Literature DB >> 16954453

The Foundation Programme assessment tools: an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees?

S Carr1.   

Abstract

The recent change in working patterns of doctors in training has meant that the traditional systems of education are under increasing pressure and that there is the need to maximise new opportunities for learning. One new opportunity may arise after the introduction of the mandatory assessment systems (Mini-CEX, DOPPS, Multi-source feedback, and Case based discussion) in the Foundation Programmes. In this review the new assessment procedures for the Foundation Programmes are outlined and the potential of these assessments (using Mini-CEX as main example) as an opportunity to give feedback to trainees discussed. The importance of feedback in professional development and some of the techniques available for giving feedback are described. The Foundation Programme assessments will occupy a significant amount of trainees' and trainers' time and it is important that opportunity for feedback and learning is maximised.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16954453      PMCID: PMC2585733          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.042366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  16 in total

1.  Enhancing feedback to students using the mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise).

Authors:  K E Hauer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace.

Authors:  L Southgate; J Cox; T David; D Hatch; A Howes; N Johnson; B Jolly; E Macdonald; P McAvoy; P McCrorie; J Turner
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Evaluation of clinical competency.

Authors:  J A DeLisa
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 4.  Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings.

Authors:  William T Branch; Anuradha Paranjape
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Construct validity of the miniclinical evaluation exercise (miniCEX).

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Stephen Huot; Jeff Chung; John Norcini; Richard E Hawkins
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise for internal medicine residency training.

Authors:  Steven J Durning; Lannie J Cation; Ronald J Markert; Louis N Pangaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Assessing the performance of doctors in training.

Authors:  James Wilkinson; Andrea Benjamin; Winnie Wade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-20

8.  Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Monica Yepes; Frederick Williams; Stephen J Huot
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Implementation of the mini-CEX to evaluate medical students' clinical skills.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kogan; Lisa M Bellini; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness.

Authors:  Joan Sargeant; Karen Mann; Suzanne Ferrier
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  15 in total

1.  Introduction, development, and evaluation of the miniclinical evaluation exercise in postgraduate education of chiropractors.

Authors:  Inga Paravicini; Cynthia K Peterson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2014-11-19

2.  An evaluation of a two-site pilot model for dental foundation training.

Authors:  K Ali; S Khan; P Briggs; E Jones
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Miller; Julian Archer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-09-24

4.  Performance of Preschoolers' Mothers and Senior Dental Students After Receiving Training on Fluoride Varnish Administration.

Authors:  Simin Zahra Mohebbi; Samaneh Razeghi; Zahra Chinipardaz; Hamideh Soleimannejad; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-07

5.  The mini-PAT as a multi-source feedback tool for trainees in child and adolescent psychiatry: assessing whether it is fit for purpose.

Authors:  Gill Salmon; Lesley Pugsley
Journal:  BJPsych Bull       Date:  2017-04

6.  Surgical education and adult learning: Integrating theory into practice.

Authors:  Prem Rashid
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-02-14

7.  Comparing the outcomes of different postgraduate year training programs in Taiwan.

Authors:  Peng-Wei Hsu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Ren-Huei Fu; Jing-Long Huang; Mei-Chen Liao; Shih-Tseng Lee
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  An exploratory study into the impact and acceptability of formatively used progress testing in postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology.

Authors:  Marja G K Dijksterhuis; Lambert W T Schuwirth; Didi D M Braat; Fedde Scheele
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2013-06

9.  The effect of peer-group size on the delivery of feedback in basic life support refresher training: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Youngsuk Cho; Sangmo Je; Yoo Sang Yoon; Hye Rin Roh; Chulho Chang; Hyunggoo Kang; Taeho Lim
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Exploring the influence of gender, seniority and specialty on paper and computer-based feedback provision during mini-CEX assessments in a busy emergency department.

Authors:  Yu-Che Chang; Ching-Hsing Lee; Chien-Kuang Chen; Chien-Hung Liao; Chip-Jin Ng; Jih-Chang Chen; Chung-Hsien Chaou
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.