Literature DB >> 17360283

Mitotic recombination counteracts the benefits of genetic segregation.

Mohammad A Mandegar1, Sarah P Otto.   

Abstract

The ubiquity of sexual reproduction despite its cost has lead to an extensive body of research on the evolution and maintenance of sexual reproduction. Previous work has suggested that sexual reproduction can substantially speed up the rate of adaptation in diploid populations, because sexual populations are able to produce the fittest homozygous genotype by segregation and mating of heterozygous individuals. In contrast, asexual populations must wait for two rare mutational events, one producing a heterozygous carrier and the second converting a heterozygous to a homozygous carrier, before a beneficial mutation can become fixed. By avoiding this additional waiting time, it was shown that the benefits of segregation could overcome a twofold cost of sex. This previous result ignores mitotic recombination (MR), however. Here, we show that MR significantly hastens the spread of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Indeed, given empirical data on MR, we find that adaptation in asexual populations proceeds as fast as that in sexual populations, especially when beneficial alleles are partially recessive. We conclude that asexual populations can gain most of the benefit of segregation through MR while avoiding the costs associated with sexual reproduction.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360283      PMCID: PMC2176173          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

Review 1.  Do bacteria have sex?

Authors:  R J Redfield
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Recessive mutations and the maintenance of sex in structured populations.

Authors:  A F Agrawal; J R Chasnov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  The maintenance of sex in parasites.

Authors:  Alison P Galvani; Ronald M Coleman; Neil M Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Segregation and the evolution of sex under overdominant selection.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  The prevalence and evolution of sex in microorganisms.

Authors:  Jianping Xu
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.166

8.  Before crossing over: the advantages of eukaryotic sex in genomes lacking chiasmatic recombination.

Authors:  M A Antezana; R R Hudson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Mitotic recombination and genetic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation.

Authors:  S Puig; A Querol; E Barrio; J E Pérez-Ortín
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Félix Prado; Felipe Cortés-Ledesma; Pablo Huertas; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 3.886

View more
  34 in total

1.  Coalescence with Background and Balancing Selection in Systems with Bi- and Uniparental Reproduction: Contrasting Partial Asexuality and Selfing.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Matthew Hartfield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Deleterious mutations and selection for sex in finite diploid populations.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Richard E Michod
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Extreme resistance of bdelloid rotifers to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Eugene Gladyshev; Matthew Meselson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: roles of intracellular coevolution.

Authors:  Thomas Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.540

5.  Does the avoidance of sexual costs increase fitness in asexual invaders?

Authors:  Claus-Peter Stelzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Adaptation by Loss of Heterozygosity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Clones Under Divergent Selection.

Authors:  Timothy Y James; Lucas A Michelotti; Alexander D Glasco; Rebecca A Clemons; Robert A Powers; Ellen S James; D Rabern Simmons; Fengyan Bai; Shuhua Ge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Asexual but Not Clonal: Evolutionary Processes in Automictic Populations.

Authors:  Jan Engelstädter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Diploidy and the selective advantage for sexual reproduction in unicellular organisms.

Authors:  Maya Kleiman; Emmanuel Tannenbaum
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.919

9.  DNA transposons and the role of recombination in mutation accumulation in Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Sarah Schaack; Eunjin Choi; Michael Lynch; Ellen J Pritham
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Rapid global expansion of the fungal disease chytridiomycosis into declining and healthy amphibian populations.

Authors:  Timothy Y James; Anastasia P Litvintseva; Rytas Vilgalys; Jess A T Morgan; John W Taylor; Matthew C Fisher; Lee Berger; Ché Weldon; Louis du Preez; Joyce E Longcore
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 6.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.