Literature DB >> 12739254

Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.

Jocelyn Lockyer1.   

Abstract

Multisource feedback (MSF), or 360-degree employee evaluation, is a questionnaire-based assessment method in which rates are evaluated by peers, patients, and coworkers on key performance behaviors. Although widely used in industrial settings to assess performance, the method is gaining acceptance as a quality improvement method in health systems. This article describes MSF, identifies the key aspects of MSF program design, summarizes some of the salient empirical research in medicine, and discusses possible limitations for MSF as an assessment tool in health care. In industry and in health care, experience suggests that MSF is most likely to succeed and result in changes in performance when attention is paid to structural and psychometric aspects of program design and implementation. A carefully selected steering committee ensures that the behaviors examined are appropriate, the communication package is clear, and the threats posed to individuals are minimized. The instruments that are developed must be tested to ensure that they are reliable, achieve a generalizability coefficient of Ep2 = .70, have face and content validity, and examine variance in performance ratings to understand whether ratings are attributable to how the physician performs and not to factors beyond the physician's control (e.g., gender, age, or setting). Research shows that reliable data can be generated with a reasonable number of respondents, and physicians will use the feedback to contemplate and initiate changes in practice. Performance may be affected by familiarity between rater and ratee and sociodemographic and continuing medical education characteristics; however, little of the variance in performance is explained by factors outside the physician's control. MSF is not a replacement for audit when clinical outcomes need to be assessed. However, when interpersonal, communication, professionalism, or teamwork behaviors need to be assessed and guidance given, it is one of the better tools that may be adopted and implemented to provide feedback and guide performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12739254     DOI: 10.1002/chp.1340230103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  49 in total

1.  Commitment to practice change: an evaluator's perspective.

Authors:  Marianna B Shershneva; Min-fen Wang; Gary C Lindeman; Julia N Savoy; Curtis A Olson
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Multisource feedback in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Eric J Warm; Daniel Schauer; Brian Revis; James R Boex
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-06

3.  Data envelopment analysis model for the appraisal and relative performance evaluation of nurses at an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Ibrahim H Osman; Lynn N Berbary; Yusuf Sidani; Baydaa Al-Ayoubi; Ali Emrouznejad
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.

Authors:  H Davies; N Khera; J Stroobant
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  The role of distance learning in specialist medical training.

Authors:  H Davies; D M B Hall; V Harpin; C Pullan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Use of assessment to reinforce patient safety as a habit.

Authors:  R M Galbraith; M C Holtman; S G Clyman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

Review 7.  The Foundation Programme assessment tools: an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees?

Authors:  S Carr
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Use of Multisource Feedback to Improve Interdisciplinary Care Among Oncologists.

Authors:  Kristen A Catherman; Carl Grey; Malcolm D Mattes
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Problems with using a supervisor's report as a form of summative assessment.

Authors:  Tim J Wilkinson; Winnie B Wade
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Self-Assessment: The Disconnect between Research and Rhetoric.

Authors:  Patricia A Miller
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.