Literature DB >> 12664101

High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best?

Thomas M Link1, Volker Vieth, Christoph Stehling, Albrecht Lotter, Ambros Beer, David Newitt, Sharmila Majumdar.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare trabecular bone structure parameters obtained from high-resolution magnetic resonance (HRMR) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) images with those determined in contact radiographs from corresponding specimen sections. High-resolution MR and MSCT images were obtained in 39 distal radius specimens. For HRMR the in-plane spatial resolution was 0.152x0.153 mm(2) with a slice thickness of 0.9 and 0.3 mm using a 3D T1-weighted spin-echo sequence. For MSCT the resolution was 0.247x0.247 mm(2) with a collimation of 1 mm. Using a diamond saw, 117 0.9- to 1-mm-thick sections were obtained from these specimens and contact radiographs were acquired. In the corresponding sections structure parameters analogous to bone histomorphometry were determined. Significant correlations between MR- and CT-derived structure parameters and those derived from the contact radiographs were found (p<0.01); r values of up to 0.75 were obtained for HRMR imaging and up to 0.70 for MSCT. On the average, structure parameters showed higher correlations for the MR- than for the CT-derived data. For the MR data the threshold algorithm used for binarizing the images substantially affected these correlations. In conclusion, trabecular bone structure parameters assessed in distal radius HRMR and MSCT images are significantly correlated with those determined in corresponding specimen sections (p<0.01). High-resolution MR-derived structure parameters, however, performed better in the prediction of trabecular bone structure.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12664101     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1695-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

Review 1.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone structure of the calcaneus: analysis with magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutry; Bernard Cortet; Daniel Chappard; Patrick Dubois; Xavier Demondion; Xavier Marchandise; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Bone fractal analysis.

Authors:  Gian Pietro Feltrin; Roberto Stramare; Diego Miotto; Dario Giacomini; Claudio Saccavini
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Reproducibility and sources of variability in radiographic texture analysis of densitometric calcaneal images.

Authors:  Tamara J Vokes; Ann Pham; Joel Wilkie; Masha Kocherginsky; Siu-Ling Ma; Michael Chinander; Theodore Karrison; Octavia Bris; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Reproducibility of trabecular structure analysis using flat-panel volume computed tomography.

Authors:  Arnold C Cheung; Miriam A Bredella; Ma'moun Al Khalaf; Michael Grasruck; Christianne Leidecker; Rajiv Gupta
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Musculoskeletal applications of flat-panel volume CT.

Authors:  Benjamin Reichardt; Ammar Sarwar; Soenke H Bartling; Arnold Cheung; Michael Grasruck; Christianne Leidecker; Miriam A Bredella; Thomas J Brady; Rajiv Gupta
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  [Design and optimization of a cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging].

Authors:  Kun Ma; Mingqiang Li; Xi Tao; Dong Zeng; Yongbo Wang; Zhaoying Bian; Ziquan Wei; Gaofeng Chen; Qianjin Feng; Jianhua Ma; Jing Huang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 8.  Osteoporosis imaging: state of the art and advanced imaging.

Authors:  Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

10.  Characterization of trabecular bone plate-rod microarchitecture using multirow detector CT and the tensor scale: Algorithms, validation, and applications to pilot human studies.

Authors:  Punam K Saha; Yinxiao Liu; Cheng Chen; Dakai Jin; Elena M Letuchy; Ziyue Xu; Ryan E Amelon; Trudy L Burns; James C Torner; Steven M Levy; Chadi A Calarge
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.