Literature DB >> 10978305

The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment.

T Lenormand1, S P Otto.   

Abstract

Most models describing the evolution of recombination have focused on the case of a single population, implicitly assuming that all individuals are equally likely to mate and that spatial heterogeneity in selection is absent. In these models, the evolution of recombination is driven by linkage disequilibria generated either by epistatic selection or drift. Models based on epistatic selection show that recombination can be favored if epistasis is negative and weak compared to directional selection and if the recombination modifier locus is tightly linked to the selected loci. In this article, we examine the joint effects of spatial heterogeneity in selection and epistasis on the evolution of recombination. In a model with two patches, each subject to different selection regimes, we consider the cases of mutation-selection and migration-selection balance as well as the spread of beneficial alleles. We find that including spatial heterogeneity extends the range of epistasis over which recombination can be favored. Indeed, recombination can be favored without epistasis, with negative and even with positive epistasis depending on environmental circumstances. The selection pressure acting on recombination-modifier loci is often much stronger with spatial heterogeneity, and even loosely linked modifiers and free linkage may evolve. In each case, predicting whether recombination is favored requires knowledge of both the type of environmental heterogeneity and epistasis, as none of these factors alone is sufficient to predict the outcome.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10978305      PMCID: PMC1461255     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  35 in total

1.  Selection on recombination in clines.

Authors:  D Charlesworth; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Gene flow and selection in a two-locus system.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Migration versus mutation in the evolution of recombination under multilocus selection.

Authors:  K V Pylkov; L A Zhivotovsky; M W Feldman
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Genotype-by-environment and epistatic interactions in Drosophila melanogaster: the effects of Gpdh allozymes, genetic background and rearing temperature on larval developmental time and viability.

Authors:  P T Barnes; B Holland; V Courreges
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Why reproduce sexually?

Authors:  G C Williams; J B Mitton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xix. Genotype-Environment Interaction in Viability.

Authors:  H Tachida; T Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Do deleterious mutations act synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer.

Authors:  E Szathmáry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; D Houle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Maintenance of an aminopeptidase allele frequency cline by natural selection.

Authors:  R K Koehn; R I Newell; F Immermann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  58 in total

1.  Recessive mutations and the maintenance of sex in structured populations.

Authors:  A F Agrawal; J R Chasnov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The evolution of sex dimorphism in recombination.

Authors:  Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Ecological stress and sex evolution in soil microfungi.

Authors:  Isabella Grishkan; Abraham B Korol; Eviatar Nevo; Solomon P Wasser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Recombination can evolve in large finite populations given selection on sufficient loci.

Authors:  Mark M Iles; Kevin Walters; Chris Cannings
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Fixation probability in a two-locus model by the ancestral recombination-selection graph.

Authors:  Sabin Lessard; Amir R Kermany
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetic linkage and natural selection.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Epistasis in natural populations of a predominantly selfing plant.

Authors:  S Volis; I Shulgina; M Zaretsky; O Koren
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Lutz Becks; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.