Literature DB >> 14504716

Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Mary L Bouxsein.   

Abstract

As was true 10 years ago, tremendous interest surrounds the concept of "bone quality," as shown by the intense and growing research activity in the field. The urgency to advance knowledge in this area is motivated by the need to understand not only the causes of increased skeletal fragility with aging and disease, but also the mechanisms by which drugs reduce fracture risk. As reflected in the preceding articles, in the past decade collaborations between biologists, physicists, engineers and clinicians have led to new insights regarding the biological, material and structural features that contribute to skeletal fragility. Despite these new insights, important issues remain unresolved. Our challenges lie in identifying, describing and understanding the totality of features and characteristics that determine a bone's ability to resist fracture, and using this information to identify new therapeutic targets and develop better biomarkers and noninvasive imaging modalities. This summary is intended to integrate reports in the literature with presentations and discussions that occurred during the meeting, to highlight areas of consensus and those of continued controversy, and thus to identify critical areas for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14504716     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1489-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  81 in total

1.  Mechanical consequences of bone loss in cancellous bone.

Authors:  J C van der Linden; J Homminga; J A Verhaar; H Weinans
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Cross-sectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D A Nelson; D A Barondess; S L Hendrix; T J Beck
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Effects of current and discontinued estrogen replacement therapy on hip structural geometry: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  T J Beck; K L Stone; T L Oreskovic; M C Hochberg; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Relative roles of microdamage and microfracture in the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone.

Authors:  O C Yeh; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Suppressed bone turnover by bisphosphonates increases microdamage accumulation and reduces some biomechanical properties in dog rib.

Authors:  T Mashiba; T Hirano; C H Turner; M R Forwood; C C Johnston; D B Burr
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Effects of vertebral bone fragility and bone formation rate on the mineralization levels of cancellous bone from white females.

Authors:  T E Ciarelli; D P Fyhrie; A M Parfitt
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Alendronate increases bone strength by increasing the mean degree of mineralization of bone tissue in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  G Y Boivin; P M Chavassieux; A C Santora; J Yates; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Volker Vieth; Julia Matheis; David Newitt; Ying Lu; Ernst J Rummeny; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Long-term treatment of incadronate disodium accumulates microdamage but improves the trabecular bone microarchitecture in dog vertebra.

Authors:  Satoshi Komatsubara; Satoshi Mori; Tasuku Mashiba; Masako Ito; Jiliang Li; Yoshio Kaji; Tomoyuki Akiyama; Kensaku Miyamoto; Yongping Cao; Jun Kawanishi; Hiromichi Norimatsu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate.

Authors:  R Eastell; I Barton; R A Hannon; A Chines; P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  71 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing bone quality: a review.

Authors:  Eve Donnelly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Microcracks in compact bone: a three-dimensional view.

Authors:  S Mohsin; F J O'Brien; T C Lee
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  A biomechanical perspective on bone quality.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Microwave tomographic imaging for osteoporosis screening: a pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Tian Zhou; Paul M Meaney; Matthew J Pallone; Shireen Geimer; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

5.  Trabecular bone structure analysis in the osteoporotic spine using a clinical in vivo setup for 64-slice MDCT imaging: comparison to microCT imaging and microFE modeling.

Authors:  Ahi S Issever; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Patrik Rogalla; Karsten Schwieger; Markus B Huber; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar; Gerd Diederichs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Mutant cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) compromises bone integrity, joint function and the balance between adipogenesis and osteogenesis.

Authors:  Francoise Coustry; Karen L Posey; Tristan Maerz; Kevin Baker; Annie M Abraham; Catherine G Ambrose; Sabah Nobakhti; Sandra J Shefelbine; Xiaohong Bi; Michael Newton; Karissa Gawronski; Lindsay Remer; Alka C Veerisetty; Mohammad G Hossain; Frankie Chiu; Jacqueline T Hecht
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 7.  Hierarchical microimaging of bone structure and function.

Authors:  Ralph Müller
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 8.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Density and architecture have greater effects on the toughness of trabecular bone than damage.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Garrison; Constance L Slaboch; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Bone density and young athletic women. An update.

Authors:  David L Nichols; Charlotte F Sanborn; Eve V Essery
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.