Literature DB >> 17483409

Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance and genetic drift.

Christoph R Haag1, Denis Roze.   

Abstract

In diploid organisms, sexual reproduction rearranges allelic combinations between loci (recombination) as well as within loci (segregation). Several studies have analyzed the effect of segregation on the genetic load due to recurrent deleterious mutations, but considered infinite populations, thus neglecting the effects of genetic drift. Here, we use single-locus models to explore the combined effects of segregation, selection, and drift. We find that, for partly recessive deleterious alleles, segregation affects both the deterministic component of the change in allele frequencies and the stochastic component due to drift. As a result, we find that the mutation load may be far greater in asexuals than in sexuals in finite and/or subdivided populations. In finite populations, this effect arises primarily because, in the absence of segregation, heterozygotes may reach high frequencies due to drift, while homozygotes are still efficiently selected against; this is not possible with segregation, as matings between heterozygotes constantly produce new homozygotes. If deleterious alleles are partly, but not fully recessive, this causes an excess load in asexuals at intermediate population sizes. In subdivided populations without extinction, drift mostly occurs locally, which reduces the efficiency of selection in both sexuals and asexuals, but does not lead to global fixation. Yet, local drift is stronger in asexuals than in sexuals, leading to a higher mutation load in asexuals. In metapopulations with turnover, global drift becomes again important, leading to similar results as in finite, unstructured populations. Overall, the mutation load that arises through the absence of segregation in asexuals may greatly exceed previous predictions that ignored genetic drift.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17483409      PMCID: PMC1931546          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.073080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  52 in total

1.  Mutation-selection balance, dominance and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  J R Chasnov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure?

Authors:  F Rousset
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Selection for recombination in small populations.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Genetic load in subdivided populations: interactions between the migration rate, the size and the number of subpopulations.

Authors:  K Theodorou; D Couvet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Lethals in subdivided populations.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Transitions to asexuality result in excess amino acid substitutions.

Authors:  Susanne Paland; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Our load of mutations.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The effective size of a subdivided population.

Authors:  M C Whitlock; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  17 in total

1.  Selective advantage for sexual reproduction with random haploid fusion.

Authors:  Emmanuel Tannenbaum
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Relative effects of segregation and recombination on the evolution of sex in finite diploid populations.

Authors:  X Jiang; S Hu; Q Xu; Y Chang; S Tao
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Deleterious mutations and selection for sex in finite diploid populations.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Richard E Michod
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic diversity and fitness in small populations of partially asexual, self-incompatible plants.

Authors:  M Navascués; S Stoeckel; S Mariette
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Asexual but Not Clonal: Evolutionary Processes in Automictic Populations.

Authors:  Jan Engelstädter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  An Evolving Genetic Architecture Interacts with Hill-Robertson Interference to Determine the Benefit of Sex.

Authors:  Alexander O B Whitlock; Kayla M Peck; Ricardo B R Azevedo; Christina L Burch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Synergy from reproductive division of labor and genetic complexity drive the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Klaus Jaffe
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.365

8.  Neutral and Selective Processes Drive Population Differentiation for Iris hexagona.

Authors:  Jennafer A P Hamlin; Michael L Arnold
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Cryptic variation between species and the basis of hybrid performance.

Authors:  Ulises Rosas; Nick H Barton; Lucy Copsey; Pierre Barbier de Reuille; Enrico Coen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females.

Authors:  Martin A Mallet; Jessica M Bouchard; Christopher M Kimber; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.