Literature DB >> 12826616

Quantitative modeling of sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis: the role of coupling among different chemoreceptor species.

Bernardo A Mello1, Yuhai Tu.   

Abstract

We propose a general theoretical framework for modeling receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis, taking into account receptor interactions, including those among different receptor species. We show that our model can quantitatively explain the recent in vivo measurements of receptor sensitivity at different ligand concentrations for both mutant and wild-type strains. For mutant strains, our model can fit the experimental data exactly. For the wild-type cell, our model is capable of achieving high gain while having modest values of Hill coefficient for the response curves. Furthermore, the high sensitivity of the wild-type cell in our model is maintained for a wide range of ambient ligand concentrations, facilitated by near-perfect adaptation and dependence of ligand binding on receptor activity. Our study reveals the importance of coupling among different chemoreceptor species, in particular strong interactions between the aspartate (Tar) and serine (Tsr) receptors, which is crucial in explaining both the mutant and wild-type data. Predictions for the sensitivity of other mutant strains and possible improvements of our model for the wild-type cell are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12826616      PMCID: PMC166210          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1330839100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  20 in total

1.  Covalent modification regulates ligand binding to receptor complexes in the chemosensory system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G Li; R M Weis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation.

Authors:  A Bren; M Eisenbach
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Molecular model of a lattice of signalling proteins involved in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  T S Shimizu; N Le Novère; M D Levin; A J Beavil; B J Sutton; D Bray
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Cooperativity between bacterial chemotaxis receptors.

Authors:  Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Receptor methylation controls the magnitude of stimulus-response coupling in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Mikhail N Levit; Jeffry B Stock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  A free-energy-based stochastic simulation of the Tar receptor complex.

Authors:  C J Morton-Firth; T S Shimizu; D Bray
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-03-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  The two-component signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes.

Authors:  J J Falke; R B Bass; S L Butler; S A Chervitz; M A Danielson
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 13.827

8.  Determinants of chemotactic signal amplification in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C Kim; M Jackson; R Lux; S Khan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity.

Authors:  D Bray; M D Levin; C J Morton-Firth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Evidence that both ligand binding and covalent adaptation drive a two-state equilibrium in the aspartate receptor signaling complex.

Authors:  J A Bornhorst; J J Falke
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Responding to chemical gradients: bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 8.382

2.  Crosslinking snapshots of bacterial chemoreceptor squads.

Authors:  Claudia A Studdert; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of receptor interaction in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Leah Shaw; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Physical limits on cellular sensing of spatial gradients.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Wen Chen; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Herbert Levine
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes: understanding bacterial chemotaxis responses to multiple stimuli.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Chemosensing in Escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors.

Authors:  Juan E Keymer; Robert G Endres; Monica Skoge; Yigal Meir; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Physical responses of bacterial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  Ady Vaknin; Howard C Berg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Effects of adaptation in maintaining high sensitivity over a wide range of backgrounds for Escherichia coli chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Statistical mechanics of Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) models.

Authors:  Sarah Marzen; Hernan G Garcia; Rob Phillips
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: signal amplification and accurate adaptation.

Authors:  Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.