Literature DB >> 11243808

Determinants of chemotactic signal amplification in Escherichia coli.

C Kim1, M Jackson, R Lux, S Khan.   

Abstract

A well-characterized protein phosphorelay mediates Escherichia coli chemotaxis towards the amino acid attractant aspartate. The protein CheY shuttles between flagellar motors and methyl-accepting chemoreceptor (MCP) complexes containing the linker CheW and the kinase CheA. CheA-CheY phosphotransfer generates phospho-CheY, CheY-P. Aspartate triggers smooth swim responses by inactivation of the CheA bound to the target MCP, Tar; but this mechanism alone cannot explain the observed response sensitivity. Here, we used behavioral analysis of mutants deleted for CheZ, a catalyst of CheY-P dephosphorylation, or the methyltransferase CheR and/or the methylesterase CheB to examine the roles of accelerated CheY-P dephosphorylation and MCP methylation in enhancement of the chemotactic response. The extreme motile bias of the mutants was adjusted towards wild-type values, while preserving much of the aspartate response sensitivity by expressing fragments of the MCP, Tsr, that either activate or inhibit CheA. We then measured responses to small jumps of aspartate, generated by flash photolysis of photo-labile precursors. The stimulus-response relation for Delta cheZ mutants overlapped that for the host strains. Delta cheZ excitation response times increased with stimulus size consistent with formation of an occluded CheA state. Thus, neither CheZ-dependent or independent increases in CheY-P dephosphorylation contribute to the excitation response. In Delta cheB Delta cheR or Delta cheR mutants, the dose for a half-maximal response, [Asp](50), was ca 10 microM; but was elevated to 100 microM in Delta cheB mutants. In addition, the stimulus-response relation for these mutants was linear, consistent with stoichiometric inactivation, in contrast to the non-linear relation for wild-type E. coli. These data suggest that response sensitivity is controlled by differential binding of CheR and/or CheB to distinct MCP signaling conformations. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11243808     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  24 in total

1.  Bacterial chemotaxis and the question of gain.

Authors:  Dennis Bray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cooperativity between bacterial chemotaxis receptors.

Authors:  Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dynamic and clustering model of bacterial chemotaxis receptors: structural basis for signaling and high sensitivity.

Authors:  Sung-Hou Kim; Weiru Wang; Kyeong Kyu Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The fast tumble signal in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Shahid Khan; Sanjay Jain; Gordon P Reid; David R Trentham
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Differential activation of Escherichia coli chemoreceptors by blue-light stimuli.

Authors:  Stuart Wright; Bharat Walia; John S Parkinson; Shahid Khan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  An unorthodox sensory adaptation site in the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor.

Authors:  Xue-Sheng Han; John S Parkinson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Methylation of aquaporins in plant plasma membrane.

Authors:  Véronique Santoni; Lionel Verdoucq; Nicolas Sommerer; Joëlle Vinh; Delphine Pflieger; Christophe Maurel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Dynamic receptor team formation can explain the high signal transduction gain in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Réka Albert; Yu-Wen Chiu; Hans G Othmer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.