PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a new 3 Tesla (T) high-resolution trabecular bone (TB) imaging technique at two resolution regimens in terms of serial reproducibility and sensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The left distal tibial metaphysis of seven healthy volunteers was imaged at three time-points using a FLASE (fast large-angle spin-echo) pulse sequence at 137 x 137 x 410 mum(3) and (160 mum)(3) voxel sizes. Image artifacts, motion degradation, and serial image volume misalignments were controlled to maximize reproducibility of image-derived measures of scale, topology, orientation in terms of structural anisotropy, and finite-element derived Young's and shear moduli. Coefficients of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for structural and mechanical parameters were evaluated as measures of reproducibility and reliability. The ability of structural and mechanical parameters to distinguish between subjects was tested by analysis of variance. RESULTS: Reproducibility was generally higher in the anisotropic data (CVs 1-5% versus 1-9% for isotropic images). Anisotropic voxel size yielded greater measurement reliability (ICCs 0.75-0.99, mean = 0.92 versus 0.62-0.99, mean = 0.86) and better discrimination of the seven subjects (75% versus 50% of the possible comparisons were significantly different [P < 0.05]) except for measures of structural anisotropy and topology. Isotropic resolution improved detection of structural orientation and permitted visualization of small perforations in longitudinal trabecular plates not detected at anisotropic resolution. CONCLUSION: Improved image acquisition and processing techniques enhance reproducibility of structural and mechanical parameters derived from high-resolution MRI of metaphyseal bone in the distal tibia. Copyright 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a new 3 Tesla (T) high-resolution trabecular bone (TB) imaging technique at two resolution regimens in terms of serial reproducibility and sensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The left distal tibial metaphysis of seven healthy volunteers was imaged at three time-points using a FLASE (fast large-angle spin-echo) pulse sequence at 137 x 137 x 410 mum(3) and (160 mum)(3) voxel sizes. Image artifacts, motion degradation, and serial image volume misalignments were controlled to maximize reproducibility of image-derived measures of scale, topology, orientation in terms of structural anisotropy, and finite-element derived Young's and shear moduli. Coefficients of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for structural and mechanical parameters were evaluated as measures of reproducibility and reliability. The ability of structural and mechanical parameters to distinguish between subjects was tested by analysis of variance. RESULTS: Reproducibility was generally higher in the anisotropic data (CVs 1-5% versus 1-9% for isotropic images). Anisotropic voxel size yielded greater measurement reliability (ICCs 0.75-0.99, mean = 0.92 versus 0.62-0.99, mean = 0.86) and better discrimination of the seven subjects (75% versus 50% of the possible comparisons were significantly different [P < 0.05]) except for measures of structural anisotropy and topology. Isotropic resolution improved detection of structural orientation and permitted visualization of small perforations in longitudinal trabecular plates not detected at anisotropic resolution. CONCLUSION: Improved image acquisition and processing techniques enhance reproducibility of structural and mechanical parameters derived from high-resolution MRI of metaphyseal bone in the distal tibia. Copyright 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Maria Benito; Branimir Vasilic; Felix W Wehrli; Benjamin Bunker; Michael Wald; Bryon Gomberg; Alexander C Wright; Babette Zemel; Andrew Cucchiara; Peter J Snyder Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: D C Newitt; S Majumdar; B van Rietbergen; G von Ingersleben; S T Harris; H K Genant; C Chesnut; P Garnero; B MacDonald Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Michael J Wald; Jeremy F Magland; Chamith S Rajapakse; Yusuf A Bhagat; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Yusuf A Bhagat; Chamith S Rajapakse; Jeremy F Magland; James H Love; Alexander C Wright; Michael J Wald; Hee Kwon Song; Felix W Wehrli Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Yusuf A Bhagat; Chamith S Rajapakse; Jeremy F Magland; Michael J Wald; Hee Kwon Song; Mary B Leonard; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Ning Zhang; Jeremy F Magland; Chamith S Rajapakse; ShingChun Benny Lam; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Gregory Chang; Ligong Wang; Guoyuan Liang; James S Babb; Punam K Saha; Ravinder R Regatte Journal: MAGMA Date: 2011-01-09 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: James Rafferty; Lance Farr; Tim James; David Chase; John Heinrich; Michael Brady Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.118