Literature DB >> 15754981

Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems.

Roger J Zemp1, Mark D Parry, Craig K Abbey, Michael F Insana.   

Abstract

A rigorous statistical theory for characterizing the performance of medical ultrasound systems for lesion detection tasks is developed. A design strategy for optimizing ultrasound systems should be to adjust parameters for maximum information content, which is obtained by maximizing the ideal observer performance. Then, given the radio-frequency data, image and signal processing algorithms are designed to extract as much diagnostically relevant information as possible. In this paper, closed-form and low-contrast approximations of ideal observer performance are derived for signal known statistically detection tasks. The accuracy of the approximations are tested by comparing with Monte Carlo techniques. A metric borrowed and modified from photon imaging, Generalized Noise Equivalent Quanta, is shown to be a useful and measurable target-independent figure of merit when adapted for ultrasound systems. This theory provides the potential to optimize design tradeoffs for detection tasks. For example it may help us understand how to push the limits of specific features, such as spatial resolution, without significantly compromising overall detection performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15754981      PMCID: PMC2715177          DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2004.841226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  20 in total

1.  Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques.

Authors:  Matthew A Kupinski; John W Hoppin; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Synthetic elevation beamforming and image acquisition capabilities using an 8 x 128 1.75D array.

Authors:  Anna T Fernandez; Kim L Gammelmark; Jeremy J Dahl; Constance G Keen; Roderick C Gauss; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Modeling of nonlinear ultrasound propagation in tissue from array transducers.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Jahangir Tavakkoli; Richard S C Cobbold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Coded excitation for diagnostic ultrasound: a system developer's perspective.

Authors:  Richard Y Chiao; Xiaohui Hao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Approximations to ideal-observer performance on signal-detection tasks.

Authors:  E Clarkson; H H Barrett
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 1.980

7.  Pulse elongation and deconvolution filtering for medical ultrasonic imaging.

Authors:  B Haider; P A Lewin; K E Thomenius
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Coded excitation system for improving the penetration of real-time phased-array imaging systems.

Authors:  M O'Donnell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Low Contrast Sensitivity of Radiologic, CT, Nuclear Medicine, and Ultrasound Medical Imaging Systems.

Authors:  R F Wagner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  9 in total

1.  Efficient array beam forming by spatial filtering for ultrasound B-mode imaging.

Authors:  Kang-Sik Kim; Jie Liu; Michael F Insana
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Imaging with unfocused regions of focused ultrasound beams.

Authors:  Roger Zemp; Michael F Insana
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  SNR comparisons of beamforming strategies.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Kang-Sik Kim; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks simulating malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Roger J Zemp; Jie Liu; Karen K Lindfors; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Ultrasonic multipath and beamforming clutter reduction: a chirp model approach.

Authors:  Brett Byram; Marko Jakovljevic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Linear System Models for Ultrasonic Imaging: Intensity Signal Statistics.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Yang Zhu; Sara Bahramian; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Generalized cystic resolution: a metric for assessing the fundamental limits on beamformer performance.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Histogram Matching for Visual Ultrasound Image Comparison.

Authors:  Nick Bottenus; Brett C Byram; Dongwoon Hyun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Ultrasound Lesion Detectability as a Distance Between Probability Measures.

Authors:  Dongwoon Hyun; Gene B Kim; Nick Bottenus; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.725

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.