Literature DB >> 12011417

Cooperativity between bacterial chemotaxis receptors.

Joseph J Falke1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12011417      PMCID： PMC124436          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.112214199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  32 in total

1.  Receptor interactions through phosphorylation and methylation pathways in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  D A Sanders; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Global flexibility in a sensory receptor: a site-directed cross-linking approach.

Authors:  J J Falke; D E Koshland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J E Segall; S M Block; H C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Three-dimensional structures of the ligand-binding domain of the bacterial aspartate receptor with and without a ligand.

Authors:  M V Milburn; G G Privé; D L Milligan; W G Scott; J Yeh; J Jancarik; D E Koshland; S H Kim
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The serine receptor of bacterial chemotaxis exhibits half-site saturation for serine binding.

Authors:  L N Lin; J Li; J F Brandts; R M Weis
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-05-31       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell.

Authors:  J R Maddock; L Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The three-dimensional structure of the ligand-binding domain of a wild-type bacterial chemotaxis receptor. Structural comparison to the cross-linked mutant forms and conformational changes upon ligand binding.

Authors:  J I Yeh; H P Biemann; J Pandit; D E Koshland; S H Kim
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-05-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Constitutively signaling fragments of Tsr, the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor.

Authors:  P Ames; J S Parkinson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Aspartate receptors of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium bind ligand with negative and half-of-the-sites cooperativity.

Authors:  H P Biemann; D E Koshland
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-01-25       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Attractant- and disulfide-induced conformational changes in the ligand binding domain of the chemotaxis aspartate receptor: a 19F NMR study.

Authors:  M A Danielson; H P Biemann; D E Koshland; J J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-05-24       Impact factor: 3.162
View more
  10 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of aspartate receptor signaling complex reveals that the homogeneous two-state model is inadequate: development of a heterogeneous two-state model.

Authors:  Joshua A Bornhorst; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Mapping out regions on the surface of the aspartate receptor that are essential for kinase activation.

Authors:  Ryan S Mehan; Noah C White; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Conserved glycine residues in the cytoplasmic domain of the aspartate receptor play essential roles in kinase coupling and on-off switching.

Authors:  Matthew D Coleman; Randal B Bass; Ryan S Mehan; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Arabidopsis ETR1 and ERS1 differentially repress the ethylene response in combination with other ethylene receptor genes.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Chi-Kuang Wen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Combined effects of blood and temperature shift on Borrelia burgdorferi gene expression as determined by whole genome DNA array.

Authors:  Rafal Tokarz; Julie M Anderton; Laura I Katona; Jorge L Benach
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Arabidopsis seedling growth response and recovery to ethylene. A kinetic analysis.

Authors:  Brad M Binder; Ronan C O'malley; Wuyi Wang; Jeannette M Moore; Brian M Parks; Edgar P Spalding; Anthony B Bleecker
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Quantitative modeling of sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis: the role of coupling among different chemoreceptor species.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Dose-Response Analysis of Chemotactic Signaling Response in Salmonella typhimurium LT2 upon Exposure to Cysteine/Cystine Redox Pair.

Authors:  Bob T Rosier; Milena D Lazova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Novel prokaryotic system employing previously unknown nucleic acids-based receptors.

Authors:  Victor Tetz; George Tetz
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 6.352

10.  Stable Pom1 clusters form a glucose-modulated concentration gradient that regulates mitotic entry.

Authors:  Corey A H Allard; Hannah E Opalko; James B Moseley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.