Literature DB >> 7730951

Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance.

H H Barrett1, J L Denny, R F Wagner, K J Myers.   

Abstract

Figures of merit for image quality are derived on the basis of the performance of mathematical observers on specific detection and estimation tasks. The tasks include detection of a known signal superimposed on a known background, detection of a known signal on a random background, estimation of Fourier coefficients of the object, and estimation of the integral of the object over a specified region of interest. The chosen observer for the detection tasks is the ideal linear discriminant, which we call the Hotelling observer. The figures of merit are based on the Fisher information matrix relevant to estimation of the Fourier coefficients and the closely related Fourier crosstalk matrix introduced earlier by Barrett and Gifford [Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 451 (1994)]. A finite submatrix of the infinite Fisher information matrix is used to set Cramer-Rao lower bounds on the variances of the estimates of the first N Fourier coefficients. The figures of merit for detection tasks are shown to be closely related to the concepts of noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ) and generalized NEQ, originally derived for linear, shift-invariant imaging systems and stationary noise. Application of these results to the design of imaging systems is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7730951     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.12.000834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  51 in total

1.  Maximum-likelihood approach to strain imaging using ultrasound

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Objective comparison of quantitative imaging modalities without the use of a gold standard.

Authors:  John W Hoppin; Matthew A Kupinski; George A Kastis; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Experimental determination of object statistics from noisy images.

Authors:  Matthew A Kupinski; Eric Clarkson; John W Hoppin; Liying Chen; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  Scatter modelling and compensation in emission tomography.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Kenneth F Koral
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Noise characteristics of heterodyne/homodyne frequency-domain measurements.

Authors:  Dongyel Kang; Matthew A Kupinski
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Analysis of a photoacoustic imaging system by the crosstalk matrix and singular value decomposition.

Authors:  Michael Roumeliotis; Robert Z Stodilka; Mark A Anastasio; Govind Chaudhary; Hazem Al-Aabed; Eldon Ng; Andrea Immucci; Jeffrey J L Carson
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Statistical Characterization of Radiological Images: Basic Principles and Recent Progress.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2007-01-01

9.  Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Mark D Parry; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Maximum-likelihood methods in wavefront sensing: stochastic models and likelihood functions.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Christopher Dainty; David Lara
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.