Literature DB >> 15782350

Effects of the Ebbinghaus figure on grasping are not only due to misjudged size.

Denise D J de Grave1, Marianne Biegstraaten, Jeroen B J Smeets, Eli Brenner.   

Abstract

It is not evident how the small effects of the flankers of the Ebbinghaus figure on peak grip aperture (PGA) should be interpreted. One interpretation is that the flankers influence the estimated size, which in turn influences the grasp. If this interpretation is correct, then only the size-dependent aspects of the grasping movement should depend on the spatial positions of the flankers. An alternative interpretation is that the effect on grip aperture is caused by a change in judgement of the required precision, in which case various aspects of the grasping movement could be influenced by the size and position of the flankers. We presented subjects with a display consisting of a central disk surrounded by four large or small flankers. The array of circular flankers could be rotated by 45 degrees . There were two tasks: to reproduce the perceived size of the central disk, and to grasp the central disk. As in other studies, the reproduced size and the PGA were both influenced by the size of the flankers. The effect on reproduced size settings was independent of the flankers' spatial position. Nevertheless, the flankers' position did influence the final grip aperture and the grip orientation at PGA and at movement offset. Because the flankers changed more than only the PGA, we conclude that the effect of the flankers on prehension cannot only be because of misjudgement of the size of the central disk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15782350     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2138-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?

Authors:  F Pavani; I Boscagli; F Benvenuti; M Rabuffetti; A Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

4.  The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children.

Authors:  C Hanisch; J Konczak; C Dohle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?. Two- and three-dimensional targets.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kwok; Oliver J Braddick
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Similar effects of a motion-in-depth illusion on manual tracking and perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Modeling the time-dependent effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Scott Glover; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

10.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  14 in total

1.  Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Why are saccades influenced by the Brentano illusion?

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.

Authors:  R Gilster; J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; C D Wiesner; R Ferstl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The specificity of learned associations in visuomotor and perceptual processing.

Authors:  L Desanghere; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The Brentano illusion influences goal-directed movements of the left and right hand to the same extent.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Division of labour within the visual system: fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Kathrin Soder; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Misperceiving the speed-accuracy tradeoff: imagined movements and perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Scott J Young; Jay Pratt; Tom Chau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Devi Stuart-Fox; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The effect of force feedback delay on stiffness perception and grip force modulation during tool-mediated interaction with elastic force fields.

Authors:  Raz Leib; Amir Karniel; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.