Literature DB >> 18189011

Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control.

Tobias Egner1.   

Abstract

Congruency effects in selective attention tasks are subject to sequential modulation: They are smaller following an incongruent stimulus than following a congruent one. This congruency sequence effect has been interpreted as reflecting conflict-driven adjustments in cognitive control (conflict adaptation) or, alternatively, episodic memory effects of stimulus-response association (feature integration). The present article critically reviews support for these rival accounts in the experimental literature and discusses the implications thereof for assessing behavioral and neural signatures of cognitive control processes. It is argued that both conflict adaptation and feature integration contribute to the congruency sequence effect but that their respective contributions can be isolated experimentally. Studies that have pursued this isolation strategy have gained important insights into cognitive control processes. Finally, other factors, such as expectancies, may also contribute to the congruency sequence effect, and thus their potential role needs to be carefully examined and, if found significant, integrated into current models of cognitive control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18189011     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.7.4.380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  56 in total

1.  The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict.

Authors:  M P Milham; M T Banich; A Webb; V Barad; N J Cohen; T Wszalek; A F Kramer
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-12

2.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh; Paul Laurey
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Birgit Stürmer; Hartmut Leuthold; Eric Soetens; Hannes Schröter; Werner Sommer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Vincent van Veen; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Wim Notebaert; Baptist Liefooghe; André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

7.  Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects.

Authors:  Wim Notebaert; Wim Gevers; Frederick Verbruggen; Baptist Liefooghe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

8.  Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming?

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; John F Stins; Danielle Posthuma; Tinca J C Polderman; Dorret I Boomsma; Eco J de Geus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

9.  Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala.

Authors:  Amit Etkin; Tobias Egner; Daniel M Peraza; Eric R Kandel; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04
View more
  176 in total

1.  Adaptation to conflict via context-driven anticipatory signals in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Guillermo Horga; Tiago V Maia; Pengwei Wang; Zhishun Wang; Rachel Marsh; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation.

Authors:  J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

3.  Working memory demands modulate cognitive control in the Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-06

4.  Trait anxiety and dynamic adjustments in conflict processing.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Nina Alexander; Helge Gebhardt; Juergen Hennig
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Increasing negative emotions by reappraisal enhances subsequent cognitive control: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Jason S Moser; Steven B Most; Robert F Simons
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  If it's hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-01-06

7.  Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28

8.  Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.

Authors:  Magali Kreutzfeldt; Denise N Stephan; Klaus Willmes; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

9.  Hand posture and cognitive control: The congruency sequence effect is reduced near the hands.

Authors:  Julia Englert; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

10.  Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Authors:  Megan Zirnstein; Janet G van Hell; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.