Literature DB >> 11723162

Evidence that both ligand binding and covalent adaptation drive a two-state equilibrium in the aspartate receptor signaling complex.

J A Bornhorst1, J J Falke.   

Abstract

The transmembrane aspartate receptor of bacterial chemotaxis regulates an associated kinase protein in response to both attractant binding to the receptor periplasmic domain and covalent modification of four adaptation sites on the receptor cytoplasmic domain. The existence of at least 16 covalent modification states raises the question of how many stable signaling conformations exist. In the simplest case, the receptor could have just two stable conformations ("on" and "off") yielding the two-state behavior of a toggle-switch. Alternatively, covalent modification could incrementally shift the receptor between many more than two stable conformations, thereby allowing the receptor to function as a rheostatic switch. An important distinction between these models is that the observed functional parameters of a toggle-switch receptor could strongly covary as covalent modification shifts the equilibrium between the on- and off-states, due to population-weighted averaging of the intrinsic on- and off-state parameters. By contrast, covalent modification of a rheostatic receptor would create new conformational states with completely independent parameters. To resolve the toggle-switch and rheostat models, the present study has generated all 16 homogeneous covalent modification states of the receptor adaptation sites, and has compared their effects on the attractant affinity and kinase activity of the reconstituted receptor-kinase signaling complex. This approach reveals that receptor covalent modification modulates both attractant affinity and kinase activity up to 100-fold, respectively. The regulatory effects of individual adaptation sites are not perfectly additive, indicating synergistic interactions between sites. The three adaptation sites at positions 295, 302, and 309 are more important than the site at position 491 in regulating attractant affinity and kinase activity, thereby explaining the previously observed dominance of the former three sites in in vivo studies. The most notable finding is that covalent modification of the adaptation sites alters the receptor attractant affinity and the receptor-regulated kinase activity in a highly correlated fashion, strongly supporting the toggle-switch model. Similarly, certain mutations that drive the receptor into the kinase activating state are found to have correlated effects on attractant affinity. Together these results provide strong evidence that chemotaxis receptors possess just two stable signaling conformations and that the equilibrium between these pure on- and off-states is modulated by both attractant binding and covalent adaptation. It follows that the attractant and adaptation signals drive the same conformational change between the two settings of a toggle. An approach that quantifies the fractional occupancy of the on- and off-states is illustrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11723162      PMCID: PMC2229510          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.118.6.693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  86 in total

1.  Single cyclic nucleotide-gated channels locked in different ligand-bound states.

Authors:  M L Ruiz; J W Karpen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Bacterial chemotaxis: the five sensors of a bacterium.

Authors:  T W Grebe; J Stock
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-02-26       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Chimeric chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli: signaling properties of Tar-Tap and Tap-Tar hybrids.

Authors:  S Weerasuriya; B M Schneider; M D Manson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  The two-component signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes.

Authors:  J J Falke; R B Bass; S L Butler; S A Chervitz; M A Danielson
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  Methylation of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptors: intra- and interdimer mechanisms.

Authors:  H Le Moual; T Quang; D E Koshland
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-10-28       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Suppressor mutation analysis of the sensory rhodopsin I-transducer complex: insights into the color-sensing mechanism.

Authors:  K H Jung; J L Spudich
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  The serine chemoreceptor from Escherichia coli is methylated through an inter-dimer process.

Authors:  J Li; G Li; R M Weis
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-09-30       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity.

Authors:  D Bray; M D Levin; C J Morton-Firth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Hippocampal GABA(A) channel conductance increased by diazepam.

Authors:  M Eghbali; J P Curmi; B Birnir; P W Gage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-07-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cysteine and disulfide scanning reveals a regulatory alpha-helix in the cytoplasmic domain of the aspartate receptor.

Authors:  M A Danielson; R B Bass; J J Falke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-12-26       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  44 in total

1.  Cooperativity between bacterial chemotaxis receptors.

Authors:  Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Perfect and near-perfect adaptation in a model of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Quantitative analysis of aspartate receptor signaling complex reveals that the homogeneous two-state model is inadequate: development of a heterogeneous two-state model.

Authors:  Joshua A Bornhorst; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Crosslinking snapshots of bacterial chemoreceptor squads.

Authors:  Claudia A Studdert; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of receptor interaction in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Leah Shaw; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Mutational analysis of the chemoreceptor-coupling domain of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis signaling kinase CheA.

Authors:  Jinshi Zhao; John S Parkinson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Physical responses of bacterial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  Ady Vaknin; Howard C Berg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Effects of adaptation in maintaining high sensitivity over a wide range of backgrounds for Escherichia coli chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Structure, function, and on-off switching of a core unit contact between CheA kinase and CheW adaptor protein in the bacterial chemosensory array: A disulfide mapping and mutagenesis study.

Authors:  Andrew M Natale; Jane L Duplantis; Kene N Piasta; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.