Literature DB >> 22038721

Getting a grip on illusions: replicating Stöttinger et al [Exp Brain Res (2010) 202:79-88] results with 3-D objects.

Elisabeth Stöttinger1, Jürgen Pfusterschmied, Herbert Wagner, James Danckert, Britt Anderson, Josef Perner.   

Abstract

Studies using visual illusions to demonstrate a dissociation within the visual system can provide relevant and decisive data only if certain methodological points are taken into account. Although, our previous work (Stöttinger et al. in Exp Brain Res 202:88-97, 2010) followed these points, the task made use of only 2-D stimuli which may raise doubts concerning the nature of grasping in that experiment. We therefore replicated the study using a 3-D version of the empty space illusion. Consistent with the earlier study, that used 2-D stimuli, we found that grip aperture followed actual target size independent of illusory effects, while perceived length, as indicated by finger-thumb span, clearly was subject to the illusion. Therefore, the prior results cannot be due to the use of 2-D stimuli. Together, these two studies provide clear evidence for the perception versus action hypothesis.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22038721     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2912-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?

Authors:  F Pavani; I Boscagli; F Benvenuti; M Rabuffetti; A Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action.

Authors:  V H Franz; K R Gegenfurtner; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-01

4.  When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?. Two- and three-dimensional targets.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kwok; Oliver J Braddick
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

Review 6.  Action without perception in human vision.

Authors:  Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Division of labour within the visual system: fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Kathrin Soder; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.

Authors:  D A Westwood; T McEachern; E A Roy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia.

Authors:  David A Westwood; James Danckert; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation.

Authors:  Volker H Franz; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception.

Authors:  Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Statistical extraction affects visually guided action.

Authors:  Jennifer E Corbett; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-07-01

3.  Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Tzvi Ganel; Caitlin M Byrne; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Ebbinghaus figures that deceive the eye do not necessarily deceive the hand.

Authors:  Hester Knol; Raoul Huys; Jean-Christophe Sarrazin; Andreas Spiegler; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Grasping of Real-World Objects Is Not Biased by Ensemble Perception.

Authors:  Annabel Wing-Yan Fan; Lin Lawrence Guo; Adam Frost; Robert L Whitwell; Matthias Niemeier; Jonathan S Cant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-12

6.  Vision for Perception and Vision for Action in Space Travelers.

Authors:  Valeriia Yu Karpinskaia; Ekaterina V Pechenkova; Inna S Zelenskaya; Vsevolod A Lyakhovetskii
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Relative, not absolute, stimulus size is responsible for a correspondence effect between physical stimulus size and left/right responses.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Melanie Richter
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target-context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion.

Authors:  Hester Knol; Raoul Huys; Jean-Christophe Sarrazin; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-04

9.  Adaptation to size affects saccades with long but not short latencies.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Why some size illusions affect grip aperture.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Erik Kleijn; Marlijn van der Meijden; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.