Literature DB >> 11495965

Learning to move amid uncertainty.

R A Scheidt1, J B Dingwell, F A Mussa-Ivaldi.   

Abstract

We studied how subjects learned to make movements against unpredictable perturbations. Twelve healthy human subjects made goal-directed reaching movements in the horizontal plane while holding the handle of a two-joint robotic manipulator. The robot generated viscous force fields that perturbed the limb perpendicular to the desired direction of movement. The amplitude (but not the direction) of the viscous field varied randomly from trial to trial. Systems identification techniques were employed to characterize how subjects adapted to these random perturbations. Subject performance was quantified primarily using the peak deviation from a straight-line hand path. Subjects adapted their arm movements to the sequence of random force-field amplitudes. This adaptive response compensated for the approximate mean from the random sequence of perturbations and did not depend on the statistical distribution of that sequence. Subjects did not adapt by directly counteracting the mean field strength itself on each trial but rather by using information about perturbations and movement errors from a limited number of previous trials to adjust motor commands on subsequent trials. This strategy permitted subjects to achieve near-optimal performance (defined as minimizing movement errors in a least-squares sense) while maintaining computational efficiency. A simple model using information about movement errors and perturbation amplitudes from a single previous trial predicted subject performance in stochastic environments with a high degree of fidelity and further predicted key performance features observed in nonstochastic environments. This suggests that the neural structures modified during motor adaptation require only short-term memory. Explicit representations regarding movements made more than a few trials in the past are not used in generating optimal motor responses on any given trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495965     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  151 in total

1.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Environmental experience within and across testing days determines the strength of human visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Amy L Daitch; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of interaction force levels on degree of motor adaptation in a stable dynamic force field.

Authors:  E J Lai; A J Hodgson; T E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The loss function of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad Paul Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Suppression of proprioceptive feedback control in movement sequences through intermediate targets.

Authors:  C Minos Niu; Daniel M Corcos; Mark B Shapiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptation to sensory-motor reflex perturbations is blind to the source of errors.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A theory for how sensorimotor skills are learned and retained in noisy and nonstationary neural circuits.

Authors:  Robert Ajemian; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Helene Moorman; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Günther Knoblich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Authors:  Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.