Literature DB >> 17518382

Multi-imager compatible actuation principles in surgical robotics.

D Stoianovici1.   

Abstract

Today's most successful surgical robots are perhaps surgeon-driven systems, such as the daVinci (Intuitive Surgical Inc., USA, www.intuitivesurgical.com). These have already enabled surgery that was unattainable with classic instrumentation; however, at their present level of development, they have limited utility. The drawback of these systems is that they are independent self-contained units, and as such, they do not directly take advantage of patient data. The potential of these new surgical tools lies much further ahead. Integration with medical imaging and information are needed for these devices to achieve their true potential. Surgical robots and especially their subclass of image-guided systems require special design, construction and control compared to industrial types, due to the special requirements of the medical and imaging environments. Imager compatibility raises significant engineering challenges for the development of robotic manipulators with respect to imager access, safety, ergonomics, and above all the non-interference with the functionality of the imager. These apply to all known medical imaging types, but are especially challenging for achieving compatibility with the class of MRI systems. Even though a large majority of robotic components may be redesigned to be constructed of MRI compatible materials, for other components such as the motors used in actuation, prescribing MRI compatible materials alone is not sufficient. The electromagnetic motors most commonly used in robotic actuation, for example, are incompatible by principle. As such, alternate actuation principles using "intervention friendly" energy should be adopted and/or devised for these special surgical and radiological interventions. This paper defines the new concept of Multi-Imager Compatibility of surgical manipulators and describes its requirements. Subsequently, the paper gives several recommendations and proposes new actuation principles for this concept. Several implementations have been constructed and tested, and the results are presented here. This is the first paper addressing these issues. Copyright 2005 Robotic Publications Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17518382      PMCID: PMC3116268          DOI: 10.1002/rcs.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  10 in total

1.  Towards MRI guided surgical manipulator.

Authors:  K Chinzei; K Miller
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  Robotic system for biopsy and therapy of breast lesions in a high-field whole-body magnetic resonance tomography unit.

Authors:  W A Kaiser; H Fischer; J Vagner; M Selig
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 3.  Neurosurgical suite of the future. II.

Authors:  F A Jolesz
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  ROBITOM-robot for biopsy and therapy of the mamma.

Authors:  A Felden; J Vagner; A Hinz; H Fischer; S O R Pfleiderer; J R Reichenbach; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.411

Review 5.  The operating room of the future: observations and commentary.

Authors:  Richard M Satava
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2003-09

6.  An MRI-compatible surgical robot for precise radiological interventions.

Authors:  Eckhard Hempel; Harald Fischer; Lothar Gumb; Thomas Höhn; Holger Krause; Udo Voges; Helmut Breitwieser; Bernd Gutmann; Jürgen Durke; Michael Bock; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2003

Review 7.  The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds.

Authors:  J F Schenck
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Development of an MRI-compatible needle insertion manipulator for stereotactic neurosurgery.

Authors:  K Masamune; E Kobayashi; Y Masutani; M Suzuki; T Dohi; H Iseki; K Takakura
Journal:  J Image Guid Surg       Date:  1995

Review 9.  Accessory equipment considerations with respect to MRI compatibility.

Authors:  E K Keeler; F X Casey; H Engels; E Lauder; C A Pirto; T Reisker; J Rogers; D J Schaefer; T Tynes
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Comparative MRI compatibility of 316 L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents.

Authors:  Andrea Holton; Edward Walsh; Andreas Anayiotos; Gerald Pohost; Ramakrishna Venugopalan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total
  15 in total

1.  Mutual interferences and design principles for mechatronic devices in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ningbo Yu; Roger Gassert; Robert Riener
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Interventional robotic systems: applications and technology state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Kevin Cleary; Andreas Melzer; Vance Watson; Gernot Kronreif; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.442

3.  Automatic brachytherapy seed placement under MRI guidance.

Authors:  Alexandru Patriciu; Doru Petrisor; Michael Muntener; Dumitru Mazilu; Michael Schär; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Robotic image-guided needle interventions of the prostate.

Authors:  Pierre C Mozer; Alan W Partin; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

5.  An MR-conditional high-torque pneumatic stepper motor for MRI-guided and robot-assisted intervention.

Authors:  Yue Chen; Ka-Wai Kwok; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  The Magnetohydrodynamic Effect and its Associated Material Designs for Biomedical Applications: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  T Stan Gregory; Rui Cheng; Guoyi Tang; Leidong Mao; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 18.808

7.  "MRI Stealth" robot for prostate interventions.

Authors:  Dan Stoianovici; Danny Song; Doru Petrisor; Daniel Ursu; Dumitru Mazilu; Michael Muntener; Michael Mutener; Michael Schar; Alexandru Patriciu
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.442

8.  MR Safe Robot, FDA Clearance, Safety and Feasibility Prostate Biopsy Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Dan Stoianovici; Chunwoo Kim; Doru Petrisor; Changhan Jun; Sunghwan Lim; Mark W Ball; Ashley Ross; Katarzyna J Macura; Mohamad Allaf
Journal:  IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.303

Review 9.  Advancements in magnetic resonance-guided robotic interventions in the prostate.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Macura; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12

Review 10.  Urologic robots and future directions.

Authors:  Pierre Mozer; Jocelyne Troccaz; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.