Literature DB >> 3692141

Selection, generalized transmission and the evolution of modifier genes. I. The reduction principle.

L Altenberg1, M W Feldman.   

Abstract

Modifier gene models are used to explore the evolution of features of organisms, such as the genetic system, that are not directly involved in the determination of fitness. Recent work has shown that a general "reduction principle" holds in models of selectively neutral modifiers of recombination, mutation, and migration. Here we present a framework for models of modifier genes that shows these reduction results to be part of a more general theory, for which recombination and mutation are special cases. The deterministic forces that affect the genetic composition of a population can be partitioned into two categories: selection and transmission. Selection includes differential viabilities, fertilities, and mating success. Imperfect transmission occurs as a result of such phenomena as recombination, mutation and migration, meiosis, gene conversion, and meiotic drive. Selectively neutral modifier genes affect transmission, and a neutral modifier gene can evolve only by generating association with selected genes whose transmission it affects. We show that, in randomly mating populations at equilibrium, imperfect transmission of selected genes allows a variance in their marginal fitnesses to be maintained. This variance in the marginal fitnesses of selected genes is what drives the evolution of neutral modifier genes. Populations with a variance in marginal fitnesses at equilibrium are always subject to invasion by modifier genes that bring about perfect transmission of the selected genes. It is also found, within certain constraints, that for modifier genes producing what we call "linear variation" in the transmission processes, a new modifier allele can invade a population at equilibrium if it reduces the level of imperfect transmission acting on the selected genes, and will be expelled if it increases the level of imperfect transmission. Moreover, the strength of the induced selection on the modifier gene is shown to range up to the order of the departure of the genetic system from perfect transmission.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3692141      PMCID: PMC1203230     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  Subdivided populations: a review of the one- and two-locus deterministic theory.

Authors:  F B Christiansen; M W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  The effect of selection on genetic variability: a simulation study.

Authors:  M G Bulmer
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Evolution of recombination in a constant environment.

Authors:  M W Feldman; F B Christiansen; L D Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Selection on recombination in clines.

Authors:  D Charlesworth; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Selection for recombination in partially self-fertilizing populations.

Authors:  D Charlesworth; B Charlesworth; C Strobeck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. I. The solution of a special case and some general implications.

Authors:  T Prout; J Bundgaard; S Bryant
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Effects of linkage on response to directional selection from new mutations.

Authors:  P D Keightley; W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Evolution of the mutation rate at a heterotic locus.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. II. Linkage modification in the segregation distortion system.

Authors:  G J Thomson; M W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  The molecular basis of dominance.

Authors:  H Kacser; J A Burns
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  24 in total

1.  Recombination can evolve in large finite populations given selection on sufficient loci.

Authors:  Mark M Iles; Kevin Walters; Chris Cannings
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Segregation and the evolution of sex under overdominant selection.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The evolution of mutator genes in bacterial populations: the roles of environmental change and timing.

Authors:  Mark M Tanaka; Carl T Bergstrom; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Resolvent positive linear operators exhibit the reduction phenomenon.

Authors:  Lee Altenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolution of recombination due to random drift.

Authors:  N H Barton; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The evolution of condition-dependent sex in the face of high costs.

Authors:  Lilach Hadany; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Asymmetric dispersal can maintain larval polymorphism: a model motivated by Streblospio benedicti.

Authors:  Christina Zakas; David W Hall
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  On the modification of recombination with sex-dependent fitnesses and linkage.

Authors:  U Liberman; M W Feldman
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.259

10.  The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.