Literature DB >> 17992467

Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo.

R Krug1, J Carballido-Gamio, A J Burghardt, G Kazakia, B H Hyun, B Jobke, S Banerjee, M Huber, T M Link, S Majumdar.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In vivo high-resolution peripheral quantitative micro-CT (HR-pQCT) is a new modality for imaging peripheral sites like the distal tibia and the distal radius, providing structural bone parameters. Comparing HR-pQCT with MRI, we found that both modalities are capable of offering meaningful information on trabecular structure.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the leading in vivo method for measuring trabecular bone micro-architecture and providing structural information. Recently, an in vivo HR-pQCT modality was introduced for imaging peripheral sites like the distal tibia and the distal radius, providing structural bone parameters. The goal of this work was to compare and evaluate the performances and in vivo capabilities of HR-pQCT in comparison with MRI at 3 Tesla.
METHODS: To this end images of 8 human specimens (5 tibiae and 3 radii) and 11 participants (6 tibia and 5 radii) were acquired with both modalities. Additionally, the radius specimens were scanned with micro-CT (muCT), which was used as a standard of reference. Structural parameters calculated from MRI were compared with results from HR-pQCT images and additionally muCT for the radii specimens.
RESULTS: High correlations (r > 0.7) were found for trabecular number and trabecular spacing between the two modalities in vivo and ex vivo. 2D and 3D analysis revealed high correlations (r > 0.8) in structural bone parameters for all measurements. Using micro-CT as standard of reference both results from QCT and MRI correlated well.
CONCLUSION: Both imaging modalities were found to perform equally well regarding trabecular bone measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17992467     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0495-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  28 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10

2.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Application of refocused steady-state free-precession methods at 1.5 and 3 T to in vivo high-resolution MRI of trabecular bone: simulations and experiments.

Authors:  Suchandrima Banerjee; Eric T Han; Roland Krug; David C Newitt; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Fully balanced steady-state 3D-spin-echo (bSSSE) imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  R Krug; E T Han; S Banerjee; S Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  S Majumdar; M Kothari; P Augat; D C Newitt; T M Link; J C Lin; T Lang; Y Lu; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Assessment of trabecular structure using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Majumdar; H K Genant
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1997

7.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Bone mineral density and bone structure parameters as predictors of bone strength: an analysis using computerized microtomography and gastrectomy-induced osteopenia in the rat.

Authors:  M Stenström; B Olander; D Lehto-Axtelius; J E Madsen; L Nordsletten; G A Carlsson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Volker Vieth; Julia Matheis; David Newitt; Ying Lu; Ernst J Rummeny; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  An analysis of bone structure in patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  P J Uitewaal; P Lips; J C Netelenbos
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1987-10
View more
  28 in total

1.  Evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture in nonosteoporotic postmenopausal women with and without fracture.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Diane Kruger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Michael Kleerekoper; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Local bone enhancement fuzzy clustering for segmentation of MR trabecular bone images.

Authors:  Jenny Folkesson; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Felix Eckstein; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius-prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Melanie Kutscher; Dirk Müller; Christoph Räth; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  A trimodality comparison of volumetric bone imaging technologies. Part I: Short-term precision and validity.

Authors:  Andy K O Wong; Karen A Beattie; Kevin K H Min; Colin E Webber; Christopher L Gordon; Alexandra Papaioannou; Angela M W Cheung; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Association of larger holes in the trabecular bone at the distal radius in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to controls.

Authors:  Janet M Pritchard; Lora M Giangregorio; Stephanie A Atkinson; Karen A Beattie; Dean Inglis; George Ioannidis; Zubin Punthakee; J D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  In vivo 7.0-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist and hand: technical aspects and applications.

Authors:  Klaus M Friedrich; Gregory Chang; Renata L R Vieira; Ligong Wang; Graham C Wiggins; Mark E Schweitzer; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

10.  Assessment of trabecular bone structure using MDCT: comparison of 64- and 320-slice CT using HR-pQCT as the reference standard.

Authors:  Ahi S Issever; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Patrik Rogalla; Andrew J Burghardt; Galateia J Kazakia; Sharmila Majumdar; Gerd Diederichs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.