Literature DB >> 15760861

Carotid stent delivery in an XMR suite: immediate assessment of the physiologic impact of extracranial revascularization.

Alastair J Martin1, David A Saloner, Timothy P L Roberts, Heidi Roberts, Oliver M Weber, William Dillon, Sean Cullen, Van Halbach, Christopher F Dowd, Randall T Higashida.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Patients undergoing stent placement as treatment for severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) were assessed with MR imaging in a combined MR-radiographic (XMR) angiography suite. MR imaging was performed before and immediately following conventional radiography-guided stent placement. Changes in MR imaging measurable properties, including flow and perfusion, resulting from stent placement were evaluated. PATIENTS AND TECHNIQUES: MR imaging analysis was performed for 12 patients with >70% stenosis of the ICA before and after conventional radiography-guided deployment of a carotid stent. MR imaging acquisitions included angiography, quantitative flow analysis, perfusion, diffusion, and turbo-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). These acquisitions were all performed immediately before and following stent placement by using conventional techniques.
RESULTS: MR angiography proved sufficient for identifying the target lesion and permitting targeted flow analysis. MR flow analysis demonstrated a marked increase in flow in the treated carotid artery (+2.2 +/- 1.2 mL/s) and little change in other extracranial arteries. MR perfusion imaging showed no significant differences in relative cerebral blood volume between hemispheres before or after treatment, but there was a modest decrease in mean transit time and time to peak evident in the treated hemisphere after stent placement. Diffusion imaging did not demonstrate any ischemic foci resulting from carotid stent treatment. Hyperintensity of the CSF was noted on turbo-FLAIR acquisitions in the ipsilateral hemisphere following stent placement in 75% of patients.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging reliably reflects the state of the carotid artery and provides a means of monitoring and quantifying the effects of revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15760861      PMCID: PMC7976503     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  16 in total

1.  MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: A systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths.

Authors:  T Klemm; S Duda; J Machann; K Seekamp-Rahn; L Schnieder; C D Claussen; F Schick
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Improved in-stent magnetic resonance angiography with high flip angle excitation.

Authors:  J M Meyer; A Buecker; E Spuentrup; K Schuermann; M Huetten; R D Hilgers; J J van Vaals; R W Guenther
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Short-term changes in cerebral microhemodynamics after carotid stenting.

Authors:  Iain D Wilkinson; Paul D Griffiths; Nigel Hoggard; Trevor J Cleveland; Peter A Gaines; Sumaira Macdonald; Fiona McKevitt; Graham S Venables
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement.

Authors:  M H Wholey; M Wholey; K Mathias; G S Roubin; E B Diethrich; M Henry; S Bailey; P Bergeron; G Dorros; G Eles; P Gaines; C R Gomez; B Gray; J Guimaraens; R Higashida; D S Ho; B Katzen; A Kambara; V Kumar; J C Laborde; M Leon; M Lim; H Londero; J Mesa; A Musacchio; S Myla; S Ramee; A Rodriquez; K Rosenfield; N Sakai; F Shawl; H Sievert; G Teitelbaum; J G Theron; P Vaclav; C Vozzi; J S Yadav; S I Yoshimura
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent.

Authors:  Arno Buecker; Elmar Spuentrup; Alexander Ruebben; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Carotid artery stent placement for atherosclerotic disease: rationale, technique, and current status.

Authors:  C C Phatouros; R T Higashida; A M Malek; P M Meyers; T E Lempert; C F Dowd; V V Halbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Comparative MRI compatibility of 316 L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents.

Authors:  Andrea Holton; Edward Walsh; Andreas Anayiotos; Gerald Pohost; Ramakrishna Venugopalan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Perfusion imaging.

Authors:  J A Detre; J S Leigh; D S Williams; A P Koretsky
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

Authors:  H J Barnett; D W Taylor; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; G G Ferguson; R B Haynes; R N Rankin; G P Clagett; V C Hachinski; D L Sackett; K E Thorpe; H E Meldrum; J D Spence
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Changes in perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid angioplasty with stent.

Authors:  A Tavares; J G Caldas; C C Castro; P Puglia; M E Frudit; L A Barbosa
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Rare complication characterized by late-onset transient neurological symptoms without hyperperfusion after carotid artery stenting: A report of three cases.

Authors:  Yutaka Fukushima; Ichiro Nakahara; Tsuyoshi Ohta; Shoji Matsumoto; Ryota Ishibashi; Masanori Gomi; Haruka Miyata; Hidehisa Nishi; Sadayoshi Watanabe
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Closed bore XMR (CBXMR) systems for aortic valve replacement: investigation of rotating-anode x-ray tube heat loadability.

Authors:  John A Bracken; Prasheel V Lillaney; Rebecca Fahrig; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Interventional magnetic resonance imaging guided carotid embolectomy using a novel resonant marker catheter: demonstration of preclinical feasibility.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Yang; Andre M Cote; Caroline D Jordan; Sravani Kondapavulur; Aaron D Losey; David McCoy; Andrew Chu; Jay F Yu; Teri Moore; Carol Stillson; Fabio Settecase; Matthew D Alexander; Andrew Nicholson; Daniel L Cooke; Maythem Saeed; Dave Barry; Alastair J Martin; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.838

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.