Literature DB >> 12464746

Role of magnetic resonance for assessing structure and function of trabecular bone.

Felix W Wehrli1, Punam K Saha, Bryon R Gomberg, Hee Kwon Song, Peter J Snyder, Maria Benito, Alex Wright, Richard Weening.   

Abstract

The strength of trabecular bone and its resistance to fracture traditionally have been associated with apparent density. This paradigm assumes that neither the ultrastructural nor microstructural make-up of the bone is altered during aging and osteoporosis. During the past decade there has been growing evidence from both laboratory and clinical studies against this view. Recent advances in noninvasive imaging technology, notably micro-magnetic resonance imaging (micro MRI) and computed tomography, offer an opportunity to test the hypothesis that architecture is an independent contributor to bone strength. MRI appears to be ideally suited for this task because bone marrow has uniform high signal intensity while bone appears with background intensity, thus yielding a binary system tomographic system. However, in vivo trabecular bone imaging is hampered by the limited signal-to-noise ratio that precludes voxel sizes much smaller than trabecular thickness, which would be required to yield a bimodal intensity histogram for segmentation of the image into bone and marrow. The resulting partial volume blurring leads to fuzzy boundaries. Successful structure analysis thus demands more elaborate processing strategies. This article reviews new approaches conceived in the authors' laboratory toward acquisition, processing, and structural analysis of trabecular bone images in the limited spatial resolution regimen of in vivo micro MRI. These methods are shown to provide detailed insight into the three-dimensional trabecular network topology and scale at the distal radius or distal tibia that typically serve as surrogate sites. The micro MRI-derived structural parameters are shown to be associated with the bone's biomechanical properties and fracture resistance. Further, the technology has advanced to a stage permitting serial studies in laboratory animals and humans as a means to evaluate the effects of treatment. The method currently is confined to peripheral skeletal sites, and its extension to typical fracture sites such as the proximal femur hinges on further advances in detection sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12464746     DOI: 10.1097/00002142-200210000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  48 in total

Review 1.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  In vivo estimation of bone stiffness at the distal femur and proximal tibia using ultra-high-field 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and micro-finite element analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Chamith S Rajapakse; James S Babb; Stephen P Honig; Michael P Recht; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Trabecular structure analysis using C-arm CT: comparison with MDCT and flat-panel volume CT.

Authors:  Catherine M Phan; Eric A Macklin; Miriam A Bredella; Monica Dadrich; Paul Flechsig; Albert J Yoo; Joshua A Hirsch; Rajiv Gupta
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Structural and mechanical parameters of trabecular bone estimated from in vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance images at 3 tesla field strength.

Authors:  Michael Jeffrey Wald; Jeremy Franklin Magland; Chamith Sudesh Rajapakse; Felix Werner Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Sex and ethnic differences in bone architecture.

Authors:  Dorothy A Nelson; Mary S Megyesi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Simultaneous measurement of T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (T2 +ADC) in the heart with motion-compensated spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Eric Aliotta; Kévin Moulin; Zhaohuan Zhang; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo.

Authors:  R Krug; J Carballido-Gamio; A J Burghardt; G Kazakia; B H Hyun; B Jobke; S Banerjee; M Huber; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  3-D X-Ray-Induced Acoustic Computed Tomography With a Spherical Array: A Simulation Study on Bone Imaging.

Authors:  Yang Li; Pratik Samant; Siqi Wang; A Behrooz; Dengwang Li; Liangzhong Xiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Skeletal effects of short-term exposure to dexamethasone and response to risedronate treatment studied in vivo in rabbits by magnetic resonance micro-imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Masaya Takahashi; Punam K Saha; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.