vs acoustic methods.

Authors:  C De Mey; V Schroeter; R Butzer; S Roll; G G Belz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.335

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.