Literature DB >> 1628815

Recombination and the evolution of diploidy.

S P Otto1, D B Goldstein.   

Abstract

With two copies of every gene, a diploid organism is able to mask recessive deleterious mutations. In this paper we present the analysis of a two-locus model designed to determine when the masking of deleterious alleles favors the evolution of a dominant diploid phase in organisms that alternate between haploid and diploid phases ("alternation of generations"). It is hypothesized that diploidy will be favored whenever masking occurs ("the masking hypothesis"). Using analytical methods, we confirm that this masking hypothesis is essentially correct under free recombination: as long as the heterozygous expression of deleterious alleles is sufficiently masked by the wild-type allele, diploidy is favored over haploidy. When the rate of recombination is lower, however, diploidy is much less likely to be favored over haploidy. In fact, according to our model, the evolution of diploidy is impossible without significant levels of recombination even when masking is fairly strong.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1628815      PMCID: PMC1205045     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  8 in total

1.  Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; J F Crow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evolution. When to be diploid.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Transition from haploidy to diploidy.

Authors:  V Perrot; S Richerd; M Valéro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Deleterious mutations and the origin of the meiotic ploidy cycle.

Authors:  B O Bengtsson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  On the origin of meiotic reproduction: a genetic modifier model.

Authors:  M K Uyenoyama; B O Bengtsson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  The evolution of dominance: a direct approach through the theory of linkage and selection.

Authors:  M W Feldman; S Karlin
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Genetic diversity and structure in Escherichia coli populations.

Authors:  R K Selander; B R Levin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  45 in total

1.  The role of population size, pleiotropy and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of overlapping gene functions.

Authors:  A Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The origin of alternation of generations in land plants: a focus on matrotrophy and hexose transport.

Authors:  L K Graham; L W Wilcox
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The evolution of haploid, diploid and polymorphic haploid-diploid life cycles: the role of meiotic mutation.

Authors:  D W Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development.

Authors:  Michael T Raissig; Célia Baroux; Ueli Grossniklaus
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Host-parasite interactions and the evolution of ploidy.

Authors:  Scott L Nuismer; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The effect of genetic conflict on genomic imprinting and modification of expression at a sex-linked locus.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Marcus W Feldman; Andrew G Clark; Anton E Weisstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Co-infection weakens selection against epistatic mutations in RNA viruses.

Authors:  Rémy Froissart; Claus O Wilke; Rebecca Montville; Susanna K Remold; Lin Chao; Paul E Turner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Androgenesis: a review through the study of the selfish shellfish Corbicula spp.

Authors:  L-M Pigneur; S M Hedtke; E Etoundi; K Van Doninck
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Evolutionary genetic models of the ovarian time bomb hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Anton E Weisstein; Marcus W Feldman; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.