Literature DB >> 12795477

On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect.

Jan De Houwer1.   

Abstract

Stroop effects might be due to differences in stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) and/or to differences in stimulus-stimulus compatibility (SSC). Recent evidence for the role of SSC is inconclusive, because there were no controls for effects of SRC that are based on short-term associations between stimuli and responses (i.e., associations set up as the result of task instructions). In two experiments, SRC effects were controlled for. Regardless of whether the irrelevant and the relevant stimulus features were separated (Experiment 1) or integrated in one stimulus (Experiment 2), the results revealed an effect of SSC and an effect of SRC that was based on short-term associations. The results thus confirm that both processes at the level of encoding and processes at the level of response selection contribute to the Stroop effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12795477     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  H H Zhang; J Zhang; S Kornblum
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  J D Cohen; K Dunbar; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.

Authors:  W R Glaser; M O Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1989-03

5.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

Review 6.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli.

Authors:  H Zhang; S Kornblum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task.

Authors:  H S Hock; H Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-02

9.  Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.

Authors:  R A Virzi; H E Egeth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-07

10.  The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect.

Authors:  M Tagliabue; M Zorzi; C Umiltà; F Bassignani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total
  46 in total

1.  Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Evan F Risko; James R Schmidt; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

2.  Does response modality influence conflict? Modelling vocal and manual response Stroop interference.

Authors:  Alex Fennell; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Preparatory neural activity predicts performance on a conflict task.

Authors:  Emily R Stern; Tor D Wager; Tobias Egner; Joy Hirsch; Jennifer A Mangels
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Parsing the Flanker task to reveal behavioral and oscillatory correlates of unattended conflict interference.

Authors:  Marcella Brunetti; Filippo Zappasodi; Pierpaolo Croce; Rosalia Di Matteo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Hedderik van Rijn; Jelmer P Borst
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

7.  The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-06-23

8.  A functional dissociation of conflict processing within anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Chobok Kim; James K Kroger; Jeounghoon Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Best not to bet on the horserace: A comment on Forrin and MacLeod (2017) and a relevant stimulus-response compatibility view of colour-word contingency learning asymmetries.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

10.  Cognitive control influences the use of meaning relations during spoken sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Debra L Long; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.