Literature DB >> 12871918

The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.

Sarah P Otto1.   

Abstract

In diploids, sexual reproduction promotes both the segregation of alleles at the same locus and the recombination of alleles at different loci. This article is the first to investigate the possibility that sex might have evolved and been maintained to promote segregation, using a model that incorporates both a general selection regime and modifier alleles that alter an individual's allocation to sexual vs. asexual reproduction. The fate of different modifier alleles was found to depend strongly on the strength of selection at fitness loci and on the presence of inbreeding among individuals undergoing sexual reproduction. When selection is weak and mating occurs randomly among sexually produced gametes, reductions in the occurrence of sex are favored, but the genome-wide strength of selection is extremely small. In contrast, when selection is weak and some inbreeding occurs among gametes, increased allocation to sexual reproduction is expected as long as deleterious mutations are partially recessive and/or beneficial mutations are partially dominant. Under strong selection, the conditions under which increased allocation to sex evolves are reversed. Because deleterious mutations are typically considered to be partially recessive and weakly selected and because most populations exhibit some degree of inbreeding, this model predicts that higher frequencies of sex would evolve and be maintained as a consequence of the effects of segregation. Even with low levels of inbreeding, selection is stronger on a modifier that promotes segregation than on a modifier that promotes recombination, suggesting that the benefits of segregation are more likely than the benefits of recombination to have driven the evolution of sexual reproduction in diploids.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12871918      PMCID: PMC1462613     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  28 in total

1.  Mutation-selection balance, dominance and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  J R Chasnov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Selection for recombination in small populations.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  T Lenormand; S P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  General models of multilocus evolution.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Toby Johnson; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Natural and sexual selection on many loci.

Authors:  N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Recombination and the evolution of diploidy.

Authors:  S P Otto; D B Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Population genetic perspectives on the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  M W Feldman; S P Otto; F B Christiansen
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  Selection, generalized transmission and the evolution of modifier genes. I. The reduction principle.

Authors:  L Altenberg; M W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

View more
  25 in total

1.  Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selection for recombination in structured populations.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Sarah P Otto; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The evolution of plastic recombination.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Lilach Hadany; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The ecological distribution of reproductive mode in oribatid mites, as related to biological complexity.

Authors:  Jennifer M Cianciolo; Roy A Norton
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Mitotic recombination counteracts the benefits of genetic segregation.

Authors:  Mohammad A Mandegar; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance and genetic drift.

Authors:  Christoph R Haag; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The evolution of condition-dependent sex in the face of high costs.

Authors:  Lilach Hadany; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Selective advantage for sexual reproduction with random haploid fusion.

Authors:  Emmanuel Tannenbaum
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 1.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.