Literature DB >> 11483576

Molecular characterization of two natural hotspots in the Drosophila buzzatii genome induced by transposon insertions.

M Cáceres1, M Puig, A Ruiz.   

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) have been implicated in the generation of genetic rearrangements, but their potential to mediate changes in the organization and architecture of host genomes could be even greater than previously thought. Here, we describe the naturally occurring structural and nucleotide variation around two TE insertions in the genome of Drosophila buzzatii. The studied regions correspond to the breakpoints of a widespread chromosomal inversion generated by ectopic recombination between oppositely oriented copies of a TE named Galileo. A detailed molecular analysis by Southern hybridization, PCR amplification, and DNA sequencing of 7.1 kb surrounding the inversion breakpoints in 39 D. buzzatii lines revealed an unprecedented degree of restructuring, consisting of 22 insertions of ten previously undescribed TEs, 13 deletions, 1 duplication, and 1 small inversion. All of these alterations occurred exclusively in inverted chromosomes and appear to have accumulated after the insertion of the Galileo elements, within or close to them. The nucleotide variation at the studied regions is six times lower in inverted than in noninverted chromosomes, suggesting that most of the observed changes originated in only 84,000 years. Galileo elements thus seemed to promote the transformation of these, otherwise normal, chromosomal regions in genetically unstable hotspots and highly efficient traps for transposon insertions. The particular features of two new Galileo copies found indicate that this TE belongs to the Foldback family. Together, our results strengthen the importance of TEs, and especially DNA transposons, as inducers of genome plasticity in evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11483576      PMCID: PMC311088          DOI: 10.1101/gr.174001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  78 in total

1.  Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element.

Authors:  M Cáceres; J M Ranz; A Barbadilla; M Long; A Ruiz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  It takes two transposons to tango: transposable-element-mediated chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Y H Gray
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Molecular evolution and phylogeny of the buzzatii complex (Drosophila repleta group): a maximum-likelihood approach.

Authors:  F Rodríguez-Trelles; L Alarcón; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  Eukaryotic transposable elements and genome evolution.

Authors:  D J Finnegan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sequence and analysis of chromosome 4 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  K Mayer; C Schüller; R Wambutt; G Murphy; G Volckaert; T Pohl; A Düsterhöft; W Stiekema; K D Entian; N Terryn; B Harris; W Ansorge; P Brandt; L Grivell; M Rieger; M Weichselgartner; V de Simone; B Obermaier; R Mache; M Müller; M Kreis; M Delseny; P Puigdomenech; M Watson; T Schmidtheini; B Reichert; D Portatelle; M Perez-Alonso; M Boutry; I Bancroft; P Vos; J Hoheisel; W Zimmermann; H Wedler; P Ridley; S A Langham; B McCullagh; L Bilham; J Robben; J Van der Schueren; B Grymonprez; Y J Chuang; F Vandenbussche; M Braeken; I Weltjens; M Voet; I Bastiaens; R Aert; E Defoor; T Weitzenegger; G Bothe; U Ramsperger; H Hilbert; M Braun; E Holzer; A Brandt; S Peters; M van Staveren; W Dirske; P Mooijman; R Klein Lankhorst; M Rose; J Hauf; P Kötter; S Berneiser; S Hempel; M Feldpausch; S Lamberth; H Van den Daele; A De Keyser; C Buysshaert; J Gielen; R Villarroel; R De Clercq; M Van Montagu; J Rogers; A Cronin; M Quail; S Bray-Allen; L Clark; J Doggett; S Hall; M Kay; N Lennard; K McLay; R Mayes; A Pettett; M A Rajandream; M Lyne; V Benes; S Rechmann; D Borkova; H Blöcker; M Scharfe; M Grimm; T H Löhnert; S Dose; M de Haan; A Maarse; M Schäfer; S Müller-Auer; C Gabel; M Fuchs; B Fartmann; K Granderath; D Dauner; A Herzl; S Neumann; A Argiriou; D Vitale; R Liguori; E Piravandi; O Massenet; F Quigley; G Clabauld; A Mündlein; R Felber; S Schnabl; R Hiller; W Schmidt; A Lecharny; S Aubourg; F Chefdor; R Cooke; C Berger; A Montfort; E Casacuberta; T Gibbons; N Weber; M Vandenbol; M Bargues; J Terol; A Torres; A Perez-Perez; B Purnelle; E Bent; S Johnson; D Tacon; T Jesse; L Heijnen; S Schwarz; P Scholler; S Heber; P Francs; C Bielke; D Frishman; D Haase; K Lemcke; H W Mewes; S Stocker; P Zaccaria; M Bevan; R K Wilson; M de la Bastide; K Habermann; L Parnell; N Dedhia; L Gnoj; K Schutz; E Huang; L Spiegel; M Sehkon; J Murray; P Sheet; M Cordes; J Abu-Threideh; T Stoneking; J Kalicki; T Graves; G Harmon; J Edwards; P Latreille; L Courtney; J Cloud; A Abbott; K Scott; D Johnson; P Minx; D Bentley; B Fulton; N Miller; T Greco; K Kemp; J Kramer; L Fulton; E Mardis; M Dante; K Pepin; L Hillier; J Nelson; J Spieth; E Ryan; S Andrews; C Geisel; D Layman; H Du; J Ali; A Berghoff; K Jones; K Drone; M Cotton; C Joshu; B Antonoiu; M Zidanic; C Strong; H Sun; B Lamar; C Yordan; P Ma; J Zhong; R Preston; D Vil; M Shekher; A Matero; R Shah; I K Swaby; A O'Shaughnessy; M Rodriguez; J Hoffmann; S Till; S Granat; N Shohdy; A Hasegawa; A Hameed; M Lodhi; A Johnson; E Chen; M Marra; R Martienssen; W R McCombie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genetic studies of the lac repressor. VII. On the molecular nature of spontaneous hotspots in the lacI gene of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P J Farabaugh; U Schmeissner; M Hofer; J H Miller
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1978-12-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Analysis of two cosmid clones from chromosome 4 of Drosophila melanogaster reveals two new genes amid an unusual arrangement of repeated sequences.

Authors:  J Locke; L Podemski; K Roy; D Pilgrim; R Hodgetts
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Evidence for a common evolutionary origin of inverted repeat transposons in Drosophila and plants: hobo, Activator, and Tam3.

Authors:  B R Calvi; T J Hong; S D Findley; W M Gelbart
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-08-09       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  45 in total

1.  FB elements can promote exon shuffling: a promoter-less white allele can be reactivated by FB mediated transposition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R Moschetti; R M Marsano; P Barsanti; C Caggese; R Caizzi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Structural and functional divergence of a 1-Mb duplicated region in the soybean (Glycine max) genome and comparison to an orthologous region from Phaseolus vulgaris.

Authors:  Jer-Young Lin; Robert M Stupar; Christian Hans; David L Hyten; Scott A Jackson
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  LINE-1 amplification accompanies explosive genome repatterning in rodents.

Authors:  Gauthier Dobigny; Catherine Ozouf-Costaz; Paul D Waters; Céline Bonillo; Jean-Pierre Coutanceau; Vitaly Volobouev
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Direct determination of the effects of genotype and extreme temperature on the transposition of roo in long-term mutation accumulation lines of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Fernando Vázquez; Jesús Albornoz; Ana Domínguez
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Genomic instability within centromeres of interspecific marsupial hybrids.

Authors:  Cushla J Metcalfe; Kira V Bulazel; Gianni C Ferreri; Elizabeth Schroeder-Reiter; Gerhard Wanner; Willem Rens; Craig Obergfell; Mark D B Eldridge; Rachel J O'Neill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Cédric Feschotte; Ellen J Pritham
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 7.  The struggle for life of the genome's selfish architects.

Authors:  Aurélie Hua-Van; Arnaud Le Rouzic; Thibaud S Boutin; Jonathan Filée; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  LINE-1 distribution in Afrotheria and Xenarthra: implications for understanding the evolution of LINE-1 in eutherian genomes.

Authors:  Paul D Waters; Gauthier Dobigny; Amanda T Pardini; Terence J Robinson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  The Foldback-like element Galileo belongs to the P superfamily of DNA transposons and is widespread within the Drosophila genus.

Authors:  Mar Marzo; Marta Puig; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  High level of structural polymorphism driven by mobile elements in the Hox genomic region of the Chaetognath Spadella cephaloptera.

Authors:  Ferdinand Marlétaz; Gabor Gyapay; Yannick Le Parco
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.