Literature DB >> 22143868

Environmental experience within and across testing days determines the strength of human visuomotor adaptation.

Jennifer A Semrau1, Amy L Daitch, Kurt A Thoroughman.   

Abstract

The use of vision allows us to guide and modify our movements by appropriately transforming external sensory information into proper motor commands. We investigated how people learned visuomotor transformations in different visual feedback environments. These environments presented perturbations of visual sense of movement direction. Across experiments and testing days, we altered the likelihood of visual perturbation occurrence and the distribution of sign and strength of visual perturbation angles. We then observed how transformation of sensed error into incremental adaptation depended on visual perturbation angle and on environmental experience. We found that environmental context affected adaptive responses within a day and across days. The across-day effect was profound enough that people exhibited very weak or very strong adaptive sensitivity to identical stimuli, dependent solely on prior days' experience. We conclude that trial-by-trial adaptation to visual feedback is not fixed, but dependent on environmental experiences on both short and long time scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143868     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2945-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  A Bayesian formulation of behavioral control.

Authors:  Quentin J M Huys; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-03-12

Review 5.  An integrative approach to the biomechanical function and neuromuscular control of the fingers.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements.

Authors:  Z M Pine; J W Krakauer; J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Rapid reshaping of human motor generalization.

Authors:  Kurt A Thoroughman; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The roles of vision and proprioception in the planning of reaching movements.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  8 in total

1.  Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Krista M Bond; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Formation of a long-term memory for visuomotor adaptation following only a few trials of practice.

Authors:  David M Huberdeau; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Relative sensitivity of explicit reaiming and implicit motor adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah A Hutter; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  David J Herzfeld; Pavan A Vaswani; Mollie K Marko; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Neural correlates of adaptation to gradual and to sudden visuomotor distortions in humans.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Christoph F Schorn; Otmar Bock; Nina Theysohn; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visuomotor adaptation in Parkinson's disease: effects of perturbation type and medication state.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Joel S Perlmutter; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Dynamic neural correlates of motor error monitoring and adaptation during trial-to-trial learning.

Authors:  Huiling Tan; Ned Jenkinson; Peter Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Long-Term Motor Learning in the "Wild" With High Volume Video Game Data.

Authors:  Jennifer B Listman; Jonathan S Tsay; Hyosub E Kim; Wayne E Mackey; David J Heeger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.