Literature DB >> 22842106

Cognitive control influences the use of meaning relations during spoken sentence comprehension.

Megan A Boudewyn1, Debra L Long, Tamara Y Swaab.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate individual differences in the influence of lexical association on word recognition during auditory sentence processing. Lexical associations among individual words (e.g. salt and pepper) represent one type of semantic information that is available during the processing of words in context. We predicted that individuals would vary in their sensitivity to this type of local context as a function of suppression ability and working-memory capacity. Lexical association was manipulated in auditory sentence contexts, and multiple regression analyses were employed to examine the relation between individuals' brain responses to meaning relations in sentences and measures of working-memory capacity, cognitive control and vocabulary. Lexical association influenced the processing of words that were embedded in sentences and also showed a great deal of individual variability. Specifically, suppression ability emerged as a significant predictor of sensitivity to lexical association, such that individuals who performed poorly on our measure of suppression ability (the Stroop task), compared to those who performed well, showed larger N400 effects of lexical association. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22842106      PMCID: PMC4780850          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  45 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Comprehension skill and global coherence: a paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders' abilities.

Authors:  D L Long; J L Chong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures.

Authors:  Gloria S Waters; David Caplan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-11

Review 4.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Vincent van Veen; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Right hemisphere sensitivity to word- and sentence-level context: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Seana Coulson; Kara D Federmeier; Cyma Van Petten; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

8.  Two Decades of Structure Building.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  1997-01

9.  Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400.

Authors:  J J van Berkum; P Hagoort; C M Brown
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Does Discourse Congruence Influence Spoken Language Comprehension before Lexical Association? Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Peter C Gordon; Debra Long; Lara Polse; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011-10-25
View more
  9 in total

1.  Lumos!: Electrophysiological tracking of (wizarding) world knowledge use during reading.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  To catch a Snitch: Brain potentials reveal variability in the functional organization of (fictional) world knowledge during reading.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Word-Decoding Skill Interacts With Working Memory Capacity to Influence Inference Generation During Reading.

Authors:  Stephen Hamilton; Erin Freed; Debra L Long
Journal:  Read Res Q       Date:  2016-05-09

4.  Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Authors:  Megan Zirnstein; Janet G van Hell; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-03-20

5.  Spared and impaired spoken discourse processing in schizophrenia: effects of local and global language context.

Authors:  Tamara Y Swaab; Megan A Boudewyn; Debra L Long; Steve J Luck; Ann M Kring; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath; Tyler Lesh; Tara Niendam; Marjorie Solomon; George R Mangun; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Harry Potter and the Chamber of What?: The impact of what individuals know on word processing during reading.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 7.  Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension.

Authors:  Shruti Dave; Trevor Brothers; Liv J Hoversten; Matthew J Traxler; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.610

8.  Effects of working memory span on processing of lexical associations and congruence in spoken discourse.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Debra L Long; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-13

9.  Context-Sensitivity and Individual Differences in the Derivation of Scalar Implicature.

Authors:  Xiao Yang; Utako Minai; Robert Fiorentino
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.