Literature DB >> 12372145

Conservation of long-range synteny and microsynteny between the genomes of two distantly related nematodes.

D B Guiliano1, N Hall, S J M Jones, L N Clark, C H Corton, B G Barrell, M L Blaxter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparisons between the genomes of the closely related nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae reveal high rates of rearrangement, with a bias towards within-chromosome events. To assess whether this pattern is true of nematodes in general, we have used genome sequence to compare two nematode species that last shared a common ancestor approximately 300 million years ago: the model C. elegans and the filarial parasite Brugia malayi.
RESULTS: An 83 kb region flanking the gene for Bm-mif-1 (macrophage migration inhibitory factor, a B. malayi homolog of a human cytokine) was sequenced. When compared to the complete genome of C. elegans, evidence for conservation of long-range synteny and microsynteny was found. Potential C. elegans orthologs for II of the 12 protein-coding genes predicted in the B. malayi sequence were identified. Ten of these orthologs were located on chromosome I, with eight clustered in a 2.3 Mb region. While several, relatively local, intrachromosomal rearrangements have occurred, the order, composition, and configuration of two gene clusters, each containing three genes, was conserved. Comparison of B. malayi BAC-end genome survey sequence to C. elegans also revealed a bias towards intrachromosome rearrangements.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that intrachromosomal rearrangement is a major force driving chromosomal organization in nematodes, but is constrained by the interdigitation of functional elements of neighboring genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12372145      PMCID: PMC134624          DOI: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-10-research0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Biol        ISSN: 1474-7596            Impact factor:   13.583


Background

All genomes encode conserved genes. The arrangement of these genes on chromosomal elements is determined by a balance between stochastic rearrangements and functional constraints. The level of conservation of gene order (synteny) and linkage between two genomes will depend on the relative contributions of inter- and intrachromosomal rearrangements. Whereas shared ancestry and functional constraints will increase conservation of linkage and synteny between taxa, rearrangement events will tend to randomize gene order over time. In the Metazoa, several gene clusters have been identified that remain linked because of functional constraints. These include the histone genes [1], the Hox gene clusters [2], the immunoglobulin cluster [3], and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) [4], but most genes are believed to be free to move within the genome. The tempo of gene rearrangement varies between taxa [5,6]. Vertebrate chromosomes are mosaic structures containing large conserved segments that can reside in different linkage groups in different species. There is a surprising conservation of synteny between distantly related species (approximately 450 million years (Myr) divergence) [7]. However, some lineages, such as rodents, show more extensive rearrangement than others, such as teleosts. In protostomes, comparative studies of the genomes of closely related dipterans (Drosophila sp. and Aedes aegypti [5,8]) and nematodes (Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae [6,9]) revealed a high rate of rearrangement. Chromosome rearrangements between closely related Drosophila species are mainly large pericentric inversions that may be facilitated by flanking transposon sequences [10,11]. C. elegans and C. briggsae are closely related, with estimates of 25-120 Myr divergence based on sequence comparisons [6,12]. Two groups have attempted to assess genome rearrangement rates and modes in comparisons between these two species. Kent and Zahler [9] compared 8.1 megabases (Mb) of fragmentary C. briggsae sequence derived from sequenced cosmid clones to C. elegans and derived a mean syntenic fragment length of 8.6 klobases (kb), or approximately 1.8 genes (there is one gene per 5 kb in C. elegans) [13]. In contrast, Coghlan and Wolfe [6], comparing 12.9 Mb of C. briggsae cosmid-derived sequence, found a mean syntenic fragment length of 53 kb. The difference appears to be purely methodological, as Kent and Zahler analyzed a subset of the data of Coghlan and Wolfe, and probably derives from a more relaxed definition of matching genes and use of cosmid fingerprinting physical map information by the latter study [6]. Estimation of rates of intrachromosomal to between-chromosome rearrangements showed that both were very frequent (approximately fourfold greater than that observed in D. melanogaster). Again, repeat sequences were associated with rearrangement boundaries [6]. It remains to be established whether this high rate of rearrangement is peculiar to the Caenorhabditis lineage, or is a general feature of nematode genomes. To address this question we have begun analysis of a third nematode genome, that of the human filarial parasite Brugia malayi, which is estimated to have last shared a common ancestor with C. elegans 300-500 Myr ago [14]. B. malayi has a genome size of 100 Mb [15] and a gene complement estimated to be similar to C. elegans [16], and is the subject of a mature, expressed sequence tag (EST)-based genome project [16,17]. Unlike C. elegans, which has five autosomes and an XX/Xo sex-determination system [18], B. malayi has four autosomes and an XX/XY system [19]. The small size of condensed nematode chromosomes has precluded accurate in situ analysis of conservation of gene order. We have therefore taken a sequence-based approach, and here compare an 83 kb region surrounding the B. malayi macrophage-migration-inhibitory factor 1 locus (Bm-mif-1), a B. malayi homolog of a vertebrate cytokine [20], to the C. elegans genome and have found evidence for conservation of linkage and microsynteny between these two distantly related nematodes. The general features of this comparison were confirmed using a survey of genome sequences from B. malayi.

Results

General sequence features of an 83 kb segment of the B. malayi genome

Two overlapping bacterial artificial chromosome clones (BACs) were isolated that spanned the Bm-mif-1 locus. The inserts of BMBAC01L03 and BMBAC01P19 were 28,757 base pairs (bp) and 64,685 bp, respectively, with 10,637 bp of overlap, yielding a contiguated sequence of 82,805 bp (Figure 1). AT content overall was 68.0%; exonic DNA had an AT content of 59.9% and intergenic and intronic DNA had AT contents of 69.3% and 70.4% respectively. The average predicted gene size was 4.7 kb (range 0.6-20 kb). The average distance between genes was 3.1 kb (range 0.3-10.5 kb), giving an average gene density of one gene per 6.9 kb. There was an average of 9.3 introns per gene, with an average intron length of 316 bp (range 48-2,767 bp). The C. elegans orthologs of the B. malayi genes (see below) had a mean length of 3.2 kb, with an average of 5.5 introns per gene (mean size of 142 bp). The B. malayi genes were longer as a result of increased mean length and number of introns. Comparison to C. elegans presumed orthologs (see below) showed that only 50% of C. elegans introns were conserved in B. malayi (29 of 56 introns), and 25% of B. malayi introns (29 of 107) were conserved in C. elegans (Table 1). Of the 12 predicted B. malayi genes, seven were tested and confirmed by cDNA-PCR, and alternatively spliced transcripts were identified for four. Five of the 12 genes had corresponding ESTs (Table 1).
Figure 1

The BMBAC01L03/BMBAC01P19 contig compared to the C. elegans genome. Genes are indicated by exon (box) and intron (bracket) structures. For each species, the direction of transcription of the genes is indicated by an arrow. The C. elegans gene structures are drawn to the same scale as the B. malayi contig. A, Match to B. malayi EST cluster BMC03169 [16]. Brugia EST (BMC) and Onchocerca volvulus (OVC) clusters are viewable in NemBase [39,60]. B, Highly similar to O. volvulus EST cluster OVC02481 [61]. C, Match to B. malayi EST cluster BMC00238. D, Match to B. malayi EST clusters BMC02055 and BMC01932. However, no ORF was identified, and it may not represent protein-coding sequence (see text for discussion). E, Match to B. malayi EST cluster BMC06334. F, Match to B. malayi EST cluster BMC00400. G, BMBAC01L03.1 and BMBAC01P19.7 are gene fragments. Percent identity was calculated on the alignable portion of the C. elegans ortholog. H, F13G3.9 (Ce-mif-3) is on C. elegans chromosome I. However, F13G3.9 is not the predicted ortholog of Bm-mif-1 and thus the relationship is indicated by a dashed arrow (see text). I, Percent identity was calculated for BMBAC01P19.3 and BMBAC01L03.4 only within the PWWP or dnaJ domains respectively. Homolog pairs are indicated by the colouring of the gene models.

Table 1

Genes predicted on the BMBAC01L03/BMBAC01P19 contig

B. malayi open reading framePredicted cDNA length (bp)Predicted peptide lengthNumber of intronsC. elegans orthologPercent identity with C. elegans orthologNumber of introns in C. elegans orthologNumber of shared intron positions with C. elegans orthologPutative identity
BMBAC01L03.11340*446*7*CeF14B4.35833Amino-terminal fragment of the β subunit of RNA polymerase I
BMBAC01L03.26932306CeF43G9.56831Pre-mRNA cleavage factor
BMBAC01L03.312394128----Contains LON-ATP-dependent serine protease domain
BMBAC01L03.46302092CeF39B2.1057§31Contains dnaJ domain
BMBAC01L03.59183056CeF43G9.35862Mitochondrial carrier protein
BMBAC01P19.1 (Bm-mif-1)5351152CeY56A3A.34122Macrophage-migration- inhibitory factor homolog
BMBAC01P19.2a/b (Bm-pbr-1)5955/57481934/186537/35CeC26C6.134149Polybromo domain protein, BAF180 homolog
BMBAC01P19.3 a/b1182/919367/2839/7CeF43G9.44482Contains PWWP domain
BMBAC01P19.4 (Bm-dap-1)4461111CeT28F4.53011Homolog of mammalian death- associated protein DAP-1
BMBAC01P19.5a/b (Bm-ubr-1)2679/2602847/82118/17CeT28F4.427125Unknown
BMBAC01P19.68041904CeF31C3.54111Conserved protein of unknown function
BMBAC01P19.7a/b1039/932*274/298*6/7*CeC36B1.1260#32Carboxy-terminal fragment of a novel transmembrane protein

*Gene fragments (see text). †BMBAC01L03.1 gene fragment aligned with the amino-terminal 450 amino acids of CeF14B4.3. ‡Number of introns in the aligned portion of the C. elegans ortholog. §Percent identity over the dnaJ domains of BMBAC01L03.4 and CeF39B2.10. ¶ Percent identity over the PWWP domains of BMBAC01P19.3 and CeF43G9.4. #The gene fragment of BMBAC01P19.7 aligned with the carboxy-terminal 380 amino acids of CeC36B1.12.

Comparison of predicted genes to C. elegans

All 12 predicted genes had C. elegans homologs, but putative orthology could only be assigned to 11 pairs (Figure 1, Table 1). Orthology definition is possibly problematic, as the complete genome sequence of B. malayi is not known, and it is thus possible that genes more similar to these C. elegans comparators could be present. We note, however, that no B. malayi EST-defined genes (23,000 ESTs defining approximately 8,300 genes [16]) have better matches to these C. elegans proteins (data not shown), and that orthology definition included coextension of the proteins, and conservation of intron position and phase (Table 1). The exception, BMBAC01L03.3, contained two domains, an amino-terminal LON ATP-dependent serine protease domain (domain PF02190) and an anonymous carboxy-terminal domain (PFB022940). Proteins predicted from the Arabidopsis thaliana (AAC42255.1), Mus musculus (NP_067424), and Homo sapiens (XP_0421219) genomes share this architecture, but there are no C. elegans proteins that have both domains. Some genes were similar to hypothetical, functionally uncharacterized genes from C. elegans. BMBAC01P19.7a/b had multiple predicted transmembrane segments also found in a number of peptides from other species (PFB002843) and were most similar to C36B1.12 (60% identity). There is only one homolog of BMBAC01P19.3a in any organism -F43G9.4 from C. elegans. The amino termini of both BMBAC01P19.3a and F43G9.4 contained PWWP domains (PF00855). PWWP domains are found in proteins with nuclear location and roles in cell growth and differentiation [21,22]. PSORT profiling indicated that BMBAC01P19.3 and F43G9.4 were likely to have nuclear localizations. The amino terminus of BMBAC01L03.4 contains a dnaJ-like domain (PF00684). The dnaJ domain is found in 41 C. elegans proteins, but BMBAC01L03.4 showed highest identity (57%) to F39B2.10. Both proteins had the dnaJ domain at their amino terminus and shared a common position of the first intron in this region. The remainder of the protein was not conserved. BMBAC01P19.1 encodes Bm-mif-1 (Figure 2) [20]. Mammalian MIF is a cytokine involved in inflammation, growth, and differentiation of immune cells [23]: B. malayi MIF-1 may have a role in immunomodulation of the host [20,24]. C. elegans has four MIF-like genes: Ce-mif-1 (Y56A3A.3), Ce-mif-2 (C52E4.2), Ce-mif-3 (F13G3.9), and Ce-mif-4 (Y73B6BL.13). Transgenic reporter and immunolocalization studies suggest that C. elegans MIFs may have roles in development and the dauer stage [13,25]. Bm-MIF-1 has highest pairwise similarity to Ce-MIF-1 (41% compared to 23-29% for the other three paralogues; Figure 2) [20], and phylogenetic analysis of over seventy MIF-like proteins from eukaryotes confirms this assignment (D.B.G. and M.L.B., manuscript in preparation). Comparison of Bm-MIF-1 to the C. elegans MIFs, a second B. malayi MIF (Bm-MIF-2), and human MIF-1 (Figure 2) revealed that Bm-mif-1 and Ce-mif-1 shared two intron/exon boundaries also found in vertebrate MIFs. One of these introns was also present in Ce-mif-3, but Ce-mif-3 and the other two C. elegans mif genes shared a set of introns not present in the mif-1 genes. Bm-MIF-1 and other filarial MIF-1 homologs contain a CXXC motif (single-letter amino-acid code) critical for the thiol-oxidoreductase activities of vertebrate MIF [26]. None of the C. elegans MIF homologs contained this motif.
Figure 2

Comparison of B. malayi and C. elegans MIF proteins. Bm-MIF-1 (accession AAC82502) was aligned with human Hs-MIF-1(AAA21814), C. elegans MIF homologs Ce-MIF-1 (CAB60512), Ce-MIF-2 (CAB01412), Ce-MIF-3 (CAA95795), Ce-MIF-4 (AAG23475), and Bm-MIF-2b (AAF91074). Intron positions are marked by triangles (red, conserved with Hs-MIF-1; blue, Ce-MIF-2, -3 and -4 specific). The proline at position 2 (white) is important for immune function, and the CXXC motif at positions 60-63 is essential for thiol-oxidoreductase activity in mammalian MIF. The percent identity of each protein to Bm-MIF-1 is given at the end of the alignment.

Conserved gene clusters

Two clusters of three genes in close proximity are conserved. The first involves BMBAC01L03.2, .3 and .5. The C. elegans orthologs of these genes are F43G9.5, F43G9.4, and F43G9.3 respectively. F43G9.5 and F43G9.3 are divergently transcribed from a 631 bp intergenic region. F43G9.3 is followed by F43G9.4 in the same transcriptional orientation with 501 bp separating the genes. In B. malayi this local synteny is conserved, except that two additional genes - BMBAC01L03.3 and .4 - are found between BMBAC01L03.2 and .5. The second cluster also involves three genes. Proteins predicted from both alternative transcripts of BMBAC01P19.2 were found to be homologous to large proteins from Homo sapiens (BAF180, AAG34760 [27]), Gallus gallus (JC5056 [28]), D. melanogaster (CG11375, AAF56339), and C. elegans (C26C6.1) (Figure 3). These proteins shared six bromodomains (PF00439), two BAH domains (bromo-adjacent homology, PF01426), a HMG box (high mobility group, PF00505), and an anonymous carboxy-terminal domain (PFB007669). The B. malayi, C. elegans, and D. melanogaster polybromodomain (PBR) proteins also contain two C2H2 zinc fingers. PBR proteins may be involved in chromatin-remodeling complexes. Bromodomains interact with acetylated lysine in histone complexes, while HMG boxes are found in chromatin proteins that bind to single-stranded DNA and unwind double-stranded DNA. Human BAF180 has been shown to localize to the kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes [27]. None of the vertebrate PBR homologs contains zinc fingers, which may indicate additional functions for the nematode and fly proteins.
Figure 3

The pbr synteny cluster and pbr homologs in other species. The genomic organization of the pbr synteny cluster in C. elegans and B. malayi, and the domain structure of the PBR homologs in Drosophila melanogaster, Gallus gallus, and Homo sapiens are illustrated. Intron/exon boundaries that are conserved between the nematodes are indicated by asterisks. White boxes represent the contiguous DNA underlying the gene models.

Two conserved genes were identified immediately upstream from pbr-1 (Figure 3). BMBAC01P19.5 (named Bm-ubr-1 (upstream of pbr-1)) showed significant similarity only to T28F4.4 from C. elegans (27% identity). The protein encoded by BMBAC01P19.4 is homologous to C. elegans T28F4.5 (30% identity). Iterative searches of GenBank using PSI-BLAST [29] indicated that BMBAC01P19.4 and T28F4.5 belong to a group of small peptides that include human DAP-1 (death-associated protein). DAP-1 is a nuclear protein and positive regulator of interferon gamma-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells [30]. PSORT profiling indicated that both nematode proteins may have a nuclear localization. BMBAC01P19.2 (Bm-pbr-1) and BMBAC01P19.5 (Bm-ubr-1) are divergently transcribed and BMABAC01P19.4 (Bm-dap-1) is found in the large third intron of BMBAC01P19.5 in the same transcriptional orientation as BMBAC01P19.2 (Figure 3). In the C. elegans instance of the PBR cluster, C26C6.1 (Ce-pbr-1) and T28F4.4 (Ce-ubr-1) are also divergently transcribed from a 1,233 bp intergenic region. The third gene, T28F4.5 (Ce-dap-1) is found in the large third intron of T28F4.4 on the same strand as C26C6.1. Comparison of the intergenic and upstream regions of both clusters, and of the orthologous gene pairs, did not reveal any clear motifs that might be involved in transcriptional regulation. In particular, the intergenic DNA between pbr-1 and ubr-1, and the first intron of ubr-1, had less than 30% pairwise identity throughout, and there were no stretches of greater identity. The AT richness of the B. malayi genome compared to C. elegans may obscure any conserved elements. No RNA-coding genes were found. Two B. malayi ESTs matched at > 99.5% identity to two regions of BMBAC01P19 separated by 200 bp that were not predicted to be part of a transcript (see Figure 1). These regions are downstream of gene BMBAC01P19.3, and may derive from alternative 3' untranslated regions: the furthest downstream match includes a good polyadenylation site. The 3' end of the cDNA determined for this gene may have derived from internal priming from an A-rich segment of the 3' untranslated region.

Fractured synteny between the genomes of B. malayi and C. elegans

All of the C. elegans orthologs, except for Y56A3A.3 (Ce-mif-1, 41% identity to Bm-mif-1, on chromosome III), are located on chromosome I (Figure 4). F13G3.9 (Ce-mif-3, 23% identity to Bm-mif-1) is found on C. elegans chromosome I in close proximity to the orthologs of B. malayi genes BMBAC01P19.2, .4, and .5. This could suggest that our orthology assignment is wrong. As described above, however, Ce-mif-1 and Bm-mif-1 share two intron positions and are more similar to each other than either is to Ce-mif-3, which has one concordant intron position, and one discordant intron position. The conflict between location and structure could be due to a gene-conversion event in either lineage, or an event of directed movement or insertion.
Figure 4

Comparison of linkage and synteny with C. elegans. The B. malayi contig is compared to an approximately 9 Mb segment of C. elegans chromosome I. The relative positions of the ortholog pairs, colored as in Figure 1, are indicated. The link between Bm-mif-1 and Ce-mif-3 (F13G3.9) is dashed to indicate that these two genes are paralogs rather than orthologs (see text for details).

Eight of the 10 remaining C. elegans orthologs lay within a 2.3 Mb region in the center of chromosome I (6.7-9 Mb) (Figure 4). The orthologs of the other two genes (BMBACoLo3.4 and BMBAC01P19.6) are found at the distal tip of chromosome I. While there has been extensive rearrangement of gene order, when compared to the C. elegans orthologs, 10 of the B. malayi genes were in the same relative transcriptional orientation. Examination of the boundaries of the C. elegans cluster and individual gene regions did not show any association with repeat-sequence classes, including those shown to be commonly associated with rearrangements between C. elegans and C. briggsae [6].

Genome survey sequence comparison and synteny

To ascertain whether the segment sequenced was representative of the relationship between the B. malayi genome and that of C. elegans, we surveyed the B. malayi BAC-end derived genome survey sequences (GSSs; J. Daub, C. Whitton, N.H., M. Quail and M.L.B., unpublished observations). There are over 18,000 GSSs from B. malayi, derived from three independent libraries. Each BAC-end sequence was compared to the C. elegans proteome (Wormpep [31]) and significant similarities recorded (BLASTX probabilities < e-8). The chromosomal position of each matching C. elegans protein was derived from Wormbase [32]. One hundred and sixty-four BACs had matches at both ends to C. elegans proteins under these conditions (summarized in Table 2, details in Table 3). We note that these matches are not necessarily to orthologs, as we have not carried out intensive analysis of each one, but random selection of genes should not yield greater linkage estimation despite the problem of gene families and domain matches. While much of the C. elegans proteome consists of protein families, very few of these have a chromosomally restricted distribution [33,34].
Table 2

Synteny conservation between B. malayi BAC-end genome survey sequences and C. elegans genome sequence

Maximal probability of either of blast matchesNumber of BACs with both ends matching C. elegans proteinsNumber of BACs with both ends matching C. elegans proteins on the same chromosomeDistance between C. elegans proteins (megabases)Percentage of matches on same chromosome
<e-8164904.454.88
<e-10138784.656.52
<e-1551294.756.86
<e-2017105.358.82

B. malayi BAC end sequences were compared to the C. elegans proteome using BLASTX. Matches with a probability

Table 3

B. malayi BAC end comparisons to C. elegans

T7 endSP6 end


Brugia malayi BAC cloneC. elegans matchC. elegans chromosomePosition on chromosomeExponent of probability in BLAST searchC. elegans matchC. elegans chromosomePosition on chromosomeExponent of probability in BLAST searchDistance between matches
BMBAC01M03CE27661IV784408018CE03144II1159244530NA
BMBAC01I11CE12826II212562724CE27131X1243421012NA
BMBAC01O12CE12384IV1153621721CE24899X1054021613NA
BMBAC01I15CE07931X113852011CE00450III79269869NA
BMBAC01F17CE06551V1171141818CE00946III466833818NA
BMBAC01F18CE06551V1171141818CE00946III466833818NA
BMBAC03I06CE04396X470237112CE01008III343692617NA
BMBAC03F12CE22809IV109614529CE28366V268843815NA
BMBAC03O15CE29604I1015110424CE08947V1198472210NA
BMBAC03F17CE00316III982106222CE14390V65008098NA
BMBAC03J17CE20445IV356275423CE15856II132016609NA
BMBAC04M12CE14750I46194539CE17599V1452003611NA
BMBAC04B14CE26776IV280030636CE03447X1058373836NA
BMBAC04B18CE01099III930355445CE16711V1844941043NA
BMBAC06B01CE15044V430444223CE26600I149424710NA
BMBAC07G03CE07756II30327769CE13435I613503220NA
BMBAC08D11CE22116II1415123416CE17662I918897719NA
BMBAC08E17CE18356I366358217CE24671X180070813NA
BMBAC09F11CE08682I416259213CE08947V1198472210NA
BMBAC09K18CE26381IV721008126CE27040III149179112NA
BMBAC09A22CE24671X180070838CE14734II114394133NA
BMBAC10N08CE14734II114394129CE11078X1466656618NA
BMBAC11P11CE18826I1258098663CE01074III476123739NA
BMBAC301H09CE00436III896690415CE03397II1003335110NA
BMBAC303G12CE25661X1008872512CE28910IV1209605137NA
BMBAC305D10CE05811IV1222278610CE26022I1379006813NA
BMBAC306C12CE19038II1200156610CE17716V582844125NA
BMBAC307F09CE26106III1121418814CE24397I39895212NA
BMBAC308B07CE01495III42432419CE23997I430162152NA
BMBAC308E07CE10254V859649716CE22541IV105885139NA
BMBAC309G05CE19946V1365219310CE20405I1012117021NA
BMBAC310G03CE00169III856027616CE03487IV1110153820NA
BMBAC310F07CE26106III1121418820CE17565I128975549NA
BMBAC311D10CE05492IV904522011CE09323I835744611NA
BMBAC312B12CE03263X1278559711CE20461II1135834428NA
BMBAC314G02CE04726X750057115CE16564III1077950814NA
BMBAC314G05CE04726X750057115CE16564III1077950814NA
BMBAC314C06CE14448V830322013CE25695III769780123NA
BMBAC321E09CE00901III377719628CE04196IV717187327NA
BMBAC324A05CE23883X1064042610CE24718IV970883715NA
BMBAC325E11CE24076IV1617043927CE20681III394209019NA
BMBAC327E05CE29377II1424940221CE05190I71477299NA
BMBAC328H12CE11268I605625127CE20346IV35958433NA
BMBAC331C11CE00639III1052464412CE07306V811063239NA
BMBAC332H10CE03812X1137410241CE03398II1003092718NA
BMBAC335D03CE00713III682098937CE26022I1379006810NA
BMBAC335B06CE03657X1288083836CE28110II1207219515NA
BMBAC335H06CE04374III709373529CE27906II721833912NA
BMBAC335B11CE28095II647436111CE12664IV106270779NA
BMBAC335G11CE14211II52666212CE00644III44171529NA
BMBAC338H04CE21000I360920339CE01643II806639757NA
BMBAC340C01CE08947V1198472212CE06100I796369110NA
BMBAC340H10CE24671X180070828CE28961II851842511NA
BMBAC341A06CE24422II1515382810CE26560IV263778514NA
BMBAC341H09CE20297I1096269219CE07462X1682132118NA
BMBAC342D11CE27040III149179114CE11074X1464509711NA
BMBAC352C10CE00713III682098944CE26022I1379006818NA
BMBAC353A03CE00949III469494610CE06100I796369118NA
BMBAC353E06CE09682IV1726973248CE02716II460901410NA
BMBAC354G08CE24000X1389976116CE21401I1274795734NA
BMBAC354C09CE16562III1080899223CE17579IV11780459NA
BMBAC355C03CE04838IV722530612CE21023I249603424NA
BMBAC356B08CE06116V1035524711CE26971I31140214NA
BMBAC357C02CE14754I462418724CE19593III86749812NA
BMBAC360E07CE06034IV1173305215CE02044II673683911NA
BMBAC362E03CE05492IV904522011CE28001III602077016NA
BMBAC365D07CE15463IV1287170916CE01508II1138482112NA
BMBAC365F09CE15612V1025052710CE05747IV1240191520NA
BMBAC365D11CE15892I1309109313CE28340III133282819NA
BMBAC368B08CE21026X812557415CE09880I889884616NA
BMBAC374G02CE24292II1268162011CE06704IV598716518NA
BMBAC375H10CE01537II958826015CE04726X750057115NA
BMBAC376D04CE02705II59186749CE29504IV421296017NA
BMBAC377D05CE03061X1296673014CE15044V430444210NA
BMBAC01G04CE12942II16314212CE15754II134430711913279929
BMBAC01J11CE17559III372972113CE27691III6439903142710182
BMBAC01N16CE19942II615785620CE01090II7858336151700480
BMBAC01A23CE27862I49522228CE16340I1323968688287464
BMBAC01M24CE02307II1022277915CE04813II4902586255320193
BMBAC02F03CE01008III343692630CE02018III5268852171831926
BMBAC02M10CE18369IV1496598526CE27782IV329531314933032
BMBAC03D10CE01563II1014675011CE18563II14006392103859642
BMBAC03L15CE27488IV297603413CE20122IV12679870309703836
BMBAC03O17CE27311III161685313CE00946III4668338203051485
BMBAC03J24CE21971II1272719217CE22157II1367069212943500
BMBAC04P08CE17474IV803483613CE06702IV5987165372047671
BMBAC04J10CE17474IV803483612CE06702IV5987165352047671
BMBAC04G15CE03492III1046521214CE01161III5016428295448784
BMBAC04L18CE26381IV721008123CE06302IV10375062233164981
BMBAC06H01CE16413V1122288411CE08630V4818967136403917
BMBAC07C02CE13736I56169929CE18454I7384257271767265
BMBAC07C06CE28324X483073221CE23711X14708595249877863
BMBAC07E21CE16194III1081863133CE26632III12724299461905668
BMBAC07C22CE16565III1078412812CE17401III3778796167005332
BMBAC08P03CE27215X662685221CE09403X4445872162180980
BMBAC09E01CE25011III703123812CE24009III4722390102308848
BMBAC09B17CE25196II291391615CE18730II11578670118664754
BMBAC09E19CE22045III1131705112CE20681III3942090237374961
BMBAC09J20CE27601IV369467513CE17308IV3625656969019
BMBAC09A24CE04504IV831558237CE29005IV6345808121969774
BMBAC10M23CE01473II802319013CE28454II5867637172155553
BMBAC11H08CE11494II1087281420CE03412II1154561017672796
BMBAC11K08CE28485IV1684589521CE06705IV59871654510858730
BMBAC11C09CE21401I1274795712CE08532I3704246139043711
BMBAC11H20CE08377I1011704320CE17566I12903800162786757
BMBAC13A23CE29235II699586110CE23659II13251947196256086
BMBAC301F09CE28770V74000989CE06116V10355247132955149
BMBAC303H10CE18123X1076855112CE04392X5627431155141120
BMBAC303E12CE01105III399260728CE05066III6081444392088837
BMBAC306B02CE19437IV193517812CE06634IV119852243010050046
BMBAC306F02CE21208V114171769CE15044V4304442467112734
BMBAC306B09CE05594IV1157400510CE18268IV2620091211311996
BMBAC309A07CE27186II149013120CE20311II147941311813304000
BMBAC309H07CE15235I658610012CE15751I8715988132129888
BMBAC311C01CE26713X1083067211CE05839X14719098163888426
BMBAC312B02CE23530II988694521CE05732II989269295747
BMBAC318E08CE03335II900607232CE01731II10094778331088706
BMBAC320B05CE24687I1350525032CE10608I5535918187969332
BMBAC321D05CE03487IV1110153812CE06601IV12361570121260032
BMBAC323H11CE28173II704596712CE03349II8811285121765318
BMBAC326G05CE18454I738425716CE19979I14650506177266249
BMBAC327F03CE05372I865641820CE17767I14934285156277867
BMBAC327E08CE22135II1328002518CE03397II10033351143246674
BMBAC329E10CE26424III726816810CE26172III2584463134683705
BMBAC333B09CE06291III985306221CE00018III954236218310700
BMBAC335G07CE23108V1890770425CE08145V72075352411700169
BMBAC336F09CE23823V90479812CE08939V10165831109261033
BMBAC338B09CE19930IV1149457812CE27358IV12787708121293130
BMBAC339A05CE03536X1115682119CE29169X15581083104424262
BMBAC340B12CE28433V1259129111CE06114V10352190212239101
BMBAC341B01CE06362IV1113102728CE17284IV5070581010623969
BMBAC344B10CE27691III64399039CE18868III13830997167391094
BMBAC345G11CE16052III1350716417CE01319III7408460226098704
BMBAC346C07CE20899III906680742CE06204III1098323991916432
BMBAC348D09CE27859X467161713CE03447X10583738145912121
BMBAC349D02CE28454II586763730CE01473II8023190152155553
BMBAC349A03CE01694II964784122CE01697II9649394301553
BMBAC350E01CE05839X1471909831CE28227X10830175113888923
BMBAC350F06CE07421IV752126717CE17427IV606450116914817
BMBAC351D02CE17559III372972137CE29455III7295192143565471
BMBAC351E11CE04813II490258615CE01843II631812891415542
BMBAC352A02CE16057X983570716CE23711X14708595134872888
BMBAC352H11CE27011III238628922CE23035III12323434409937145
BMBAC354D02CE09506V1376761415CE26193V7064763116702851
BMBAC354C06CE28000V568045519CE18785V14010680108330225
BMBAC357F01CE07705I516061515CE17689I7197186122036571
BMBAC357D06CE05481V990947810CE18731V12911699113002221
BMBAC360G09CE26686V1988924920CE12204V12228547137660702
BMBAC361F02CE21971II1272719215CE24422II15153828142426636
BMBAC364D04CE19878IV1302073047CE12664IV10627077242393653
BMBAC364D12CE05066III608144436CE01648III10372177114290733
BMBAC365G04CE27551I156761019CE09340I9956916158389306
BMBAC367E09CE29511III755190919CE28049III10232451112680542
BMBAC369F08CE20121IV1267427512CE06362IV11131027441543248
BMBAC370D08CE09762IV386745119CE17122IV7994133174126682
BMBAC372C01CE06239I852154815CE16055I10289506131767958
BMBAC372A05CE23035III1232343418CE27402III5842056156481378
BMBAC372F06CE29472III523176015CE00100III852162793289867
BMBAC372A09CE00872III415669210CE20934III3133584181023108
BMBAC373F04CE09880I889884612CE06511I7477616191421230
BMBAC374E02CE00946III466833810CE03076III393641320731925
BMBAC374F12CE21847IV175760921CE06364IV11128632119371023
BMBAC375A04CE25585IV675482712CE04562IV732628211571455
BMBAC375F12CE22210V1435329717CE21224V7077544167275753

Clones with significant matches at both ends. NA, not applicable.

C. elegans has six chromosomes. Under a minimal model, if a genome rearrangement were equally likely to involve a between-chromosome as a within-chromosome event, and was only dependent on the length of DNA in the within-chromosome versus not-within-chromosome classes, we would expect approximately five of every six rearrangements to involve between-chromosome events and one-sixth to involve within-chromosome events. This model ignores the fact that B. malayi has only five chromosome pairs: four autosomes and one XY pair. The derivation of the two karyotypes is unknown, and cannot be deduced from phylogenetic comparisons (see [35]). While most nematodes of clade V have six chromosomes like C. elegans, other taxa in the Secernentea have from one to > 100 [36]. If we assume that the C. elegans complement derives from splitting of an ancestral chromosome retained in B. malayi, the expectation would be that 20% of rearrangements would be within-chromosome. Many more BACs had significantly more ends mapping to the same chromosome than would be expected under these models (approximately 55%, χ2 test p < 0.01 for all comparisons in Table 2 under the above model). The mean distance between the C. elegans matches was 4.4 Mb, which may be compared to an expected approximately 45 kb for the separation between the B. malayi BAC ends.

Discussion

B. malayi is a human parasite only distantly related to the model nematode C. elegans [14,37]; therefore, genome comparisons between these species will yield data concerning longer-term changes in structure and function that cannot be derived from within-genus comparisons. In the 83 kb of genomic DNA flanking the B. malayi mif-1 locus we found a fractured conservation of microsynteny between the two nematode genomes, and conservation of linkage. Twelve protein-coding genes were predicted, and 11 of these had putative orthologs in the C. elegans genome. Ten of these orthologs were on C. elegans chromosome I, with eight in a 2.3 Mb segment in the center of the chromosome and two at the distal tip of chromosome I. Some of these genes have remained tightly linked in the same or slightly modified relative transcriptional orientations in both species. This pattern, of conservation of linkage with disruption of precise synteny, was confirmed using BAC-end sequences. Of the 171 clones with matches at both ends to C. elegans genes, over 55% were localized to the same chromosome in C. elegans. While the mean distance separating the B. malayi genes is 45 kb (the length of the BAC clones; [38] and C. Whitton and M.L.B., unpublished work), the mean distance between the matching C. elegans genes is approximately 4.4 Mb. The 83 kb fragment of B. malayi genomic DNA is the largest contiguated portion of sequenced genomic DNA from a non-rhabditid nematode described to date. A large proportion (around 60%) of genes identified in the B. malayi EST dataset (23,000 ESTs corresponding to around 8,300 unique transcripts [39]) have no close C. elegans homologue [16]. In this study, however, C. elegans orthologs were identified for 11 of the 12 identified B. malayi genes. Some of these orthologous pairs were confirmed by congruence in length of open reading frame and shared intron positions, despite low pairwise identity. Global searches with ESTs would not have detected these pairs (BLAST probability values of approximately e-4), and thus the true proportion of B. malayi unique genes is likely to be less than 60%. B. malayi genes were found to have larger and more numerous introns than C. elegans genes (2.2 times longer and 1.7 times more frequent), in keeping with previous estimates made using data from several highly expressed genes [40]. If the contig is representative and gene complement is equivalent to C. elegans, the B. malayi genome may be larger (120-140 Mb) than estimated previously (100 Mb [41]). Four of seven genes confirmed by reverse transcriptase PCR had alternative transcripts, a figure consistent with C. elegans EST and cDNA projects [42]. Additionally, five genes had B. malayi EST matches, a proportion congruent with the estimate that the EST program has identified around 40% of the expected 20,000 B. malayi genes [16]. Conserved linkage between the genomes of closely related eukaryotic organisms has been shown in several taxa. But it is only recently, with the sequencing of discrete segments or whole genomes, that examples of conservation of microsynteny between the genomes of distantly related species (not involving functionally related genes) have been described [43,44]. The microsyntenic gene clusters retained between C. elegans and B. malayi do not fall into any clear functional categories. However, all genes contained in the second cluster (BMBAC01P19.2, .4, and .5) are predicted to have nuclear localization signals and could be co-regulated. Alternatively, promoters or cis-acting regulatory elements required for their proper function could be embedded within other cluster members. Interdigitation of these regulatory elements could be constraining the movement of genes away from this cluster. No conserved motifs were found, however, and this possibility can thus only be tested by transgenesis experiments. This phenomenon has been observed in other systems such as fungal genomes, where gene pairs predicted to have overlapping regulatory elements are more likely to be conserved between species [45]. Many genes in C. elegans are co-transcribed in operons [46,47] and this could constrain synteny breakage. The C. elegans orthologs of BMBAC01L03.5 and BMBAC01P19.3 are separated by 501 bp, an intergenic distance found in other C. elegans operons, and the downstream gene (Ce-F43G9.4) was shown to be trans-spliced to the SL2 spliced leader, a feature of downstream genes in C. elegans operons [47]. However, in B. malayi, BMBAC01L03.5 and BMBAC01P19.3 are separated by 2.8 kb, which is outside the range of operon intergenic spacing. The functions of C. elegans genes on chromosome I have been investigated by RNA-mediated interference and a phenotype was identified for one gene in each cluster: embryonic lethality (F39G4.5 [48]) and altered adult morphology (C26C6.1 [49]). Therefore, it is possible that the clusters are conserved because removing other members would interfere with functions of these essential genes. The one exception to the conservation of linkage is the Bm-mif-1/Ce-mif-1 ortholog pair. Another C. elegans MIF homolog, Ce-mif-3, is found in close proximity to the genes in the pbr-1 synteny cluster, raising the possibility that a gene-conversion event may have obscured orthology assignment for this gene. In the Metazoa, long-range synteny between the genomes of distantly related species (>300 Myr divergence) has only been identified previously in vertebrates (teleost fish and humans [50,51]). In vertebrates, interchromosomal exchanges seem to be rare events, and some linkage groups, such as human chromosomes 6 and X, are conserved across most eutherian mammals [7]. From the analyses presented here we can suggest some general patterns of gene rearrangement in nematodes. Most of the C. elegans orthologs were located in a small segment of chromosome I (nine of eleven genes in 2.3 Mb or 16% of the chromosome), suggesting that local intrachromosomal inversions or rearrangements have occurred more frequently than long-range intrachromosomal, or interchromosomal rearrangements. This is consistent with patterns observed in closely related dipterans, where the composition of linkage groups is conserved but not the order within the chromosome. Mechanistically this may occur because intrachromosomal rearrangements require fewer DNA breaks than interchromosomal translocations, and the nuclear scaffold may hold local chromosomal regions in closer association. The high rate of rearrangement of genes within the nematode chromosomes makes it unlikely that the positional information of genes in the Caenorhabditis genomes will be useful in finding orthologous genes in the genomes of distantly related nematodes such as B. malayi.

Materials and methods

Identification of candidate genomic clones for sequencing

A probe for Bm-mif-1 was synthesized by labeling full-length cDNA (GenBank accession U88035) with biotin (Phototope; New England Biolabs), hybridized to high-density arrays of 18,000 BAC clones containing B. malayi genomic DNA [52], and detected with the Phototope detection kit (New England Biolabs). Hybridization-positive BACs were PCR verified using gene-specific primers Bm-MIF-1.F1a (ATGCCATATTTTACGATTGATAC) and Bm-MIF-1.R1a (GAACACCATCGCTTGTCCACC) using standard reaction and cycling conditions (0.2 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl, 0.5 pM primer; 1 cycle of 94°C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 15 sec, 55°C for 20 sec, 72°C for 3 min; 1 cycle of 72°C for 10 min). BMBAC01P19 was selected for sequencing. Sequence from the T7 end of the insert was used to design specific primers 01P19.T7.F1 (GCAGCAAATGCTTATTTGTCTTG) and 01P19.T7.R1 (GTTTGGTGATTCATGTCCATGAGC). Primers 01P19.T7.R1 and 2BiotinBACF3 (designed to the BAC vector; (biotinU)2GAGTCGACCTGCAGGCATGC; New England BioLabs Organic Synthesis Unit) were used to synthesize a biotin-labeled end probe. The probe was hybridized to the BAC library filter using a modified hybridization and detection protocol [38]. Positive BACs were PCR verified with primers 01P19.T7.R1 and 01P19.T7.F1, and insert DNA prepared using a kit (Qiagen). BAC ends were end-sequenced using the Sanger Institute protocol [53]. BMBAC01L03 showed minimal overlap with BMBAC01P19 compared to other clones and was selected for sequencing.

Preparation, subcloning, and sequencing of BACs

The BACs were sequenced using a standard two-stage strategy involving random sequencing of subcloned DNA followed by directed sequencing to resolve problem areas. In the first stage, DNA prepared from BAC clones was shattered by sonification and fragments of 1.4-2 kb cloned into pUC18. DNA from randomly selected clones was sequenced with dye-terminator chemistry and analyzed on automated sequencers. Each BAC was sequenced to a depth of sevenfold coverage. Contigs were assembled using phrap (Phil Green, Washington University Genome Sequencing Center, unpublished). Manual base calling and finishing was carried out using Gap4 [54]. Gaps and low-quality regions were resolved by techniques such as primer walking, PCR and resequencing clones under conditions that give increased read lengths.

Sequence analysis

The finished sequences of BMBAC01P19 and BMBAC01L03 were compared to the GenBank nonredundant (nucleic acid and protein) EST database (dbEST), the C. elegans genome and protein and the custom B. malayi clustered EST [16] databases using BLAST [55,56]. GeneFinder (P. Green and L. Hillier, Washington University Genome Sequencing Center, unpublished) was trained with 162 publicly available B. malayi gene sequences and used to analyze the contiguated sequence. The sequence was annotated on the Artemis workbench [57]. Predicted protein sequences were compared to Pfam [58] and cellular localization examined using PSORTII [59]. The annotated sequence is available in GenBank (accession AL606837).

Verification of gene predictions

To confirm gene predictions from BMBAC01P19, primers were designed and PCR was carried out on oligo(dT)-primed B. malayi mixed adult first-strand cDNA with gene-specific primers. To isolate cDNA ends, the GeneRacer 3' RACE primer (Invitrogen) (GCTGTCAACGATACGCTACGTAACGGCATGACAGTG), or the nematode SL1 sequence (GGTTTAATTACCCAAGTTTGAG) were used with specific primers. Secondary PCRs were carried out using nested primers and 2% of the primary PCR product. Positive PCR products were cloned and sequenced.

BAC-end sequence analysis

The B. malayi BAC-end sequence dataset was compared to the C. elegans proteome in Wormpep. Significant matches were filtered, and BAC clones having matches on both ends retained. The chromosomal position of the C. elegans genes was determined from [32].
  53 in total

1.  Chemiluminescent detection of sequential DNA hybridizations to high-density, filter-arrayed cDNA libraries: a subtraction method for novel gene discovery.

Authors:  D Guiliano; M Ganatra; J Ware; J Parrot; J Daub; L Moran; H Brennecke; J M Foster; T Supali; M Blaxter; A L Scott; S A Williams; B E Slatko
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.993

2.  Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element.

Authors:  M Cáceres; J M Ranz; A Barbadilla; M Long; A Ruiz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The PWWP domain: a potential protein-protein interaction domain in nuclear proteins influencing differentiation?

Authors:  I Stec; S B Nagl; G J van Ommen; J T den Dunnen
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2000-05-04       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Gene duplication and the structure of eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  R Friedman; A L Hughes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Dissection of the enzymatic and immunologic functions of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Full immunologic activity of N-terminally truncated mutants.

Authors:  R Kleemann; H Rorsman; E Rosengren; R Mischke; N T Mai; J Bernhagen
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2000-12

7.  The human SWI/SNF-B chromatin-remodeling complex is related to yeast rsc and localizes at kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  Y Xue; J C Canman; C S Lee; Z Nie; D Yang; G T Moreno; M K Young; E D Salmon; W Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Filarial nematode parasites secrete a homologue of the human cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor.

Authors:  D V Pastrana; N Raghavan; P FitzGerald; S W Eisinger; C Metz; R Bucala; R P Schleimer; C Bickel; A L Scott
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 9.  Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Identification of a novel serine/threonine kinase and a novel 15-kD protein as potential mediators of the gamma interferon-induced cell death.

Authors:  L P Deiss; E Feinstein; H Berissi; O Cohen; A Kimchi
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  17 in total

1.  Genome Architecture and Evolution of a Unichromosomal Asexual Nematode.

Authors:  Hélène Fradin; Karin Kiontke; Charles Zegar; Michelle Gutwein; Jessica Lucas; Mikhail Kovtun; David L Corcoran; L Ryan Baugh; David H A Fitch; Fabio Piano; Kristin C Gunsalus
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  The genomic basis of nematode parasitism.

Authors:  Mark Viney
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Very little intron loss/gain in Plasmodium: intron loss/gain mutation rates and intron number.

Authors:  Scott William Roy; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Limited microsynteny between the genomes of Pristionchus pacificus and Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Kwang-Zin Lee; Andreas Eizinger; Ramkumar Nandakumar; Stephan C Schuster; Ralf J Sommer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Origins of recently gained introns in Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Avril Coghlan; Kenneth H Wolfe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The putative cyclooctadepsipeptide receptor depsiphilin of the canine hookworm Ancylostoma caninum.

Authors:  Nina Krüger; Achim Harder; Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Genes encoding putative biogenic amine receptors in the parasitic nematode Brugia malayi.

Authors:  Katherine A Smith; Richard W Komuniecki; Elodie Ghedin; David Spiro; John Gray
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-20

8.  Draft genome of the filarial nematode parasite Brugia malayi.

Authors:  Elodie Ghedin; Shiliang Wang; David Spiro; Elisabet Caler; Qi Zhao; Jonathan Crabtree; Jonathan E Allen; Arthur L Delcher; David B Guiliano; Diego Miranda-Saavedra; Samuel V Angiuoli; Todd Creasy; Paolo Amedeo; Brian Haas; Najib M El-Sayed; Jennifer R Wortman; Tamara Feldblyum; Luke Tallon; Michael Schatz; Martin Shumway; Hean Koo; Steven L Salzberg; Seth Schobel; Mihaela Pertea; Mihai Pop; Owen White; Geoffrey J Barton; Clotilde K S Carlow; Michael J Crawford; Jennifer Daub; Matthew W Dimmic; Chris F Estes; Jeremy M Foster; Mehul Ganatra; William F Gregory; Nicholas M Johnson; Jinming Jin; Richard Komuniecki; Ian Korf; Sanjay Kumar; Sandra Laney; Ben-Wen Li; Wen Li; Tim H Lindblom; Sara Lustigman; Dong Ma; Claude V Maina; David M A Martin; James P McCarter; Larry McReynolds; Makedonka Mitreva; Thomas B Nutman; John Parkinson; José M Peregrín-Alvarez; Catherine Poole; Qinghu Ren; Lori Saunders; Ann E Sluder; Katherine Smith; Mario Stanke; Thomas R Unnasch; Jenna Ware; Aguan D Wei; Gary Weil; Deryck J Williams; Yinhua Zhang; Steven A Williams; Claire Fraser-Liggett; Barton Slatko; Mark L Blaxter; Alan L Scott
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Annotation of two large contiguous regions from the Haemonchus contortus genome using RNA-seq and comparative analysis with Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Roz Laing; Martin Hunt; Anna V Protasio; Gary Saunders; Karen Mungall; Steven Laing; Frank Jackson; Michael Quail; Robin Beech; Matthew Berriman; John S Gilleard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The draft genome of the parasitic nematode Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  Makedonka Mitreva; Douglas P Jasmer; Dante S Zarlenga; Zhengyuan Wang; Sahar Abubucker; John Martin; Christina M Taylor; Yong Yin; Lucinda Fulton; Pat Minx; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Wesley C Warren; Robert S Fulton; Veena Bhonagiri; Xu Zhang; Kym Hallsworth-Pepin; Sandra W Clifton; James P McCarter; Judith Appleton; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.