Literature DB >> 17889835

Preparatory neural activity predicts performance on a conflict task.

Emily R Stern1, Tor D Wager, Tobias Egner, Joy Hirsch, Jennifer A Mangels.   

Abstract

Advance preparation has been shown to improve the efficiency of conflict resolution. Yet, with little empirical work directly linking preparatory neural activity to the performance benefits of advance cueing, it is not clear whether this relationship results from preparatory activation of task-specific networks, or from activity associated with general alerting processes. Here, fMRI data were acquired during a spatial Stroop task in which advance cues either informed subjects of the upcoming relevant feature of conflict stimuli (spatial or semantic) or were neutral. Informative cues decreased reaction time (RT) relative to neutral cues, and cues indicating that spatial information would be task-relevant elicited greater activity than neutral cues in multiple areas, including right anterior prefrontal and bilateral parietal cortex. Additionally, preparatory activation in bilateral parietal cortex and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predicted faster RT when subjects responded to spatial location. No regions were found to be specific to semantic cues at conventional thresholds, and lowering the threshold further revealed little overlap between activity associated with spatial and semantic cueing effects, thereby demonstrating a single dissociation between activations related to preparing a spatial versus semantic task-set. This relationship between preparatory activation of spatial processing networks and efficient conflict resolution suggests that advance information can benefit performance by leading to domain-specific biasing of task-relevant information.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17889835      PMCID: PMC2288660          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  65 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention.

Authors:  B Giesbrecht; M G Woldorff; A W Song; G R Mangun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; John Jonides; Susan Reading
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity.

Authors:  Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Marina Bedny; Robert F Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

5.  The functional anatomy of word comprehension and production.

Authors:  C J Price
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees?

Authors:  G R Fink; P W Halligan; J C Marshall; C D Frith; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Selecting among competing alternatives: selection and retrieval in the left inferior frontal gyrus.

Authors:  H E Moss; S Abdallah; P Fletcher; P Bright; L Pilgrim; K Acres; L K Tyler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

Review 9.  Neural bases of learning and memory: functional neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  R Cabeza; L Nyberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.710

10.  Orienting attention to semantic categories.

Authors:  Tamara C Cristescu; Joseph T Devlin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  6 in total

1.  Prefrontal-subcortical pathways mediating successful emotion regulation.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Matthew L Davidson; Brent L Hughes; Martin A Lindquist; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Reward favors the prepared: Incentive and task-informative cues interact to enhance attentional control.

Authors:  Kimberly S Chiew; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Double dissociation between action-driven and perception-driven conflict resolution invoking anterior versus posterior brain systems.

Authors:  Tilman Schulte; Eva M Müller-Oehring; Shara Vinco; Fumiko Hoeft; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates Dialectical Self-Thinking.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Kaiping Peng; Yang Bai; Rui Li; Ying Zhu; Pei Sun; Hua Guo; Chun Yuan; Pia Rotshtein; Jie Sui
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11

5.  BOLD correlates of trial-by-trial reaction time variability in gray and white matter: a multi-study fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni; Deanna M Barch; Jeremy R Gray; Thomas E Conturo; Todd S Braver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Functional Roles of Neural Preparatory Processes in a Cued Stroop Task Revealed by Linking Electrophysiology with Behavioral Performance.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Mingzhou Ding; Benzi M Kluger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.