Literature DB >> 3071213

Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation.

J Borah1, L R Young, R E Curry.   

Abstract

A model is presented to predict human dynamic spatial orientation in response to multisensory stimuli. Motion stimuli are first processed by dynamic models of the visual, vestibular, tactile, and proprioceptive sensors. Central nervous system function is modeled as a steady state Kalman filter that optimally blends information from the various sensors to form an estimate of spatial orientation. Where necessary, nonlinear elements preprocess inputs to the linear central estimator in order to reflect more accurately some nonlinear human response characteristics. Computer implementation of the model has shown agreement with several important qualitative characteristics of human spatial orientation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3071213     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb19555.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  35 in total

1.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A distributed, dynamic, parallel computational model: the role of noise in velocity storage.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Optokinetic circular vection: a test of visual-vestibular conflict models of vection nascensy.

Authors:  R Jürgens; K Kliegl; J Kassubek; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Constructive perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Gin McCollum
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 6.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Narayan Ganesan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Gravity dependence of the effect of optokinetic stimulation on the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Christopher J Bockisch; Nicoletta Caramia; Giovanni Bertolini; Alexander Andrea Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Age-related reweighting of visual and vestibular cues for vertical perception.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cerebellar Prediction of the Dynamic Sensory Consequences of Gravity.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.