Literature DB >> 15665172

Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.

H Davies1, N Khera, J Stroobant.   

Abstract

From April 2005 all doctors in the UK will be expected to be able to demonstrate their fitness to practice as part of the GMC revalidation procedures. The revalidation process is explicitly linked to the consultant appraisal process implemented in 2001. Central to both processes is the development of a folder (portfolio) of supporting evidence. Many consultants have no experience of developing portfolios and are unclear about how to meaningfully do so and what sort of evidence is suitable for revalidation. Furthermore, they are uncertain about whether there is any evidence to support their use for appraisal or assessment. This paper describes what a portfolio is, summarises the evidence for their use in appraisal and assessment, and provides guidance on the collection of evidence for revalidation purposes. In addition, it explores the distinction between appraisal and revalidation. Some evaluation data on perceived benefits and drawbacks by participants in appraisal in a paediatric setting is also included to inform conclusions and thoughts on planning for the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15665172      PMCID: PMC1720266          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2003.043273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  32 in total

1.  Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review.

Authors:  W Hall; C Violato; R Lewkonia; J Lockyer; H Fidler; J Toews; P Jennett; M Donoff; D Moores
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Enhancing reliability in portfolio assessment: 'shaping' the portfolio.

Authors:  John Pitts; Colin Coles; Peter Thomas
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Portfolio-based assessments in medical education: are they valid and reliable for summative purposes?

Authors:  Chris Roberts; David I Newble; Alan J O'Rourke
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Models of portfolios.

Authors:  Christine Webb; Ruth Endacott; Morag Gray; Melanie Jasper; Carolyn Miller; Mirjam McMullan; Julia Scholes
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 5.  Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.

Authors:  Jocelyn Lockyer
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Peer assessment of competence.

Authors:  John J Norcini
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Portfolios: an 'affective' assessment strategy?

Authors:  S Glen; N F Hight
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  Portfolio learning in general practice vocational training--does it work?

Authors:  D Snadden; M L Thomas
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Methodologic trends in the healthcare professions: portfolio assessment.

Authors:  J E Forker; M E McDonald
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.082

10.  Portfolios in continuing medical education--effective and efficient?

Authors:  N J Mathers; M C Challis; A C Howe; N J Field
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  1 in total

1.  Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.

Authors:  Daniel S Furmedge; Ann Griffin; Catherine O'Keeffe; Anju Verma; Laura-Jane Smith; Deborah Gill
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.463

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.