Literature DB >> 11063713

Mutation-selection balance, dominance and the maintenance of sex.

J R Chasnov1.   

Abstract

A leading hypothesis for the evolutionary function of sex postulates that sex is an adaptation that purges deleterious mutations from the genome, thereby increasing the equilibrium mean fitness of a sexual population relative to its asexual competitor. This hypothesis requires two necessary conditions: first, the mutation rate per genome must be of order one, and, second, multiple mutations within a genome must act with positive epistasis, that is, two or more mutations of different genes must be more harmful together than if they acted independently. Here, by reconsidering the theory of mutation-selection balance at a single diploid gene locus, we demonstrate a significant advantage of sex due to nearly recessive mutations provided the mutation rate per genome is of order one. The assumption of positive epistasis is unnecessary, and multiple mutations may be assumed to act independently.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11063713      PMCID: PMC1461328     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  9 in total

1.  Our load of mutations.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Why sex and recombination?

Authors:  N H Barton; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria.

Authors:  S F Elena; R E Lenski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolutionary genetics. The muddle about mutations.

Authors:  J R Peck; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  M Kirkpatrick; C D Jenkins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 7.  Advantages of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1994

8.  The molecular basis of dominance.

Authors:  H Kacser; J A Burns
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Selection against harmful mutations in large sexual and asexual populations.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.588

  9 in total
  19 in total

1.  Recessive mutations and the maintenance of sex in structured populations.

Authors:  A F Agrawal; J R Chasnov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Segregation and the evolution of sex under overdominant selection.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Influence of dominance, leptokurtosis and pleiotropy of deleterious mutations on quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Widespread correlations between dominance and homozygous effects of mutations: implications for theories of dominance.

Authors:  Nitin Phadnis; James D Fry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Mitotic recombination counteracts the benefits of genetic segregation.

Authors:  Mohammad A Mandegar; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance and genetic drift.

Authors:  Christoph R Haag; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The evolution of condition-dependent sex in the face of high costs.

Authors:  Lilach Hadany; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.