Literature DB >> 16036085

Sex and ethnic differences in bone architecture.

Dorothy A Nelson1, Mary S Megyesi.   

Abstract

Technologic developments and applications such as dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography have enabled researchers to assess bone quantity (ie, bone mineral density) and bone quality (ie, bone architecture), which are two important and independent contributions to bone strength. Recent studies on sex differences in bone architecture indicate that a number of biomechanical variables lead to increased bone strength in males compared with females. Ethnic differences in bone architecture are less clear-cut, indicating a need to identify and test the social and biologic variables that race and ethnicity represent. New methods using magnetic resonance imaging technology may become important in creating efficient and reliable in vivo methods of assessing features of bone architecture that are relevant to fracture risk and contribute to the elucidation of sex and ethnic differences in osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16036085     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-004-0006-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  38 in total

1.  Cross-sectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D A Nelson; D A Barondess; S L Hendrix; T J Beck
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Hip axis length in mid-life Japanese and Caucasian U.S. residents: no evidence for an ethnic difference.

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; Jean T Young; Mei-Hua Huang; Alexander Bucur; Yan Wang; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Sex differences in geometry of the femoral neck with aging: a structural analysis of bone mineral data.

Authors:  T J Beck; C B Ruff; W W Scott; C C Plato; J D Tobin; C A Quan
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  White, European, Western, Caucasian, or what? Inappropriate labeling in research on race, ethnicity, and health.

Authors:  R Bhopal; L Donaldson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone.

Authors:  J Y Rho; L Kuhn-Spearing; P Zioupos
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Histomorphometric assessment of bone mass, structure, and remodeling: a comparison between healthy black and white premenopausal women.

Authors:  M Parisien; F Cosman; D Morgan; M Schnitzer; X Liang; J Nieves; L Forese; M Luckey; D Meier; V Shen; R Lindsay; D W Dempster
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Effect of ethnicity and age or menopause on the structure and geometry of iliac bone.

Authors:  Z H Han; S Palnitkar; D S Rao; D Nelson; A M Parfitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Osteoporosis and fracture of the femoral neck in the South African Bantu.

Authors:  L Solomon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1968-02

9.  Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Volker Vieth; Julia Matheis; David Newitt; Ying Lu; Ernst J Rummeny; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M McClung; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  5 in total

1.  Socioeconomic influences on bone health in postmenopausal women: findings from NHANES III, 1988-1994.

Authors:  May-Choo Wang; L Beth Dixon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry in plain anterior-posterior radiograph in eastern-Indian population.

Authors:  Sanchita Roy; Rajib Kundu; Shyamalendu Medda; Avanish Gupta; Baljit Kaur Nanrah
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

3.  Alveolar bone level is not associated with vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and bone density in mandible.

Authors:  Francisco Mesa; Alejandro Gonzalez; Nizar Souki; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Asunción Olmo; Francisco O'Valle; Manuel Bravo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Is there a relation between local bone quality as assessed on panoramic radiographs and alveolar bone level?

Authors:  Olivia Nackaerts; Frieda Gijbels; Anna-Maria Sanna; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Increasing shape modelling accuracy by adjusting for subject positioning: an application to the analysis of radiographic proximal femur symmetry using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  C Lindner; G A Wallis; T F Cootes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.