Literature DB >> 22438439

Osteoporosis imaging: state of the art and advanced imaging.

Thomas M Link1.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is becoming an increasingly important public health issue, and effective treatments to prevent fragility fractures are available. Osteoporosis imaging is of critical importance in identifying individuals at risk for fractures who would require pharmacotherapy to reduce fracture risk and also in monitoring response to treatment. Dual x-ray absorptiometry is currently the state-of-the-art technique to measure bone mineral density and to diagnose osteoporosis according to the World Health Organization guidelines. Motivated by a 2000 National Institutes of Health consensus conference, substantial research efforts have focused on assessing bone quality by using advanced imaging techniques. Among these techniques aimed at better characterizing fracture risk and treatment effects, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (CT) currently plays a central role, and a large number of recent studies have used this technique to study trabecular and cortical bone architecture. Other techniques to analyze bone quality include multidetector CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and quantitative ultrasonography. In addition to quantitative imaging techniques measuring bone density and quality, imaging needs to be used to diagnose prevalent osteoporotic fractures, such as spine fractures on chest radiographs and sagittal multidetector CT reconstructions. Radiologists need to be sensitized to the fact that the presence of fragility fractures will alter patient care, and these fractures need to be described in the report. This review article covers state-of-the-art imaging techniques to measure bone mineral density, describes novel techniques to study bone quality, and focuses on how standard imaging techniques should be used to diagnose prevalent osteoporotic fractures. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438439      PMCID: PMC3309802          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2631201201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  114 in total

1.  Bone densitometry: an update.

Authors:  Ignac Fogelman; Glen M Blake
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Roland Krug; S Banerjee; E T Han; D C Newitt; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Philip Sambrook; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Three-dimensional radial ultrashort echo-time imaging with T2 adapted sampling.

Authors:  Jürgen Rahmer; Peter Börnert; Jan Groen; Clemens Bos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Vertebral fracture assessment: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  Tamara Vokes; Donald Bachman; Sanford Baim; Neil Binkley; Susan Broy; Lynne Ferrar; E Michael Lewiecki; Bradford Richmond; John Schousboe
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  Mechanisms of disease: is osteoporosis the obesity of bone?

Authors:  Clifford J Rosen; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol       Date:  2006-01

7.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Stephanie Boutroy; Mary L Bouxsein; Francoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: comparison of MR imaging at 3.0 and 1.5 T with micro-CT as the standard of reference.

Authors:  Catherine M Phan; Maiko Matsuura; Jan S Bauer; Timothy C Dunn; David Newitt; Eva M Lochmueller; Felix Eckstein; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Digital x-ray radiogrammetry identifies women at risk of osteoporotic fracture: results from a prospective study.

Authors:  P Bach-Mortensen; L Hyldstrup; M Appleyard; K Hindsø; P Gebuhr; S Sonne-Holm
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.

Authors:  V Bousson; A Le Bras; F Roqueplan; Y Kang; D Mitton; S Kolta; C Bergot; W Skalli; E Vicaut; W Kalender; K Engelke; J-D Laredo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  121 in total

1.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Alessandro Poloni; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Carmelo Messina; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Marcello Petrini; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Segmentation of joint and musculoskeletal tissue in the study of arthritis.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System Using Ultrahigh Field (7T) MR Imaging.

Authors:  Hamza Alizai; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-10

5.  Fatigue-induced microdamage in cancellous bone occurs distant from resorption cavities and trabecular surfaces.

Authors:  M G Goff; F M Lambers; T M Nguyen; J Sung; C M Rimnac; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Quantitative dual-energy CT for phantomless evaluation of cancellous bone mineral density of the vertebral pedicle: correlation with pedicle screw pull-out strength.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Christian Booz; Stefan Wesarg; Ralf W Bauer; J Matthias Kerl; Sebastian Fischer; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; M Fawad Khan; Konstantinos Kafchitsas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Assessment of image quality in soft tissue and bone visualization tasks for a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT system.

Authors:  S Demehri; A Muhit; W Zbijewski; J W Stayman; J Yorkston; N Packard; R Senn; D Yang; D Foos; G K Thawait; L M Fayad; A Chhabra; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Bone Strength Estimated by Micro-Finite Element Analysis (µFEA) Is Heritable and Shares Genetic Predisposition With Areal BMD: The Framingham Study.

Authors:  David Karasik; Serkalem Demissie; Darlene Lu; Kerry E Broe; Steven K Boyd; Ching-Ti Liu; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Mary L Bouxsein; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Bone mineral density among long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study.

Authors:  J G Gurney; S C Kaste; W Liu; D K Srivastava; W Chemaitilly; K K Ness; J Q Lanctot; R P Ojha; K A Nottage; C L Wilson; Z Li; L L Robison; M M Hudson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 10.  Osteoporosis: what the clinician needs to know?

Authors:  Rosario Francesco Balzano; Maria Mattera; Xiaoguang Cheng; Samantha Cornacchia; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.