Literature DB >> 9483821

The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli.

H Zhang1, S Kornblum.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether and how stimulus-stimulus (SS) and stimulus-response (SR) consistency and SR congruence effects combine to produce the Stroop effect. Two experiments were conducted with 4-choice tasks in which SS and SR consistency and SR congruence effects were examined in isolation as well as in the Stroop task. The experiments were so designed as to remove the confound between SS and SR consistency that is ordinarily found in standard Stroop tasks and to pit SS consistency against the logical recording hypothesis (A. Hedge & N. W. A. Marsh, 1975). The results indicate that SS and SR consistency both contribute to the Stroop effect and that they interact. This finding supports models such as the dimensional overlap model (e.g., S. Kornblum & J. W. Lee, 1995) that distinguish between SS and SR overlap. Simulation results from an interactive activation network, modeled after the dimensional overlap model, provide reasonable fits to the experimental data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9483821     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  28 in total

1.  Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

3.  Spatial Simon effects with nonspatial responses.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

4.  Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.

Authors:  O V Lungu; T Wächter; T Liu; D T Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies.

Authors:  Blas Espinoza-Varas; Hyunsook Jang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-17

6.  Item-specific congruency effects in nonverbal auditory Stroop.

Authors:  Launa C Leboe; Todd A Mondor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-25

7.  Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Evan F Risko; James R Schmidt; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

8.  Preparatory neural activity predicts performance on a conflict task.

Authors:  Emily R Stern; Tor D Wager; Tobias Egner; Joy Hirsch; Jennifer A Mangels
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Best not to bet on the horserace: A comment on Forrin and MacLeod (2017) and a relevant stimulus-response compatibility view of colour-word contingency learning asymmetries.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.