Literature DB >> 2200075

On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.

J D Cohen1, K Dunbar, J L McClelland.   

Abstract

Traditional views of automaticity are in need of revision. For example, automaticity often has been treated as an all-or-none phenomenon, and traditional theories have held that automatic processes are independent of attention. Yet recent empirical data suggest that automatic processes are continuous, and furthermore are subject to attentional control. A model of attention is presented to address these issues. Within a parallel distributed processing framework, it is proposed that the attributes of automaticity depend on the strength of a processing pathway and that strength increases with training. With the Stroop effect as an example, automatic processes are shown to be continuous and to emerge gradually with practice. Specifically, a computational model of the Stroop task simulates the time course of processing as well as the effects of learning. This was accomplished by combining the cascade mechanism described by McClelland (1979) with the backpropagation learning algorithm (Rumelhart, Hinton, & Williams, 1986). The model can simulate performance in the standard Stroop task, as well as aspects of performance in variants of this task that manipulate stimulus-onset asynchrony, response set, and degree of practice. The model presented is contrasted against other models, and its relation to many of the central issues in the literature on attention, automaticity, and interference is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2200075     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  385 in total

1.  Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete?

Authors:  S Monsell; T J Taylor; K Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  The reverse Stroop effect.

Authors:  F H Durgin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

3.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  C S Carter; A M Macdonald; M Botvinick; L L Ross; V A Stenger; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sentence interference in the Stroop task.

Authors:  A G Brega; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

5.  The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice.

Authors:  A Heathcote; S Brown; D J Mewhort
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

6.  The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the stroop flanker task.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Avishai Henik; Idit Spitzer-Davidson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

7.  Associative priming in color naming: interference and facilitation.

Authors:  J S Burt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

Review 8.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

9.  Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Harold Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: a computational model.

Authors:  M J Frank; B Loughry; R C O'Reilly
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.