Literature DB >> 19784639

Is simple reaction time affected by visual illusions?

Irene Sperandio1, Silvia Savazzi, Carlo A Marzi.   

Abstract

A number of studies have shown that while perceptual judgment is deceived by pictorial illusions, grasping and other kinds of motor behaviour are not. This is in keeping with the existence of two different cortical systems: a ventral stream subserving vision-for-perception and a dorsal stream subserving vision-for-action. The former is sensitive to illusions, the latter is not. Given this dissociation of functions, one wonders whether simple visuomotor reaction time (RT) follows the ventral or the dorsal rule in perceiving illusory figures. Answering this question might contribute to a better understanding of the different functions of the two systems. We carried out two experiments, one with the Ponzo and the other with the Ebbinghaus-Titchener illusion and found that RT is sensitive to both illusions with faster responses to stimuli appearing illusorily bigger than the others. These results show that motor action is subserved by the ventral system when that action directly reports the presence or onset of a target rather than when that action requires a spatial adjustment that reflects the physical features of the target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19784639     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2023-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?

Authors:  F Pavani; I Boscagli; F Benvenuti; M Rabuffetti; A Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How sensitive is hand transport to illusory context effects?

Authors:  M H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time.

Authors:  Richard T Dyde; A David Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?. Two- and three-dimensional targets.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kwok; Oliver J Braddick
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The Medawar Lecture 2001 knowledge for vision: vision for knowledge.

Authors:  Richard L Gregory
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Retinal eccentricity effects on reaction time to imagined stimuli.

Authors:  C A Marzi; F Mancini; T Metitieri; S Savazzi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Reaction time as a function of peripheral retinal locus around fovea: effect of stimulus size.

Authors:  N Osaka
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1976-10

9.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The visuomotor system resists the horizontal-vertical illusion.

Authors:  P Servos; H Carnahan; J Fedwick
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reaction times and perceptual adjustments are sensitive to the illusory distortion of space.

Authors:  Silvia Savazzi; Barbara Emanuele; Paige Scalf; Diane Beck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Illusory double flashes can speed up responses like physical ones: evidence from the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Anja Fiedler; Julie L O'Sullivan; Hannes Schröter; Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of stimulus duration on visual illusions and simple reaction time.

Authors:  Thorsten Plewan; Ralph Weidner; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Simple reaction time and size-distance integration in virtual 3D space.

Authors:  Thorsten Plewan; Gerhard Rinkenauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-03-30

5.  Enhanced visual dominance in far space.

Authors:  Zhenzhu Yue; Yizhou Jiang; You Li; Pengfei Wang; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Global processing during the Müller-Lyer illusion is distinctively affected by the degree of autistic traits in the typical population.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; William A Noulty; Irene Sperandio; Oriane Landry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Information processing correlates of a size-contrast illusion.

Authors:  Jason M Gold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-19

Review 8.  Visual Illusions: An Interesting Tool to Investigate Developmental Dyslexia and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Simone Gori; Massimo Molteni; Andrea Facoetti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target-context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion.

Authors:  Hester Knol; Raoul Huys; Jean-Christophe Sarrazin; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-04

10.  Visual evoked potentials to change in coloration of a moving bar.

Authors:  Carolina Murd; Kairi Kreegipuu; Nele Kuldkepp; Aire Raidvee; Maria Tamm; Jüri Allik
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.