Literature DB >> 18158263

Reproducibility and sources of variability in radiographic texture analysis of densitometric calcaneal images.

Tamara J Vokes1, Ann Pham, Joel Wilkie, Masha Kocherginsky, Siu-Ling Ma, Michael Chinander, Theodore Karrison, Octavia Bris, Maryellen L Giger.   

Abstract

Radiographic texture analysis (RTA) is a computerized analysis of the spatial pattern of radiographic images used as a way of evaluating bone structure. We have shown that RTA performed on high-resolution heel images obtained using a portable densitometer differentiates subjects with and without osteoporotic fractures. In the present study, short-term precision of RTA was examined on densitometric heel images obtained from 33 subjects scanned 8 times each, with 3 observers placing a region of interest (ROI) 3 times on each image. The long-term precision was examined on images obtained from 10 subjects 3 times on each of 3 days separated by 1 week, with 2 observers placing an ROI on each image. The RTA features examined included the root mean square (RMS) variation, a measure of the contrast between the light and dark areas of the image, the first moment of the power spectrum, a measure of the spatial frequency of the trabecular pattern, and Minkowski fractal (MINK), a measure of roughness/smoothness of the trabecular pattern. The precision of the RTA features expressed as coefficient of variation ranged between the lowest of 0.5-0.7% for MINK and the highest of 14-16% for RMS. The short- and long-term precision was similar, and was not significantly influenced by repositioning and rescanning, or by ROI placement by the same or different observers. Significant sources of variability of RTA were the between-subject differences and differences between regions of the heel, but not differences due to repositioning, rescanning in the same position, or ROI placement by the same or different observers. We conclude that technical aspects of image acquisition and processing are adequate to allow further development of RTA of the densitometric images for clinical application as a method for noninvasive assessment of bone structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18158263      PMCID: PMC2587361          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  40 in total

1.  Long-term reproducibility optimization of an x-ray process for bone architectural evaluation during osteoporosis.

Authors:  F Fidouh; R Harba; G Jacquet; T Loussot; E Lespessailles
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Texture analysis of X-ray radiographs is correlated with bone histomorphometry.

Authors:  Daniel Chappard; Pascal Guggenbuhl; Erick Legrand; Michel Félix Baslé; Maurice Audran
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  S Majumdar; M Kothari; P Augat; D C Newitt; T M Link; J C Lin; T Lang; Y Lu; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Anisotropy changes in post-menopausal osteoporosis: characterization by a new index applied to trabecular bone radiographic images.

Authors:  Christine Chappard; Barbara Brunet-Imbault; Gérald Lemineur; Bruno Giraudeau; Armelle Basillais; Rachid Harba; Claude-Laurent Benhamou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Detection of osteoporosis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the calcaneus: is the WHO criterion applicable?

Authors:  E M B Pacheco; E J Harrison; K A Ward; M Lunt; J E Adams
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Reproducibility and error sources of micro-MRI-based trabecular bone structural parameters of the distal radius and tibia.

Authors:  B R Gomberg; F W Wehrli; B Vasilić; R H Weening; P K Saha; H K Song; A C Wright
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Investigation of physical image quality indices of a bone densitometry system.

Authors:  Joel R Wilkie; Maryellen L Giger; Michael R Chinander; Tamara J Vokes; Robert M Nishikawa; Michael D Carlin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Computerized radiographic analysis of osteoporosis: preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  P Caligiuri; M L Giger; M J Favus; H Jia; K Doi; L B Dixon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Standard radiography: untapped potential in the assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk.

Authors:  Pasi Pulkkinen; Simo Saarakkala; Miika T Nieminen; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiographic texture analysis of densitometric calcaneal images: relationship to clinical characteristics and to bone fragility.

Authors:  Tamara Vokes; Diane Lauderdale; Siu-Ling Ma; Mike Chinander; Keona Childs; Maryellen Giger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Radiomics and radiogenomics in ovarian cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  S Nougaret; Cathal McCague; Hichem Tibermacine; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Stefania Rizzo; E Sala
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.